Research Article

 

Validation of One-step Multiplex RT-PCR for Diagnosis of Respiratory Viruses Coinfections in Chickens

 

Marwa Hamed I. Salem1*, Naglaa M. Hagag2, Ahmed A.H. Ali3, Mohammed Saed M. El-Shahidy4

1Department of Virology, Zagazig Branch, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. 2RLQP, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, 12618, Giza, P.O. Box 246, Egypt. 3Department of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. 4Department of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

 

Received | June 10, 2020; Accepted | June 25, 2020; Published | July 10, 2020

*Correspondence | Marwa Hamed I. Salem, Department of Virology, Animal Health Research Institute, Zagazig, 44516, Egypt; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Salem MHI, Hagag NM, Ali AAH, El-Shahidy MSM (2020). Validation of one-step multiplex RT-PCR for diagnosis of respiratory viruses coinfections in chickens. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 8(s1): 62-67.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.s1.62.67

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2020 Salem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Caused by viruses, respiratory diseases are the most devastating in the poultry industry due to their major economic losses. In most cases, there is more than one virus involved simultaneously in respiratory viral diseases (Malik et al., 2004). Among many avian respiratory viruses, AIV, IBV, and NDV are the most important co-infected viruses of poultry in Egypt (Ali and Reynolds, 2000). AI, caused by influenza A viruses of the Orthomyxoviridae family, infects a wide range of birds and cause respiratory or systemic diseases that vary in severity and cause heavy losses to the poultry industry worldwide (Aly et al., 2008) including Egyptian provinces (Dabbour, 2015). AIV is subtyped according to their surface glycoproteins named hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N). Currently, there are 18 H glycoproteins (H1 to H18) and 11 N glycoproteins (N1 to N11) (CDC, 2018). The IB, caused by IB virus (IBV), results in high mortality, affects weight gain and feed efficiency, and increased condemnations (Cavanagh and Gelb, 2008). The virus (IBV) undergoes mutations in chickens resulting in the emergence of new variant serotypes and genotypes that can escape vaccine immunization (Dolz et al., 2008). With the emergence of novel strains of IBV, besides an understanding of disease epidemiology and virus evolution, it is essential to rapidly detect and implement control measures (De-Wit, 2000). Similarly, caused by avian Paramyxovirus 1, ND is an important contagious disease worldwide (Cao et al., 2013), including Egypt. It is classified as a List A disease by OIE (OIE, 2012).

 

Replaced by the classical methods, molecular techniques are recently well-established in the virology laboratories for the diagnosis of viral infections. Widespread usage of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a rapid diagnostic technique has enhanced the capability of a laboratory for the diagnosis of any clinical disease. As a modification to the conventional PCR test, the use of multiplex primers has further enhanced the viral detection sensitivity (Alexander, 2000). Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) is the simultaneous detection of more than one virus in a tube reaction. The first report of multiplex PCR included the diagnosis of inherited genetic diseases (Dieffenbach et al., 1993). Further, it was proved to be a significant method for pathogen identification (Kalvatchev et al., 2004), where, along with a reduction in effort and time, it was found to be more sensitive and specific (Edwards and Gibbs, 1994).

 

A simultaneous coinfection of chickens with more than one virus has been evidenced in many chicken farms in Egypt. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop and validate multiplex reverse transcriptase-PCR (mRT-PCR) for detection and differential diagnosis of AIV, IBV and NDV.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Local virus strains

Local reference viruses (AIV with accession no. MH893738, KP209303 and MH762070 and NDV with accession no. KU365663 and IBV with accession no. KT832809) that were used as a positive control in the standardization and validation of multiplex RT- PCR are listed in Table 1. These viruses were isolated from Egyptian poultry farms and were characterized by RLQP (Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production) -animal health research institute, Dokki, Egypt. Virus strains were propagated in 11-d-old SPF embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) up to three passages for IBV and tested according to the method described previously (Beard, 1980; Swayne et al., 1998).

