ResearchersLinks

Research Article · Online First, 10 November 2026 · Open Access

Effect of Dietary Lactobacillus Probiotic on the Hematology and Meat Quality of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)

· · · · ·

Affiliations & Notes ⌄
  1. 1Department of Zoology, Wildlife and Fisheries, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan
  2. 2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
  3. *Correspondence | Muhammad Zubair Anjum; Email: zubair.anjum@uaar.edu.pk
Article Info ⌄
Journal:
Pakistan Journal of Zoology
Submitted Date:
13 June 2024
Accepted Date:
19 January 2026
Published Date:
10 November 2026
Download PDF Get Rights

Abstract

The present research was performed to determine the influence of commercially obtained probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus reuteri on the growth factor, meat quality, and hematological parameters of common carp. The feeding trial lasted for 60 days. The fish samples (60) of mean weight 14±2.33 g was divided randomly into four test groups consisting of three replicates (n=5/glass tank).In this experiment four different test feeds i.e., D1 (basal feed as reference diet), D2 (L. reuteri 6g/kg as feed additive), D3 (L. rhamnosus 6g/kg as feed additive) and D4 (a consortium of L. rhamnosus 3g and L. reuteri 3g as feed additive in per kg of basal feed) were given to fish @ 5% of their body weight. The effect of probiotics were assessed in terms of determination of growth of fish, its meat quality and changes in haematological parameters. The highest weight gain and specific growth (13.43±1.14), (1.08±0.08), were noted in D3 (P<0.05) followed by D4, D2 and D1. The survival rate was observed 100% in all four treatments. The best meat status was noticed in D3 regarding crude protein, crude fat, ash content, and total moisture (55.26±1.00, 21.25±0.94, 14.46±1.03, 57.77±1.57) as compared to the reference group and other experimental groups. Overall, D3 (L. rhamnosus) shows better results of hematological parameters. The output of this research showed the significance of feed supplements containing probiotics surely improves the growth, survival rate, meat quality and hematology of common carp.

INTRODUCTION

Aquaculture is a food industry that is growing at much-accelerated rate as provides major source of protein all over the world . Southeast Asia accounts for 33% of total freshwater aquaculture with Indonesia and Vietnam producing the most (2 million metric tons) per year . With an area of 8,563,820 km2 including water lodging areas, ponds, Rivers, and Lakes, Pakistan has significant freshwater and marine water bodies for aquaculture . In Pakistan, the estimated perennial production of fish is (0.6 million metric tons) with 37% corresponding to Inland aquaculture and 63% marine aquaculture . The fisheries are not only a good source of protein but also a source of income for 0.9 and 1.7 million Pakistanis .

Cyprinus carpio is a freshwater species native to Central Asia and Eastern region of Europe . Asia accounts for 90% of Common carp production . With the increasing human population at an exponential rate there is always a concern about food security and great demand for seafood is required. Thus aquaculture is the only way to fulfill the requirement of increasing population (FAO, 2016). The inexpensive protein production methods are required to fulfill the increasing population demand; thus the application of probiotics in the aquaculture industry is efficiently meeting the requirements. Probiotics are used widely because they are safe, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective supplemented feed that can be applied to improve the use of farmed industries . Probiotics are live microorganisms that are significant for the health of Humans and Animals . The most common probiotics that are used in aqua culturing are Saccharomyces, Boulardii, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium . Nowadays the application of probiotics is very effective it is used for treatment against the pathogens, bacterial illness, and syndromes and to boost immune responses ; . These are efficient in boosting the immunomodulation in organisms by increasing the phagocytic ability against foreign bodies through antibody production .

Lactobacillus is a gram-positive bacterium it is a micro flora that is found in the gastrointestinal tract of most animals and humans. It is effective in enhancing immune protection, combating pathogens, and resisting gastrointestinal environmental changes . The dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus spp. improves resistivity against diseases, and innate immune responses and enhances growth in fish species . Many different combinations of probiotics have been used to study their impact on fish. Here we use the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri to assess their influence of variable probiotics dosage (L. rhamnosus, L. reuteri) on the growth, meat quality, and hematology of common carp.

Materials and methods

Maintenance of fish

The fingerlings of common carp (14±2.39g) obtained from the Fisheries complex at Rawal town Islamabad were stocked in twelve glass aquaria (1×1×1.5 ft) with 5 fingerlings per aquarium in a triplicate manner.

