Research Article

 

Progesterone Level of Lactating Ewes Influenced by Parity Order, Type of Lambing and Lambs Sex

 

Amel Mustafa Kamil*

Middle Technical University, College of Health and Medical Technics, Baghdad, Iraq.

 

Editor | Kuldeep Dhama, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Received | October 20, 2018; Accepted | December 24, 2018; Published | January 30, 2019

*Correspondence | Amel Mustafa Kamil, Middle Technical University, College of Health and Medical Technics, Baghdad, Iraq; Email: [email protected]

Citation | Kamil AM (2019). Progesterone level of lactating ewes influenced by parity order, type of lambing and lambs sex. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 7(4): 295-300.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2019/7.4.295.300

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2019 Kamil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Progesterone is a steroid hormone produce from corpus luteum (CL) from granulosa-lutein cells through reproduction phase and from the placenta through pregnancy. Adrenal cortex also source of few amounts of progesterone. (Miller & Auchus 2011; McGraw, 2007). It has several important functions, it induces ovulation, facilitates implantation of embryo in the uterus in early pregnancy (Clark & Sutherl, 1990; Graham & Clarke, 1997), and prevents contraction of myometrium during pregnancy due to decrease calcium intake by uterus muscle during pregnancy (Clark & Sutherl, 1990, Niswender et al., 2000). It has a part in the mammary gland growth and development with estrogen during puberty and pregnancy. Estrogen hormone required for ductal and branch system growth while progesterone responsible for the development of a lobular alveolar system of the mammary gland in production of milk (Sivaraman et al., 2001). Progesterone level in blood reflects reproductive state of animal (Qureshi et al., 2000; Ball & Peters, 2004). Postpartum period in farm animals characterizes by uterine involution and restoration of ovarian activity which have to take place to new pregnancy (Takayama et al., 2010; Medan & El-Daek, 2015) which affects by many factors like season of birth, nutrition, lactation, number of fetus, intensity of suckling and breed (Senger, 2003; Khanum et al., 2008; Hileman et al., 2011; Ivan et al., 2016). Thus the current study aimed to determine a level of progesterone hormone at lambing and postpartum periods, and study the impact of parity number, type of lambing and sex of lambs on progesterone level among Awassi Turkish ewes in Iraq.

 

Material and Methods

 

Animals

24 pregnant Awassi Turkish ewes selected from flock of 50 ewes which were used in the current study achieved in sheep and goat rearing station in Baghdad/ ministry of agriculture, at age of 2- 4 years old in two parties first and fourth parity at last month of gestation which determined by ultrasonography method All these ewes were separated from rams from the first month of gestation and housed in the semi-open yard under veterinarian observation. All ewes subjected to the feeding regime of the station. Their fodder was Concentration 14% protein and roughage. Minerals and water were access all the day. All ewes were grazed three hours daily for exercises and sunlight exposure to complete nutritional requirements. All newborn lambs left with their dams continuously to get enough amounts from colostrum and for normal lactation until the age of weaning at 70 days.

 

Blood Collection

The jugular vein was the site of blood collection by anticoagulant free vacationer tubes in the morning before feeding every 14 days. The first sample was drawn before lambing at 135 ± 2 days of gestation. The second sample was at the day of lambing, while the following collections were each 14 days (six sample for each ewe with a total 144 samples) which cold transported to the laboratory for centrifugation 3000 c/min for 20 minutes to get serum which preserved at -18c until the day of hormone testing by radioimmune assay.

 

Statistical Analysis

For presentation data and analysis using SPSS Vr. 24:

-Descriptive statistics (mean and stander deviation).

-Compare means by using t- test

-Sample correlation coffetion (r).

- 5- 1% the level of analysis used in analysis of data.

 

Results

 

Table 1 shows descriptive statistics of progesterone level in the first parity which appears the largest mean (3.479) in the prepartum period while the lowest level (1.0033) at 28 days postpartum.