 

Clinical samples

A total of 138 nasal swabs and 144 tissue samples (brain, trachea, lung, liver, proventriculus, spleen, kidney, intestine, and cecal tonsils) were collected from broiler farms, originating from five Egyptian governorates (1- Ismailia, 2- Sharkia, 3- Gharbia, 4-Dakahleia, and 5- Matrooh (Figure 1)). Individual tissue samples for each bird were pooled in a tube and processed accordingly. All sampled chickens were suffering from severe respiratory illness, with mortalities ranging from 5 to 20%. Nasal swabs and tissue pools were prepared and processed according to the methods described previously (OIE, 2014).

 

 

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from swabs, tissue pools, and reference virus isolates using Dynabeads® SILANE viral NA Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

 

Primers and probes

Three sets of primers and probes were used for the detection of AIV, NDV, and IBV in the qRT-PCR and the mRT-PCR. Primers and Probes were specifically amplified targeting M, NP, F genes of AIV, IBV, and NDV respectively in qRT-PCR where primers amplified M, S1, F genes of AIV, IBV and NDV respectively in mRT-PCR. The sequence and length of amplified fragments of the primers and probes are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The sequences were obtained from published data in the literature and synthesized by Operon Biotechnologies (Huntsville, AL) (Naglaa et al., 2014; Gelb et al., 2005; Adzhar et al., 1997, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute).

 

Table 1: Local reference virus strains and their accession number.

 

Accession No	Reference strain	Virus
MH893738	Influenza A virus (A/duck/Egypt/SS19/2017)	AI/H5N8
KP209303	(A/goose/Egypt/1439FAOS/2014(H5N1)	AI/H5N1
MH762070	Influenza A virus (A/chicken/Egypt/18558V/2018)	AI/H9N2
KU365663	NDV-31-EGYPT-NLQP-2014	NDV
KT832809	IBV-NLQP-15919F	IBV

 

Table 2: Primer and Probe sequences used for qRT-PCR.

 

IBV-F	5-GCTTTTGAGCCTAGCGTT-3
IBV-R	5-GCCATGTTGTCACTGTCTATTG-3
IBV-PROBE	5-FAM-CACCACCAGAACCTGTCACCTC-BHQ1-3
NDV-F	5-TCCGGAGGATACAAGGGTCT-3
NDV-R	5-AGCTGTTGCAACCCCAAG-3
NDV-PROBE (VFP-1)	5-FAM-AGCGTTTCTGTCTCCTTCCTCCA-TAMRA-3
sepro-01	5-AGA TGA GTC TTC TAA CCG AGG TCG-3
Sepro-02	5-TGC AAA AACATC TTC AAG TCT CTG-3
Sepro-probe	5-FAM-TCAGGCCCCCTCAAAGCCGA-BHQ1-3

 

Table 3: Oligonucleotide primers used in RT-PCR and length of the amplified products.

 

Virus	Primer name	Primer Sequence	Product size	Reference
NDV	F330 R700	5-AGG AAG GAG ACA AAA ACG TTT TAT AGG-3 5-TCA GCT GAG TTA ATG CAG GGG AGG-3	400pb	(Naglaa et al., 2014)
IBV	HVR1-2-F HVR1-2-R	5-GTKTACTACTACCARAGTGC -3 5- GAAGTGRAAACRAGATCACCATTTA -3	700pb	(Gelb et al., 2005; Adzhar et al., 1997)
AIV	M-7FV2 M124R	5-AAAGCAGGAAGATGTTGAAAGA-3 5-TGCAAAAACATCTTCAAGTCTCTG-3	124pb	(Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute)

 

Codes for mixed bases positions: R, A/G; K, G/T.

 

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

A one-step qRT-PCR was employed using INVITROGEN kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). following the protocol of the manufacturers. The cycling conditions were once each of 30 min at 48oC, and 10 min at 95oC once, followed by 40 cycles of each of 95oC for 15seconds, 60oC for 1 minute, where the fluorescence was recorded at 60oC.

 

Multiplex RT-PCR

Amplification of three RNA viruses (AIV, IBV, and NDV) were simultaneously performed to amplify M, S1, F genes of AIV, IBV, and NDV, respectively using SuperScriptTM III One-Step RT-PCR kit with Platinum®Tag (INVITROGEN). Multiplex RT-PCR was optimized and validated using local reference strains and the clinical samples. Several chemical and thermal conditions were evaluated, and the assay was optimized by adjusting primers concentrations, the thermal cycling temperatures, and the duration according to the method described previously (Markoulatos et al., 1999). The RT reaction was done at 48ºC for 30 minutes, along with an initial denaturation at 95 ºC for 3 minutes. This was followed by 35 cycles of each of 94 ºC for 20 seconds, 50ºC for 30 seconds, and 72 ºC for 20 seconds. The final extension was performed at 72 ºC for 5 minutes.

