Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Heritability and Selection Response for Grain Yield and Associated Traits in F3 Wheat Populations

SJA_34_4_767-774

 

 

 

Research Article

Heritability and Selection Response for Grain Yield and Associated Traits in F3 Wheat Populations

Tariq Aziz1, Iftikhar Hussain Khalil1, Quaid Hussain1,3*, Tariq Shah2,3, Nazir Ahmad1 and Amir Sohail1

1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics; 2Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; 3Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430062, China.

Abstract | Broad sense heritability and selection responses were assessed for grain yield and related traits in 12 F3 populations of wheat got from mating of six advanced lines and two widely cultivated cultivars (Pirsabak-08 and Janbaz) at University of Agriculture, Peshawar during 2013-14. All wheat genotypes (8 parents and 12 F3 populations) showed significant differences for all traits. Cultivar Janbaz had maximum spike length (13.9 cm) and maximum number of grains spike-1 (89.2). Parental line B-IV(N)5 had maximum single spike weight (4.6 g), 100-grain weight (4.6 g) and grain yield (32.0 g plant-1). F3 population B-RF7 × Janbaz had 100-grain weight (4.5 g) and grain yield (31.9 g plant-1). Similarly, F3 population B-RF1 × Janbaz had more single spike weight (4.1 g). Population B-RF3 × Janbaz had maximum spike length (14.5 cm) and number of grains spike-1 (85.1). F3 populations B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08, B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08, B-RF7 × Janbaz, B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08, B-RF7 × Janbaz, B-RF1 × Janbaz, B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz had maximum heritability and selection responses for plant height (0.76 and 10.96 cm), spike length (0.93 and 4.51 cm), grains spike-1 (0.93 and 25.54), single spike weight (0.89 and 3.08 g), 100 grain weight (0.90 and 1.26 g) and grain yield plant-1 (0.75 and 12.15 g), respectively. On basis of high heritability coupled with high selection response for yield related traits, F3 populations B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08, B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz, B-RF1 × Janbaz and B-RF7 × Janbaz should be advanced further for possible development of high yielding wheat cultivars.


Received | May 13, 2017; Accepted | September 24, 2018; Published | November 06, 2018

*Correspondence | Quaid Hussain, Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430062, China; Email: quaid_hussain@yahoo.com

Citation | Aziz, T., I.H. Khalil, Q. Hussain, T. Shah, N. Ahmad and A. Sohail. 2018. Heritability and selection response for grain yield and associated traits in f3 wheat populations. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 34(4): 767-774.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.4.767.774

Keywords | Heritability, Selection response, F3 populations, Wheat, Advance lines



Introduction

Wheat has always been under major research to improve its grain production as well as quality. However, there is still broad space for genetic improvement of wheat to meet the developing necessities of the expanding population. Genetic exploitation is the most ideal approach to increase wheat production. In this way, it is essential to study the hereditary changes and mode of inheritance of distinctive parameters for effective wheat breeding projects (Ijaz and Khan, 2009). Wheat breeders are attempting to grow new cultivars which are high yielding, drought tolerant and have resistance against diseases and insects/pests. Wheat breeders are generally selecting required genotypes in initial filial generations when a trait has high heritability or late selection until advanced filial generations, when the offspring are nearly homozygous. Direct assessment of yield is mostly difficult in initial generation selection. So, plant breeders are selecting those traits which ultimately increase yield. Breeding yield traits to increase grain yield is more efficient way if these traits are highly heritable and positively correlated with grain yield. The selection measures for increasing production may be yield or one or more parameters of yield like number of spikes per unit area, grains spike-1 and grain weight (Donmez et al., 2001). Heritability provides selection response, which help in predicting performance in the next generation for effective breeding programs. Various approaches have been adopted to improve yield potential of wheat (Ahmedi and Bajelan, 2008; Siddiqui et al., 1991). High heritability associated with high selection response play a major role in selecting high yielding genotypes, because high heritability with high selection response has additive genetic variation for character of interest (Iqbal and Khan, 2003). Current research was planned to compare performance and to determine heritability and selection response for yield and its contributing traits from variances of parents and 12 F3 populations as well as from expected mean squares of ANOVA.

Materials and Methods

In this study, eight parental wheat cultivars/lines and their 12 F3 populations were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications. A plot for each genotype had two rows, each 3-meter long. Row to row and plant to plant distance for each parental and F3 population in a replication was 30 and 10 cm, respectively. Urea and DAP fertilizers were applied to provide 120 kg N and 60 kg P ha-1. Half of N and full dose of P was applied at sowing time, while the remaining N was applied at tillering stage.

Statistical analysis

The average data of 8 parental lines/cultivars and 12 F3 population was subjected to analysis of variance for RCB design by Singh and Chaudhary (1985).

Heritability and selection response for traits were estimated by two methods as explained below.

Using variances of parents and F3 populations

Using variances of parental lines/cultivars and F3 populations, broad sense heritability for yield and its contributing traits was computed for each cross combination using the following formula an analogy of Mahmud and Kramer (1951).