 

Table 1: Descriptive Statisticsof Progesterone /1st parity

 

Collection days	Min.	Max.	Mean	Std.
prepartum progesterone (T1)	1.3	4.3	3.479	1.3328
lambingday (T2)	0.2	2.1	1.367	.8454
14 day (T3)	0.2	2.0	1.383	.6494
28 day (T4)	0.20	1.80	1.0033	.54043
42 day (T5)	0.24	1.60	1.0233	.56997
56 day (T6)	0.40	1.90	1.4333	.53914

 

Table 2 shows descriptive statistics of progesterone in the 4th parity which appears the largest mean of progesterone at the prepartum period (2.503) while the lowest mean at 4 weeks postpartum (1.733) in the fourth parity.

 

Table 2: Descriptive Statisticsof Progesterone /4th parity

 

Collection days	Min.	Max.	Mean	Std.
Prepartum Progesterone (T1)	1.6	2.8	2.503	.3137
lambing day (T2)	0.8	2.1	1.533	.4719
14 day (T3)	0.6	1.9	1.567	.4885
28 day (T4)	1.3	1.9	1.733	.2338
42 day (T5)	0.8	1.8	1.417	.3869
56 day (T6)	0.8	1.7	1.483	.3545

 

Table 3 shows significant differences P≤0.05 in the level of certain hormone between comparative parities at prepartum day and at 28 day postpartum, While the significant absence in the rest time.

 

Table 3: t- Test of Progesterone /1st parity & Progesterone /4th parity

 

	t	P-Value	C.S
Prog1T1 & Prog4T1	2.580	0.0171	P≤0.05 (S)
Prog1T2 & Prog4T2	0.449	0.672	P>0.05 (NS)
Prog1T3 & Prog4T3	0.591	0.580	P>0.05 (NS)
Prog1T4& Prog4T4	2.573	0.050	P≤0.05 (S)
Prog1T5 & Prog4T5	1.109	0.318	P>0.05 (NS)
Prog1T6 & Prog4T6	0.173	0.870	P>0.05(NS)

 

Table 4 shows the impact of sex of a newborn on the level of progesterone which appears no impact of newborn sex on the level of progesterone in the 1st parity.

 

Table 4: t- Test of Progesterone /1stparity & Sex

 

Progesterone /1st parity	Mean± Std.	t	P-Value	C.S
Male	0.801±0.415	0.306	0.769	P>0.05 (NS)
Female	0.871±0.190

 

Table 5 shows the impact of sex of a newborn on the level of progesterone which appears no impact of newborn sex on the level of progesterone in the 4th parity

 

Table 5: t- Test of Progesterone /4thparity & Sex

 

Progesterone /4st parity	Mean± Std.	t	P-Value	C.S
Male	1.221±0.13132	1.731	0.141	P>0.05 (NS)
Female	1.423±0.141

 

Table 6 shows an effect of lambing type on the level of p4 which appearssignificant increase P≤0.05 in the level of p4 among twins bearing ewes than those which single bear ewes in the first parity.

 

Table 6: t- Test of Progesterone /1st parity& Type of lambing

 

Progesterone /1st parity	Mean± Std.	t	P-Value	C.S
Single	1.751±0.280	2.856	0.046	P≤0.05 (S)
Twins	0.997±0.362

 

Table 7 shows an effect of lambing type on the level of p4 which appears no effect of lambing type on the level of p4 among 4th parity.

 

Table 7: t- Test of Progesterone /4th parity& Type of lambing

 

Progesterone /4th parity	Mean± Std.	t	P-Value	C.S
Single	1.630±0.215	0.695	0.525	P>0.05 (NS)
Twins	1.467±0.000

 

Discussion

 

Progesterone is a particular signal to corpus luteum function in this period whereas it is the master steroid secretes from CL (Berardinelli et al., 2001) The existing study has shown variation in the levels of progesterone in the postpartum period disagree with other studies which relied on the claim of the level of postpartum progesterone >1ng/m indicates to CL activity (Thimonier 2000; Berardinelli et al., 2001; Hayder & Ali, 2008). This differences in the level of postpartum p4 maybe result from genotype variation among breeds due to feeding intake, milk production and physiological condition among breeds produce diversity in the postpartum anestrus period to fertile one, in addition to the influence of seasons (Pope et al., 1989; Medan & El-Daek, 2015). Over and above reasons the long period between blood collection days in the present study prevents follow the changes in p4 level precisely (Kaskous et al., 2001).