 

Results

 

qRT-PCR

Positive control viruses were used to determine the Ct value at which amplification of M, NP, and F gene begins, for AIV (A/chicken/Egypt/ 18558V /2018), for IBV (IBV-NLQP-15919F) and NDV (NDV-31Egypt-NLQP-2014). The amplification of the NP gene of reference IBV begins at 16.4 Ct value, while for the F gene of reference NDV and M gene of reference AIV, it begins at Ct 12 and 24, respectively. Nasal swabs and tissue pools of chickens infected with AIV, IBV, and NDV were examined by qRT-PCR using specific primers and probes for AIV, IBV, and NDV. All primer-probe pairs reacted only with their corresponding targets with mean Ct values ranging from 24.5-32.1 for AIV, 23.8-27 for NDV, and 26.3-31.2 for IBV.

 

Validation of monoplex (uniplex) and mRT-PCR

Optimization of RT-mix, Primer annealing temperature, and template concentrations:

RT-mix were optimized to 2.5µl, 5µl, 10µl, and 15µl in a total volume of 20µl. A maximum yield of specific PCR bands for the tested viruses was observed at an annealing temperature of 50oC and 56°C (Figure 2A). The optimum concentrations of the target RNA for Avian Influenza (15 μg/µl), Newcastle disease virus (20μg/μl), and Infectious Bronchitis virus (15 μg/μl) were determined.

 

 

The specificity of uniplex and duplex RT-PCR

The developed uniplex and mRT-PCR for reference strains of AIV, IBV, and NDV were affirmed to be particular by amplifying RNA fragments of three reference viruses. The assay produced amplicons tha were expected for each of the three viruses as 124bp for AIV, 700bp for IBV, and 400bp for NDV. No amplicon was detected by negative control or no template control (NTC).

 

The sensitivity of uniplex and mRT-PCR

The sensitivity of both uniplex and mRT-PCR was assessed using a 10-fold serial dilution of the cDNA of reference positive control extract. RNA of positive control for each virus was diluted (10-1 to 10-8), and each of the dilutions processed for uniplex and multiplex PCR. The lower limit of detection (LOD) was found to be 10-3 for NDV, 10-4 for IBV, and 10-5 for AIV. This LOD was found to be corresponding to 15, 14, and 19 picograms for the RNA extracted from the reference strains.

 

Optimization of multiplex RT-PCR in a clinical sample

An ability of multiplex RT-PCR to detect more than one virus template in a reaction was assessed in clinical samples (Figure 3). Tissue pools and swab samples proved to be positive for at least one of NDV or AIV or IBV by qRT- PCR. Results of the occurrence of co-infections in broiler farms among the five Egyptian provinces are presented in Table 4, showed that, single virus infection is prominent than double and triple virus infection as 60 samples out of 80 positives suffered of single virus infection with a total 75%, while the occurrence of the dual co-infection was more frequent than the triple one, where 15% of the sample had a dual occurrence of co-infection where, AIV with IBV mixed infection represents the most prominent than infection with IB and NDV with a total percentage of 7.5% and 5% respectively. The lowest double infection percentage observed when AIV mixed with NDV with a total percentage of 2.5% , while 10 % of the samples had a simultaneous occurrence of the three viruses in this study. (Figure 2B).

 

 

Table 4: Single, double and triple viral infections in 5 Egyptian province broiler farms.