Experimental plan

Fish were given four different test feeds i.e., D1 (commercially available supplementary reference), D2 (L. reuteri 6g/kg as feed supplement), D3 (L. rhamnosus 6g/kg as feed supplement) and D4 (a consortium of L. rhamnosus 3g and L. reuteri 3g as feed supplement in per kg of basic feed). Fish were fed twice a day @ 5% mass weight for two months. The unconsumed feed pellets and faeces were pumped out daily and dirty water was exchanged with clean water after 3 days to maintain water quality. The powdered form of probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus reuteri) were purchased from the local drug store.

Assessment of fish growth

Growth performance was determined in terms of weight gain (WG), average daily weight gain (AWG), specific growth rate (SGR), percentage weight gain (%WG), final body weight (FBW), and survival rate (SR). The weighing balance was used to measure the weight of fish fortnightly. The feeding rate was governed in accordance with fish body weight throughout the trial. Growth variables was assessed by using the following formulas stated ; .

WG (g)= Final body weight (g) - initial body weight (g)

WG % = Final body weight (g) - initial body weight (g)/initial body weight (g) ×100

AWG (g/day) = Final body weight (g) - initial body weight gain (g)/Number of days

SGR (%/day) = ln final body weight (g)-ln initial body weight (g)/day×100

SR (%) = Number of fish survived/ total number of fish ×100

Proximate compositionof fish

For determining proximate composition the fish meat was used to determine crude protein, crude fat, crude ash, and total moisture percentage according to the standard protocols of AOAC. Kjeldahl and Soxhlet techniques were used for determining crude protein and crude fat. The fat content was measured using petroleum ether for 8 h, while total ash was done at 550 °C in muffle oven for 12 h. The moisture content was examined by heating the samples in the oven at 60° C in dry dishes for one hour. The moisture content was calculated as follows.

% moisture = Final weight - Initial weight/ initial weight ×100

Hematological analysis

Blood samples were collected through cardiac puncture by using a 2cc syringe heparin-coated EDTA tubes. Red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC) were counted by diluting blood with Rees solution and placed under the Neubauer chamber this was practiced according to Svobodova et al. (1991). Hemoglobin was measured by cyanmethemoglobin method using test kits. The mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was determined using hematological data , MCHC = (Hb/ Ht) × 100 .

Statistical analysis

The result was examined by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) for recognition of significant differences within the treated groups by using SPSS software (version 16.0). The results were displayed as means ± standard deviation (SD), the significant dissimilarity within the treated group at P<0.05.

Results

Growth performance

Table I shows that overall fish groups fed with supplemented diet with addition of probiotic showed improved growth (P<0.05) than the control group without probiotics in feed. Higher values of WG (13.43±1.14), SGR (1.08±0.08), %WG (92.91±9.52), and AWG (0.22±0.02) observed in D3 group treated with 6g of L. rhamnosus per kg of basal diet followed by D4, D2 and D1 group. The survival rate was 100% in all groups.

Proximate composition

Table II shows proximate composition viz. moisture, crude proteins, total ash, and crude fat of C. carpio. The notable higher moisture content was found in D1 (66.33 ±0.57) followed by D2 (63.30±0.99), D4 (60.31±0.88) and D3 (57.77±1.57). Crude protein was found to significantly increase in D3 (55.26 ±1.00), (P< 0.05) than in D4 (52.87±1.52), D2 (50.16±0.95) and D1 (46.83±1.48). The significantly higher percentage of crude fat (32.43 ±0.90), and ash content (22.60 ±1.46) was noted in control group D1 as compared to D2, and D4, and D3, respectively.

Table I. Growth performance and survival rate of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed with different experimental diets.

Growth parameters

D1

D2

D3

D4

IBW(g)

14.76±0.85

14.73±1.98

14.78±0.14

14.75±0.09

FBW(g)

19.26±1.01d

21.80±1.49c

27.88±1.24a

24.94±1.47b

WG (g)

4.50±0.35d

7.06±0.73c

13.43±1.14a

10.21±0.82b

AWG (g/day)

0.07±0.10d

0.11±0.01c

0.22±0.02a

0.16±0.01b

WG(%)

30.52±2.49d

48.81±10.24c

92.91±9.52a

69.44±5.64b

SGR (%/day)

0.44±0.03d

0.65±0.11c

1.08±0.08a

0.86±0.07b

SR (%)

100

100

100

100

Means in the same row with dissimilar superscripts a, b, c and d is remarkably different (P< 0.05). IBM, average initial body weight; FBW, average final body weight; WG, weight gain; AWG, average daily weight gain; WG (%), percentage weight gain; SGR, specific growth rate; SR, survival rate.D1 basal die; D2, basal diet + 6g L. reuteri/kg; D3, basal diet + 6g L. rhamnosus/kg; D4, basal diet + 3g L. reuteri and 3g L. rhamnosus (consortium). Data is showed as mean± standard deviation.