 

The level of prepartum p4 (2 wks. before lambing) highly significant in 1st parity than 4th one because of the number of twins in the 1st parity more than 4th parity which agrees with Khan & Ludri, (2002) and Souhayla, (2015) who found p4 level higher in twins bearing goats than the single bearing one. The low concentration of progesterone in the blood at the end of gestation will stimulate α-lactalbumin synthesis and complete lactose synthesis to initiate lactation (Cowie & Tindal, 1971).

 

The pattern changes of P4 levels from prepartum to lambing result from conversion of p4 to estradiol and produces PGF2 alpha from the placenta, which regress the corpus luteum under effect of fetal corticoid (Jainudeen & Hafez 2000; Senger 2003; Gibb et al., 2006) agree with Shanaz et al. (2001), Kaskous et al. (2001) & Khan & Ludri, (2002).

 

The little resemble in P4 level at lambing and 14 day pp in both parties results from poor activity of corpus lutum due to lactation and suckling which obstacle LH secretion, (Mwaaga & Janowski, 2000) through elevation of oxytocin followed by prolactin after stimulation of teat (Crowe, 2008; Crowe et al., 2014) which inhibits secretion of GnRH causing inadequate LH release that is substantial for growth and maturation of ovarian follicles and delayed ovulation (Yavas & Walton, 2000). In addition to a maternal relationship through visual and/ or olfactory singles between dams and their lambs delays ovarian resumption. Moreover, suckling frequency plays an important role to get the same result. (Noakes et al., 2001; Crowe, 2008; Crowe et al., 2014) the effect of suckling on the P4 level in the present study agrees with Terán et al. (2011) and Oliveira et al. (2013) who found ewes under controlling suckling return to ovulation significantly before uncontrolling group of ewes . As well as agrees with Costa et al. (2007) & Morales et al. (2004) and agree with Khan & Ludri, (2002) in goats. The low levels of p4 through lactation period in both parties agree with Özpınar et al. (2003) & Mohammed et al. (2007).

 

The significant decline (p< 0.05) in P4 at 28 days (4th weeks pp) in the 1st parity represents the highest level of lactation in the ewes in this period (Rubianes, 1993; Al-Ekpi et al ., 2010) leading to increase demands of lambs makes the mechanism more complex associated also with nutritional status of dam which starts negative and indirect influence in LH secretion (McNeilly, 2006) that confirm the impact of lactation, whereas the number of twins births in 1st parity more than 4th one which associated with high milk yield (Loerch et al., 1985; Adegoke et al., 2015; Gamit et al., 2018) In addition to impacts of intensity and frequency of suckling comparing with 4th parity (Terán et al., 2011; Oliveira et al., 2015) which agree with Rubianes, (1993) and Kascose et al. (2001).

 

However the significant increase (P≤0.05) in the P4 at 28 days (4th week) pp reflects resumption of ovarian activity which agrees with the line of Rubianes, (1993) who find out The first ovulation occurs in Corriedale ewes between day 17 to 25 in autumn lambing. Reffat et al. (2012) reports that p4 > 1ng/ml at 22.0 ± 2.5 d in Farfara ewes had a complete uterine involution and luteal activity within 35 days postpartum during October lambing season. The present finding disagree with Sadat, (2014) who reported the first rise of p4 was 69 days pp, ditto disagree with Kascose et al 2001 who found the first ovulation before day 20 pp as a result of seasonal effectiveness, early weaning and presence of ram in Awassi ewes., while Farfara ewes lambed in February showed p4 >1 ng/ml at 39.0 ± 1.2 d and 69.3 ± 1.2 d in June (Hayder & Ali, 2008). The current results disagree with Medan & El-Daek T, (2015), Lamraoui et al. (2017) who found first elevation in p4 > 1ng/ml was at 119, 99 and 77 day in different lambing months in Barbary ewes and at six week pp. in Ouled Djellal Ewes respectively. The modulation not concentration of P4 levels in 4th parity resemble to finding by Majdi et al. (2014) on goats. They reported slow elevation in p4 from 7th to 21th day until maximum level at 27th day postpartum, also found in other studies on goats (Khanum et al., 2007; Takayama et al., 2010). These differences due to breeds, managements, physiological condition of animals, seasons, and sampling days and measurement methods. (Greyling, 2000; Kascose et al., 2001).