 

Govern. / total +ve	Single infection		Double infection		Triple infection		Total
	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Sharkia-Swabs (11)	6	54.54	3	27.27	2	18.18	11
Tissue pools(11)	8	72.72	2	18.18	1	0.1	11
Dakahlia- swabs (8)	7	87.5	1	12.5	-	00.00	8
Tissue pools (8)	7	87.5	1	12.5	-	00.00	8
Gharbia- Swab (8)	6	75	1	12.5	1	12.5	8
Tissue pool (8)	5	62.5	2	25	1	12.5	8
Matrouh-Swab (4)	4	100	-	00.00	-	00.00	4
Tissue pool (4)	4	100	-	00.00	-	00.00	4
Ismailia- Swab (9)	6	66.66	1	11.11	2	22.22	9
Tissue pool (9)	7	77.77	1	11.11	1	11.11	9
Total (80)	60	75	12	15	8	10	80

 

Discussion

 

Respiratory infections are of great concern around the world, which are frequently related to the simultaneous occurrence of infections (Yashpal et al., 2004). Coinfections of poultry complicate and hinder the identification and diagnosis (Costa-Hurtado et al., 2014). A co-infection in poultry with other respiratory viruses has a significant impact on disease pathogenicity, e.g., an occurrence of AIV along with NDV and IBV has a significant effect on the disease pathogenicity (Pan et al., 2012; Pu et al., 2012). Using molecular methods, for instance, conventional PCR, an individual detection of viruses from a co-infection is laborious, intensive, and expensive. This disadvantage is overcome by developing an mRT-PCR that uses more than one primer set for amplification of many genes in a single reaction (Elnifro et al., 2000). Indeed, mRT-PCR method amplifies many genes of several viruses simultaneously and, therefore, this method reduces the need for reagents and the personnel time (Renshaw et al., 2001).

 

For RT-PCR amplification, the target sequences selected were Matrix (M) gene for AI virus, Fusion Protein (F) gene for ND virus and Surface protein 1 (S1) for IB virus. First, the amplification is conducted as monoplex RT-PCR in individual reaction for different reaction and different amplification condition, then to do more effective, efficient and easier rapid diagnostic techniques, this study has been developed a modification for the simultaneous detection of AI, ND and IB viruses in a single step multiplex RT-PCR reaction. In either monoplex or multiplex RT-PCR for amplification of viral genes, each primer set produced virus specific products of expected size of 124 bp for M gene of AI virus, 400 bp for F gene of ND virus and 700 bp for S1 gene of IB virus respectively.

 

The results of multiplex PCR for these three respiratory viruses suggest that multiplex PCR is able to detect and differentiate the presence of these respiratory viruses in the clinical samples (Table 4). A multiplex PCR that simultaneously detects and differentiates the three major respiratory viruses of chicken will be highly advantageous to the poultry industry, particularly in Egypt. Rapid but specific detection without the need for subculture in host systems would greatly aid the diagnosis and control of outbreaks. A multiplex PCR system will be more economical and will require less time than a single PCR for each of these three avian respiratory pathogens.

 

Conclusions

 

A multiplex RT-PCR assay can be used for the simultaneous detection of more than one virus in one sample in a short time. The assay has found to be specific, sensitive and requires fewer reagents and time than conventional PCR. Also, the assay can be used to diagnose difficult-to-culture viruses from clinical samples such as IBV. Further studies are necessary to ascertain study outcomes and its potential application on other poultry viruses of immense importance.

 

Acknowledgements

 

This work was supported by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

 

Authors Contribution

 

All authors contributed equally to this work.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

• Adzhar AK, Gough R, Haydon D, Shaw K, Britton P, Cavanagh D (1997). Molecular analysis of the 793/B scrotype of infectious bronchitis virus in Great Britain.Avian Pathol., 26: 625. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459708419239

• Alexander DJ (2003). Newcastle disease and other avianparamyxoviruses, and pneumovirus infections. Dis. Poult. pp. 63-52.

• Ali A, Reynolds DL (2000). A multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for Newcastle disease virus and avian pneumovirus (Colorado strain). Avian Dis., 44: 938– 943. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593068

• Aly MM, Arafa A, Hassan MK (2008). Epidemiological findings of outbreaks of disease caused by highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in poultry in Egypt during 2006. Avian Dis. 52: 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1637/8166-103007-Reg.1

• Beard CW (1980). Serologic procedures. In: Hitchner SB, Domermuth CH, Purchase HG, Williams JE (eds.), Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens. Am. Assoc. Avian Pathol. Kennett Square, PA, USA. pp. 129-135.

• Cao Y, Gu M, Zhang X, Liu W, Liu X (2013). Complete genome sequences of two newcastle disease virus strains of genotype VIII. Genome Announc. 1: 01. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00180-12

• Cavanagh D, Gelb J (2008). Infectious bronchitis. In: Saif YM, Fadly AM, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan MK, Swayne DE (eds). Dis. Poult., 12th edn. Ames/Iowa, BlackWell, pp. 117–136.