Table II. Effect of commercial probiotics on proximate composition (mean± standard deviation) of common carp.

Treatments

D1

D2

D3

D4

Crude protein

46.83 ±1.48d

50.16 ±0.95c

55.26 ±1.00a

52.87 ±1.52b

Total ash

22.60 ±1.46a

19.87± 1.46b

14.46± 1.03d

17.25± 0.96c

Moisture

66.33± 0.57a

63.30 ±0.99b

57.77 ±1.57d

60.31 ±0.88c

Crude fats

32.43 ±0.90a

24.32± 0.94b

21.25±0.94c

23.32± 0.88b

Means standard deviation in the same row with different superscripts is notably different (P <0.05). D1 basal diet; D2, basal diet + 6g L.reuteri/kg; D3, basal diet + 6g L. rhamnosus/kg; D4, basal diet + 3g L. reuteri and 3g L. rhamnosus (consortium).

Table III. Effect of supplemented probiotics on hematological parameters (mean standard deviation) of common carp.

Parameters

D1

D2

D3

D4

RBC×106 (cell/mm3)

1.14±0.15d

2.28±0.18c

3.30±0.31a

2.76±0.29b

Hb (g/dL-1)

4.74±0.70c

6.15±0.5b

8.86±0.76a

7.86±0.92a

Hct (%)

17.33±2.51c

19.66±0.57bc

24.33±2.08a

23.00±2.64ab

WBC×104 (cell/mm3)

2.15±0.13d

2.88±0.30c

4.62±0.39a

3.62±0.52b

MCHC (g/dl)

27.37±0.23d

31.30±0.90c

36.40±0.28a

34.16±0.26b

Red blood cell (RBC); Hemoglobin (Hb); Hematocrit (Hct); White blood cell (WBC); Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC). Means in the same row with different superscripts a, b, c, and d are significantly different (P< 0.05).

Hematological parameters

Table III shows hematological parameters at the end of the growth period. The highest values of Hb, MCHC, RBCs and WBC were observed in D3 group as 8.86±0.76, 36.40±0.28, 3.30±0.31, and 4.62±0.39 respectively. The blood parameters were all significantly higher in probiotics fed groups D2, D3, and D4 than control groups (ANOVA: P <0.05).

Discussion

Probiotics are now being widely used in the aquaculture industry as it increase the growth and production of cultivated species . In aquaculture, probiotics surely increase the growth performance and health of fish . The dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus spp. improves resistivity against diseases, and innate immune responses and enhances growth in fish species .The impact of L. rhamnosus GG on grass carp was determined on experimental groups and the results showed improved growth and morphometric parameters . In the current study, the fish fed with addition of probiotics showed improved growth performance, meat quality, and hematological parameters in aliens with the application of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum in carp feed improves growth variables, immunophysiological responses, and disease resistivity in common carp . The increase in growth parameters like SGR, WG, FBW, and AWG were also observed in Cyprinus carpio . Zhang et al. (2019) used Lactobacillus delbrueckii as a feed additive in diet resulting the improved growth performance and intestinal enzyme activities in common carp. Probiotics Lactobacillus acidophilus and a mix of Bifidobacterium animalis sub spp. Lactis with Bifidobacterium longum sub spp used as feed supplement have been found to have improved effect on the proximate composition of lamb . Jan et al. (2023) performed trial on grass carp and used probiotic L. rhamnosus as supplementary diet, the outcomes suggested improved meat quality parameters, similar results were noted in present study. Improved protein content by dietary administration of probiotics in common carp and rainbow trout were also observed previously ; . Bisht et al. (2012) examined the effect of B. subtilis (4×108 cells 100/g) mixed with rice bran as a diet, the findings showed lower moisture content while higher lipid and protein contents in the experimental diet as compared to reference group. The outcomes of our study were the same as previous studies reported of enhanced crude protein content and other parameters in the experimental feed having probiotics as compared to control diet without addition of probiotics ; . The crude protein parameter showed greater values due to (1) improved digestion, (2) more feed intake, and (3) higher nutritional absorption in the body . The D3 group (6g/kg L. rhamnosus) also showed improved meat quality parameters due to the dietary administration of probiotics. The findings of this trial were same to the outcome of previous work done on common carp which suggested improved growth due to probiotic supplementary diet of different concentrations ; . Mohammadian et al. (2020) conducted research to determine the effect of Lactobacillus bulgaricus(108 CFU g-1) on hematology and immunological parameters, and the result showed improved blood variables in the probiotic fed diet than control group. The hematological parameters (Ht, PCV, MCV, MCH, MCHC and TLC) significantly increased in the experimental fed diet consist of L. plantarum than the control group in common carp . The greater value of Hct indicates better health conditions in fish . The use of a consortium of probiotics (B. cereus and B. subtilis) in diet improves the value of Hct and Hb in Nile tilapia . The probiotics-supplemented diet using L. acidophilus in Rainbow trout improves RBC and disease resistance in the experimental as compared to the reference group . The probiotics-based diet improve the WBC level, fish respond better to stressors and immune defense is enhanced . The findings of our study explored the improvement in blood variables due to a probiotic supplementary diet, the results were supported by previous studies done on common carp .

