Antibacterial Sodium Alginate Cosmetic Herbal Electrospun Nanofiber Mask
Ayesha Saeed1*, Farzana Kishwar2, Ahsan Nazir3, Sharjeel Abid4, Muhammad Abiodullah5, and Danial Ali6
1University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; 2Govt. College for Women Baghbanpura, Lahore, Pakistan; 3Research Innovation and Commercialization, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 4Department of Textile Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 5Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; 6Akhtar Saeed Medical College Lahore, Pakistan.
Figure 1:
FTIR Spectrum of (a) pure PVA, SA and HRS leaf extract, (b) pure PVA SA/PVA8, SAHRS1, SAHRS2 and SAHRS3 nanofibers at different concentrations.
Figure 2:
FTIR Spectrum of (a) pure PVA, SA and MA leaf extract, (b) pure PVA, SA/PVA8, SAMA1, SAMA2 and SAMA3 nanofibers at different concentrations.
Figure 3:
XRD pattern of (a) pure PVA, SA and HRS (b) pure PVA, SA/PVA8, SAHRS1, SAHRS2 and SAHRS3 Nanofibers.
Figure 4:
XRD pattern of (a) pure PVA, SA and MA (b) pure PVA, SA/PVA8, SAMA1, SAMA2 and SAMA3 Nanofibers.
Figure 5:
SEM images of nanofibers at different ratios of SA/PVA at magnification level of (a) 10000, (b) 5000, (c) 1000, (d) 5000, (e) 10,000.
Figure 6:
SEM images (magnification level of 30x) of SA/PVA8 nanofibers and Diameter distribution.
Figure 7:
SEM images (magnification level of 30x) of SAHRS1, SAHRS2, SAHRS3 nanofibers at 0.5, 1 and 1.5% concentrations and Diameter distribution.
Figure 8:
SEM images (magnification level of 30x) of SAMA1, SAMA2, SAMA3 nanofibers at 0.5, 1 and 1.5% concentrations and Diameter distribution
Figure 9:
Antibacterial activity of with and without laef extract nanofibers against S. aureus and E. coli.