• CDC (2018). Centers for disease control and prevention, national center for immunization and respiratory diseases (NCIRD) 2018.

• Costa-Hurtado M, Afonso CL, Miller PJ, Spackman E, Kapczynski DR, Swayne DE, Shepherd E, Smith D, Zsak A, Pantin-Jackwood M (2014). Virus interference between H7N2 low pathogenic avian influenza virus and lentogenic Newcastle disease virus in experimental co-infections in chickens and turkeys. Vet. Res. 45: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-45-1

• Dabbour ASS (2015). Studies on avian influenza subtype H9 in west delta governments in Egypt. M.V.Sc (Poultry Diseases). Fac. Vet. Med. Alex. Univ.

• De-Wit J (2000). Technical review. Detection of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol., 29: 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450094108

• Dieffenbach CW, Lowe TMJ, Dveksler GS (1993). General concepts for PCR primer design. PCR Methods Appl. 3: S30–S37. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3.3.S30

• Dolz R, Pujols J, Ordóñez G, Porta R, Majó N (2008). Molecular epidemiology and evolution of avian infectious bronchitis virus in Spain over a fourteen-year period. Virology. 374: 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2007.12.020

• Edwards MC, Gibbs RA (1994). Multiplex PCR: advantages, development, and applications. PCR Methods Appl., 3: S65–S75. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3.4.S65

• Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE (2000). Multiplex PCR: Optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.13.4.559

• Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute. The Friedrich Loeffler Institute (FLI): The National Institute for Animal Health of Germany.

• Gelb JJ, Weisman Y, Ladman B, Meir R (2005). Gene characteristics and efficacy of vaccination against infectious bronchitis virus field isolates from the United States and Israel (1996-2000). Avian Pathol., 34: 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500096539

• Kalvatchev Z, Draganov P, Kalvatchev N (2004). Efficiency of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) for detection and molecular analysis of human viruses. Biotechnol. Eq., 18(3): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2004.10817113

• Malik YS, Patnayak DP, Goyal SM (2004). Detection of three avian respiratory viruses by single-tube multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 16: 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600314

• Markoulatos P, Samara V, Siafakas N, Plakokefalos E, Spyrou N, Moncany M (1999). Development of a quadriplex polymerase chain reaction for human cytomegalovirus. J. Clin. Lab. Anal., 13: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1999)13:3<99::AID-JCLA2>3.0.CO;2-E

• Naglaa M, Hagag, Zanaty AM, Soliman MA, Saied M, Arafa, Hassan MK (2014). Phylogenetic and Histopathological characterization of Newcastle disease viruses reveals high prevalence of very virulent strains of genotype VIId in Egypt. Assist. Vet. Med. J., 61. 168-178.

• OIE, Office International des Epizootie (2012). Newcastle disease. OIE terrestrial manual. Office International des Epizootie, New Brunswick.

• OIE (2014). Newcastle disease (chapter 2.1.15) from OIE manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals.

• Pan Q, Liu A, Zhang F, Ling Y, Ou C, Hou N, He C (2012). Co-infection of broilers with Ornithobacteriumrhinotracheale and H9N2 avian influenza virus. BMC Vet. Res. pp. 8-104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-104

• Pu J, Fan YL, Wang Z, Ma B, Brown EG, Liu JH (2012). Pathogenicity of H3N8 influenza viruses isolated from domestic ducks in chickens with or without Escherichia coli coinfections. Avian Dis., 56: 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1637/9984-110911-ResNote.1

• Renshaw MA, Ellingsen D, Costner B, Benson J, Heit JA, Hooper WC (2001). Fluorescent multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of four genes associated with in paired fibrinolysis and myocardial infarction. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 12(4): 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-200106000-00004

• Swayne, DE, Swnne, DA and Beard, CW (1998). Isolation and identification of avian pathogens. 4th Ed. American Association of Avian Pathology, Pennsylvania, USA.

• Yashpal SM, Devi PP, Sagar MG (2004). Detection of three avian respiratory viruses by single-tube multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 16:244-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600314