Conclusion

Common carp fed with commercial probiotic showed better results than control diet. The dietary administration of L. rhamnosus added as 6g/kg in supplementary diet showed better growth progress, meat quality, and hematological parameters. Hence further work still needs to be done to evaluate its certain quantity for common carp.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Maqsood Jan for his support and guidance during the study.

Funding

The study received no external funds.

Authors’ Contribution

MZA and SA supervised the research work. MI and MQK provided support with data curation. The experiment was conducted by UH. MF helped with statistical analysis. UH processed the data and wrote manuscript.

IRB approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board of PMAS Arid Agriculture University.

Ethical statement

In our research work, we have adopted all the guidelines authorized by the ethics committee of Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi.

Generative AI and AI-assisted technology statement

The authors declare that no generative AI and AI assisted technology was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Tawwab, M., Abdel-Rahman, A.M. and Ismael, N.E., 2008. Evaluation of commercial live bakers’ yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a growth and immunity promoter for Fry Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) challenged in situ with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture, 280: 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.03.055 [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmad, A., Abdullah, S.R.S., Hasan, H.A., Othman, A.R. and Ismail, N.I., 2021. Aquaculture industry: Supply and demand, best practices, effluent and its current issues and treatment technology. Environ. Manage., 287: 112271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112271 [CrossRef]
  3. Alvarez-Olmos, M.I. and Oberhelman, R.A., 2001. Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis., 32: 1567-1576. https://doi.org/10.1086/320518 [CrossRef]
  4. Amman, H., Muzaffar, I. and Fatima, S., 2020. Assessment of processing, production and export of fish meal in Pakistan. Int. J. Fish. aquat. Stud.,
  5. Anee, I.J., Alam, S., Begum, R.A., Shahjahan, R.M. and Khandaker, A.M., 2021. The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. J. Basic appl. Zool., 82: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-021-00250-x [CrossRef]
  6. Asadian, M., Shahsavani, D. and Kazerani, H.R., 2015. Growth promoting effects of a multi-strain probiotic on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Iran. J. Vet. Sci. Technol., 7: 63-74.
  7. Bisht, A., Singh, U.P. and Pandey, N., 2012. Bacillus subtilis as a potent probiotic for enhancing growth in fingerlings of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Indian J. Fish., 59: 103–107.
  8. Blaxhall, P. and Daisley, K., 1973. Routine hematological methods for use with fish blood. J. Fish Biol., 5: 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1973.tb04510.x [CrossRef]
  9. Cabello, F.C., 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol., 8: 1137-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x [CrossRef]
  10. Dehaghani, P.G., Baboli, M.J., Moghadam, A.T., Ziaei-Nejad, S. and Pourfarhadi, M., 2015. Effect of synbiotic dietary supplementation on survival, growth performance, and digestive enzyme activities of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 60: 224–232. https://doi.org/10.17221/8172-CJAS [CrossRef]
  11. Doron, S. and Gorbach, S.L., 2006. Probiotics: their role in the treatment and prevention of disease. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther., 4: 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.4.2.261 [CrossRef]
  12. El-Kady, A.A., Magouz, F.I., Mahmoud, S.A. and Abdel-Rahim, M.M., 2022. The effects of some commercial probiotics as water additive on water quality, fish performance, blood biochemical parameters, expression of growth and immune-related genes, and histology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 546: 737249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737249 [CrossRef]
  13. El-Saadony, M.T., Alagawany, M., Patra, A.K., Kar, I., Tiwari, R., Dawood, M.A. and Abdel-Latif, H.M., 2021. The functionality of probiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Fish. Shellf. Immunol., 117: 36-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.07.007 [CrossRef]
  14. FAO, 2016. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i5555e [CrossRef]