 

The current study agrees with Sadat, (2014) who found Lambing intervals declined significantly (P<0.05) with increasing parity as well as agree with Tomomi et al. (2008) reports significant relationship between parity and the day of first ovulation after calving.

 

P4 level in the pregnancy highly than pp to increase parenchymal cells and alveoli to increase milk production after lambing (Kascose et al., 2001) therefore the twins lambing affect significantly on the P4 level in the pp in 1st parity due to effect of lactation , suckling , and maternal relationship. In spite of this result agreement with Shanaz et al. (2001) and Takayama et al. (2010) in the average postpartum interval in single and twin bearing goats, but disagree with Kascose et al. (2001), Khan & Ludri, (2002) in ewes and goats respectively.

 

Very little is known about effect of sex of lambs on the postpartum p4. The present results appear no significant effect of sex on postpartum p4, although the impact of sex of offspring on milk production was well known, which influence by low level of p4 in this period. Milk yield of male suckling ewes more than those of female suckling attributed to vigorous behavior of male vs to female that exerts more stimulation of mammary gland resultant low level of p4. (Jalal et al., 2009).

 

The study has concluded that there are no differences in the level of p4 at the time of lambing between primiparous and multiparous ewes at lambing while postpartum progesterone increases significantly with increase parity but it decrease significantly with increase number of lambing and no effects to sex of lambs on the postpartum progesterone in the Awassi ewes.

 

Recommendations

 

Its necessary to conduct multidisciplinary studies by using this breed to detect the status of hormones particularly which have specificity in the ewes’ efficiency for the purpose of formulating plans for improvement and development of the production

 

Acknowledgements

 

I would like to thank the manager of the station of sheep and goat rearing for allowing to use the place and animals in this study and for his supporting to overtake the difficulties which I faced in this study. As well as I would like to thanks the staff of the station for their extremely assistance.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

There are no possible conflicts of interest from this study.

 

References

 

• A Özpınar,·Fırat A, Aysel Özpınar (2003). Metabolic Profile of Pre-Pregnancy, Pregnancy and Early Lactation in Multiple Lambing Sakız Ewes. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 47:139–143 https://doi.org/10.1159/000070036

• AS Mc Neilly (2006). Suckling and the Control of Gonadotropin Secretion. In: Jimmy D. Neill (ed). Knobill and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. Third edition. Elsevier Academic Press, St. Louis, USA. Pp 2511-2551. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012515400-0/50051-8

• AT Cowie, Tindal JS (1971). The physiology of lactation. Edward Arnold, London

• CL Clark, Sutherl RL (1990). Progestin regulation of cellular proliferation. Endocr. Rev. 11: 266-301. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-11-2-266

• DD Reffat, Hayder M, ALI M, Hamdoun H (2012). Pospartum uterine involution and luteal activity in Farafra ewes lambing in autumn. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 58: 132.

• DE Noakes, Parkinson TJ, England GCW (2001). Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics.8th edition. Elsevier Limited, Philadelphia, USA. Pp 3-848.

• EA Jalal, Waleed, AR AL-Azzawi, Hafedh, M AL-Tayy (2009). Milk Production in Awassi Sheep and their Crosses With Assaf under Accelerated Lambing System (JZS) J. Zankoy Sulaimani. 12(1): Part A (7-12).

• EB Majdi, Sharaf EAM, Rehab MAG, Mohamed I (2014). Assessment of postpartum uterine involution and progesterone profile in Nubian goats (Capra hircus) J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 1(2): 36-41. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2014.a10

• EO Adegoke, Ezekwe AG, Agaviezor OB (2015). Effect Of Parity And Birth Type On Udder Characteristics And Milk Yield Of West African Dwarf Sheep. Int. J. Scient. Technol. Res. 4(10).

• ES Mwaaga, Janowski T (2000). Anoestrous in Dairy cows: Causes, prevalence and clinical forms. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 35: 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2000.00211.x

• GM Terán, C Alejandra Herrera, Corredor Ponciano, Pérez- Hernández, Juan Salazar-Ortiz, Jaime Gallegos Sánchez (2011). Influence of controlled suckling and male effect on the resumption of postpartum ovarian activity in Pelibuey sheep, Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 13: 493–500.