  15. Faramarzi, M., Kiaalvandi, S., Lashkarbolooki, M. and Iranshahi, F., 2011. The investigation of Lactobacillus acidophilus as probiotics on growth performance and disease resistance of rainbow trout (Oncorhychus mykiss). http://www.idosi.org/aejsr/6(1)11/6.pdf, https://doi.org/10.3923/aj.2011.294.298 [CrossRef]
  16. Farooq, M., Anjum, M.Z., Muhammad, Z., Jan, M., Azhar, M.S., Rasool, S. and Khan, M.Q., 2023. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG supplementation on the growth performance, survival rate and morphometry of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Pakistan J. Zool., 57: 183-190. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20230207160248 [CrossRef]
  17. Forester, T.S. and Lawrence, J.M., 1978. Effects of grass carp and carp on populations of bluegill and largemouth bass in ponds. Am. Fish. Soc., 107: 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1978)107<172:EOGCAC>2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]
  18. Gallaugher, P.E., 1994. The role of haematocrit in oxygen transport and swimming in salmonid fishes, Simon Fraser University.
  19. Garcia-Marengoni, N., Cézar de Moura, M., Escocard de Oliveira, N.T., Bombardelli, R.A. and Menezes-Albuquerque, D., 2015. Use of probiotics Bacillus cereus var.toyoi and Bacillus subtilis C-3102 in the diet of juvenile Nile Tilapia cultured in cages. Lat. Am. J. aquacult. Res., 43: 601-606. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol43-issue3-fulltext-23 [CrossRef]
  20. Hargreaves, J.A., 1998. Nitrogen biogeochemistry of aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture, 166: 181-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00298-1 [CrossRef]
  21. Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G.R., Merenstein, D.J., Pot, B. and Salminen, S., 2014. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 11: 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 [CrossRef]
  22. Hooshyar, Y., Abedian, K.A., Paknejad, H. and Gandomi, H., 2020. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 on different parameters related to health status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the protection against Yersinia ruckeri. Probiot. Antimicrb. Proteins, 12: 1370-1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09645-8 [CrossRef]
  23. Jan, M., Anjum, M.Z., Muhammad, Z., Farooq, M., Khan, M.Q. and Akhter, S., 2023. Effect of commercially available probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on the body composition of grass carp fingerlings. Pakistan J. Zool., 56: 2189-2194. https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20230124170136 [CrossRef]
  24. Jarwar, A., 2008. A status overview of fisheries and aquaculture development in Pakistan with context to other Asian countries. Aquac. Asia, 13: 13-18.
  25. Kanwal, Z. and Tayyeb, A., 2019. Role of dietary probiotic Ecotec in growth enhancement, thyroid tuning, hematomorphology and resistance to pathogenic challenge in Labeo rohita juveniles. J. appl. Anim. Res., 47: 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1650050 [CrossRef]
  26. Kayansamruaj, P., Areechon, N. and Unajak, S., 2020. Development of fish vaccine in Southeast Asia: A challenge for the sustainability of SE Asia aquaculture. Fish Shellf. Immunol., 103: 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.04.031 [CrossRef]
  27. Khan, M.N., Shahzad, K., Chatta, A., Sohail, M., Piria, M. and Treer, T., 2016. A review of introduction of common carp Cyprinus carpio in Pakistan: origin, purpose, impact and management. Croat. J. Fish., 74: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjf-2016-0016 [CrossRef]
  28. Kobayashi, M., De Fontaubert, C., Miranda Montero, J.J., Brandon, C.J. and Arnason, R., 2016. The sunken billions revisited: Progress and challenges in global marine fisheries-overview. The World Bank, Washington DC, ISBN: 978-1-4648-0919-4. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0919-4 [CrossRef]
  29. Macintyre, A. and Childscymet, T., 2005. Probiotics The benefits of bacterial cultures. Comp. Ther., 31: 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1385/COMP:31:3:181 [CrossRef]
  30. Martínez-Cruz, P., Ibáñez, A.L., Monroy, H.O.A. and Ramírez, S.H.C., 2012. Use of probiotics in aquaculture. Int. Sch. Res. Notices, 2012 https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/916845. [CrossRef]