• GD Niswender, Juengel JL, Silva JP, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW (2000). Mechanisms Controlling the Function and Life Span of the Corpus Luteum. Physiol. Rev. 80: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.1

• H Takayama, Tanaka T, Kamomae H (2010). Postpartum ovarian activity and uterine involution in non-seasonal Shiba goats, with or without nursing. Small Rumin. Res. 88: 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.11.001

• JR Khan, RS Ludri (2002). Hormonal Profiles during Periparturient Period in Single and Twin Fetus Bearing Goats Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(3): 346-351.

• JS Ivan, Nadja Gomes Alves, Ana Carolina Alves, Iraides Ferreira Furusho Garcia, Felipe Barbosa Junqueira (2016). Resumption of cyclic ovarian activity in postpartum ewes: a review. Semina: Ciências Agrárias (Londrina). 37(2): 1101-1115. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1101

• J Thimonier (2000). Progesterone level analysis for the determination of the physiological status of female. Farm animals. Productions Animales-Paris-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. 13(3): 177-184.

• JG Berardinelli, J Weng, PJ Burfening, R Adair (2001). Effect of excess degradable intake protein on early embryonic development blood urea nitrogen on days 2, 3, 4 and 5 of estrous cycle in mature ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 79(1):193-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.791193x

• JD Graham, Clarke CL (1997). Physiological Action of Progesterone in Target Tissues. Endocr. Rev. 18: 502-519. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.18.4.0308

• JPC Greyling (2000). Reproduction traits in the Boar goat doe. Small Rumin. Res. 36: 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00161-3

• K Mohammed, Lawrence E, Clarence L., and Joseph A. (2007) Peripheral serum progesterone profile in multiparous Nigerian Red Sokoto goats between day one and 30 postpartum Veterinarski Arhiv. 77 (6), 543-550.

• K Shanaz, M Hussain, M Ali, SHM Cheema (2001). Reproductive efficiency and progesterone profile from parturition to parturition in Dwarf goat. Pakistan Vet. J. 21(4).

• KC Gamit, TKS Rao, NB Patel, N Kumar, SS Chaudhary, TH Solanki, TD Manat (2018). Blood biochemical and hormonal profiles vis-a-vis production performance of single and twin kid bearing Surti goats (Capra hircus). Indian J. Anim. Res. Online Published: 6-01. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-3484

• L Sivaraman, Conneely OM, Medina D (2001). P53 is a potential mediator of pregnancy and hormone-induced resistance to mammary carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:12379-12384. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.221459098

• MA Al-Ekpi, MA Ishak, AA Al-Ani (2010). Detection of uterine involution using ultrasonography in Turkish Awassiewes. Iraqi J. Agric. Sci. 41 (5): 117-124.

• M. Hayder, Ali A (2008). Factors affecting the postpartum uterine involution and luteal function of sheep in the subtropics. Small Rum. Res. 79: 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.023

• M Hayder, A Ali (2008). Factors affecting the postpartum uterine involution and luteal function of sheep in the subtropics. Small Rumin. Res. 79(2): 174-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.023

• MA Crowe (2008). Resumption of ovarian cyclicity in post-partum beef and dairy cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43 (Suppl. 5): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01210.x

• ME Oliveira, Sousa HLL, Moura ACB, Vicente WRR, Rodrigues LFS, Araújo AA (2013). The effects of parturition season and suckling mode on the puerperium of Santa Ines ewes and on the weight gain of lambs. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 65 (3). Belo Horizonte June. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352013000300035

• MR Jainudeen, Hafez ESE (2000). Gestation, prenatal physiology and parturition. In: B. Hafez and E.S.E. Hafez (Eds). Reproduction in Farm Animals.7th.Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, USA. pp 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265306.ch10

• MS Hileman, McManus CJ, Goodman RL, Jansen HT (2011) Neurons of the lateral preoptic area/rostral anterior hypothalamic area are required for photoperiodic inhibition of estrous cyclicity in Sheep. Biol. Reprod. 85:1057–1065 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.092031

• MS Medan, El-Daek T (2015). Uterine involution and progesterone level during the postpartum period in Barbary ewes in north Libya. Open Vet. J. 5(1): 18-22.

• MS Qureshi, Habib G, Nawab G, Siddiqui MM, Ahmad N, Samad HA (2000). Milk progesterone profiles in various reproductive states in dairy buffaloes under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC (B). 24(2: 70- 75)

• MA Crowe, Diskin MG, Williams EJ (2014). Parturition to resumption of ovarian cyclicity: comparative aspects of beef and dairy cows. Animal. May.8. Suppl 1:40-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000251

• McGraw-Hill Ryerson. (2007) Inquiry into Biology (Textbook).

• PJ Ball, Peters AR (2004).Reproduction in cattle. Third Edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oxford, UK. Pp. 1—237. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751091

• PL Senger (2003). Pathways to pregnancy and parturition.2nd Revised Edition. Current Conception Ltd., Washington, USA. Pp 11-345.

• RE Rubianes (1993). Ungerfeld Uterine involution and ovarian changes during early postpartum in autumn-lambing Corriedale ewes. Theriogenology. 40(2): 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90274-9

• RL Costa, Cunha EA, Fontes RS, Quirino CR, Santos LE, Bueno MS, Otero WG, Veríssimo CJ (2007). Desempenho reprodutivo de ovel has Santa Inêssubmetida sàamamentaçã o contínuaou controlada. Bolet. Indúst. Anim. 64:51-59.

• R Lamraoui, Farida FA, Bouzebda Z (2017). Resumption of Ovarian Cyclicity During Postpartum in Winter-Lambing OuledDjellal Ewes in Algerian Semi-Arid Area. Global Vet. 18 (1): 27-30.

• SA Khanum, Hussain M, Kausar R (2008). Progesterone and estradiol profiles during estrous cycle and gestation in Dwarf goat (Capra Hircus). Pak. Vet. J. 28: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.11.010

• SC Loerch, McClure KE, Parker CF (1985). Effects of number of lambs suckled and supplemental protein source on lactating ewes performance. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 6–13. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1985.6016

• S Hussain (2015). Serum progesterone analysis for monitoring estrus, pregnancy and parturition in Shami goats AL-Qadisiya J. Vet. Med. Sci. 14: 2.

• S Kaskous, E Gruen, M Mansour, A Saloum (2001). The Level of Progesterone in The Plasma of Yearling Awassi Ewes During Pregnancy and Lactation. J. Agric. Sci. Damascus university 17 (1): 98-114. (Original Research, in Arabic).

• S Sadat (2014). Reproductive performance of Djallonke sheep in the north region of. College of agriculture and natural resources faculty of agriculture department of animal science.

• SA Khanum, Hussein M, Kausar R (2007). Assessment of reproductive parameters in female Dwarf goat (Capra hircus) on the basis of progesterone profiles. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 102: 267–275.

• TG Morales, Martinez AP, Sandoval BF, Real CS, Sanchez JG (2004). Continous or restricted suckling and relationship to the length of postpartum anestrous on Pelibuey ewes. Agrociencia, Montecillo. 38(2): 165-171.

• T Tomomi, Mayumi A., Shohei O, Saya U, Takenobu K., Seungjoon K., Hideo K.(2008) Influence of parity on follicular dynamics and resumption of ovarian cycle in postpartum dairy cows. Vol. 108, Issues 1-2, P 134–143.

• W Gibb, S tephen JL, Challis JRG (2006). Parturition. In: Jimmy D. Neill (ed).Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. Third Edition. Elsevier Academic Press , St. Louis, USA . Pp 2925 -2955.

• WF Pope, KE McClure, DE Hogue, Day ML (1989). Effect of season and lactation onpostpartum fertility of Polypay, Dorset, St. Croix and Targhee ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 67(5): 1167-1174. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.6751167x

• WL Miller, Auchus RJ (2011). The molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology of human steroidogenesis and its disorders”. Endocr. Rev. 32(1): 81–151. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2010-0013

• Y Yavas, Walton JS (2000). Postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows: A review. Theriogenology. 54: 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00322-8

• Z Slawomir, Stanislaw M, Wojciech B,Tomasz J, Wiesaw S, Andrzej J, Andrzej R, Monika L (2004). Postpartum uterine involution in primiparous and pluriparous Polish long wool sheep monitored by. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 48: 2 55-257.