  31. Mohammadian, T., Dezfuly, Z.T., Motlagh, R.G., Jangaran-Nejad, A., Hosseini, S.S., Khaj, H. and Alijani, N., 2020. Effect of encapsulated lactobacillus bulgaricus on innate immune system and hematological parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), post-administration of Pb. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins, 12: 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09544-7 [CrossRef]
  32. Munir, M.B., Hashim, R., Nor, S.A.M. and Marsh, T.L., 2018. Effect of dietary prebiotics and probiotics on snakehead (Channa striata) health: Haematology and disease resistance parameters against Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 75: 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.02.005 [CrossRef]
  33. Pandey, A., Tyagi, A. and Khairnar, S.O., 2022. Oral feed-based administration of Lactobacillus plantarum enhances growth, haematological and immunological responses in Cyprinus carpio. Emerg. Anim. Species, 3: 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eas.2022.100003 [CrossRef]
  34. Reid, G., Jass, J., Sebulsky, M.T. and McCormick, J.K., 2003. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 16: 658-672. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.4.658-672.2003 [CrossRef]
  35. Rico, A., Oliveira, R., McDonough, S., Matser, A., Khatikarn, J., Satapornvanit, K. and Van den Brink, P.J., 2014. Use, fate and ecological risks of antibiotics applied in tilapia cage farming in Thailand. Environ. Pollut., 191: 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.04.002 [CrossRef]
  36. Santillo, A., Annicchiarico, G., Caroprese, M., Marino, R., Sevi, A. and Albenzio, M., 2012. Probiotics in milk replacer influence lamb immune function and meat quality. J. Anim., 6: 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001571 [CrossRef]
  37. Santos, L. and Ramos, F., 2018. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 52: 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.010 [CrossRef]
  38. Soltani, M., Abdy, E., Alishahi, M., Mirghaed, A.T. and Hosseini-Shekarabi, P., 2017. Growth performance, immune-physiological variables and disease resistance of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) orally subjected to different concentrations of Lactobacillus plantarum. Aquacult. Int., 25: 1913-1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0164-8 [CrossRef]
  39. Son, V.M., Chang, C.C., Wu, M.C., Guu, Y.K., Chiu, C.H. and Cheng, W., 2009. Dietary administration of the probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum, enhanced the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 26: 691-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2009.02.018 [CrossRef]
  40. Svobodova, Z., Pravda, D. and Palackova, J., 1991. Unified methods of haematological examination of fish. Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology. pp. 3.
  41. Tessema, A., Getahun, A., Mengistou, S., Fetahi, T. and Dejen, E., 2020. Reproductive biology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) in Lake Hayq, Ethiopia. Fish Aquat. Sci., 23: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-020-00162-x [CrossRef]
  42. van Baarlen, P., Wells, J.M. and Kleerebezem, M., 2013. Regulation of intestinal homeostasis and immunity with probiotic lactobacilli. Trends Immunol., 34: 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2013.01.005 [CrossRef]
  43. Varela, J., Ruiz-Jarabo, I., Vargas-Chacoff, L., Arijo, S., León-Rubio, J., García-Millán, I. and Mancera, J., 2010. Dietary administration of probiotic Pdp11 promotes growth and improves stress tolerance to high stocking density in gilthead seabream Sparus auratus. Aquaculture., 309: 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.029 [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, Y., Wang, Y. and Lin, J., 2014. Use of Bacillus coagulans as a dietary probiotic for the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. J. World Aquacult. Soc., 45: 403-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12139 [CrossRef]
  45. Yanbo, W. and Zirong, X., 2006. Effect of probiotics for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 127: 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.09.003 [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Fan, W., Huang, M. and Liu, M., 2019. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus delbrueckii on growth performance, body composition, digestive and absorptive capacity, and gene expression of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Huanghe var). Aquacult. Nutr., 25: 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12840 [CrossRef]