Eq1.PNG

Where;

VF3 = Variance derived from 30 plants of a specific F3 population for a trait; Vp1 and Vp2 = Variance resulting from 15 plants each of parent 1 and parent 2 of a specific F3 population; Expected selection response (Re) was calculated for all traits pertaining to each of the 12 F3 populations using the following method (Fehr, 1993).

Image21257657.PNG 

Where;

Re = Expected selection response; i = 1.40 at 20% selection intensity; Vp = phenotypic variance of a trait; h2B.S = broad sense heritability for a trait.

Thus, for each trait there were 12 values of heritability and selection responses, each pertaining to a different F3 population. This helped in identification of F3 populations with a potential to produce desirable segregants in succeeding generations.

Using expected mean squares

For each trait, genetic and environmental variances was also computed from the expected mean squares as follows:

Genetic variance = Vg = (M2 - M6)/r

Environmental variance = Ve = M6

Phenotypic variance = Vp = Vg+ Ve

Heritability = Vg / Vp

Image21257658.PNG 

Where;

i = 1.4 at 20% selection intensity; Vp = phenotypic variance for a specific trait; h2 = heritability for a specific trait

Results and Discussion

Plant height (cm)

Mean squares were highly significant in wheat genotypes, parents and F3 population (P = 0.01) for plant height, while parents vs F3 populations contrast was non-significant (Table 1). Plant height ranged from 76.2 to 109.9 cm among parents. Parental line B-RF3 had maximum plant height (109.9 cm), while Pirsabak-08 had minimum plant height (76.2 cm) among parents. Among F3 populations, plant height ranged

Table 1: Mean squares for different traits of 20 wheat genotypes (8 parents and 12 F3 populations).

Source Df Plant height Spike length Single spike weight

Number of grains spike-1

100-grain

weight

Grain yield

plant-1

Replication 2

112.46ns

1.46ns

15.26ns

9.42ns

0.37*

15.26ns

Genotypes 19 276.72** 1.38** 39.17** 79.26** 0.36** 39.17**
Parents 7 388.52** 1.96** 40.74*

44.51ns

0.60** 40.74*

F3 Pops

11 230.28**

0.80ns

12.97ns

58.93*

0.16ns

12.97ns

Parents vs F3 Pops

1

4.87 ns

3.62* 316.37** 546.12** 0.71* 316.37**
Error 38 35.94 0.51 12.59 24.08 0.11 12.59
CV (%) - 6.17 5.40 14.49 6.36 8.87 14.49

*, **: Significant at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively; ns: Non-significant.

from 80.3 to 112.8 cm (Table 3). Maximum plant height (112.8 cm) was recorded for F3 population B-RF1 × Janbaz while minimum plant height (80.3 cm) was recorded for B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08. Yield components and some morphological characters were studied in an experiment comprising 42 winter wheat genotypes by Khalil et al. (2011). They reported highly significant differences among the wheat genotypes for plant height which is in accordance to our findings.

Table 2: Heritability (ℎ2) and expected selection response (Re) derived from expected mean squares of 20 wheat genotypes (8 parents and 12 F3 populations).

Trait Vg Ve

2

Re

Plant height (cm) 80.26 35.94 0.69 10.42
Spike length (cm) 0.29 0.51 0.36 0.45
Single spike weight (g) 0.14 0.21 0.41 0.34

Grains spike-1 (no)

18.39 24.08 0.43 3.95
100- grain weight (g) 0.08 0.11 0.43 0.26

Grain yield plant-1 (g)

8.86 12.59 0.41 2.68

 

Variances for plant height ranged from 24.4 to 74.3 among Parents (Table 4). Minimum variance (24.4) was obtained for parental line B-RF7 and maximum (74.3) for parental line B-IV(N)12. Variances among F3 populations for plant height ranged from 43.5 to 135.6. Hence, variances among F3 populations were greater in magnitude than parental lines. Maximum variance (135.6) for plant height among F3 population was observed for B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08, while minimum variance (43.5) for B-RF7 × Janbaz (Table 4). Heritability of plant height ranged from 0.20 to 0.76 with selection responses of 2.11 to 10.96 cm (Table 3). Maximum heritability (0.76) with maximum selection response (10.96 cm) was observed for F3 population B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08. In contrast, lowest heritability (0.20) coupled with minimum selection response (2.11 cm) for plant height was observed for F3 population B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08. Using expected mean squares from ANOVA of plant height broad sense heritability was 0.69 along with selection response of 10.42 (Table 2). High heritability values were also reported by Ikramullah et al. (2011) for plant height in wheat genotypes in irrigated (0.85) as well as non-irrigated (0.87) environment. Baloch et al. (2013) and Bilgin et al. (2011) have also recorded high heritability (0.99 and 0.92, respectively) for plant height in wheat genotypes.

Spike length (cm)

Significant differences were observed among the wheat genotypes (P = 0.01), parents (P=0.01) and parents vs F3 population contrast (P=0.05) for spike length. However, differences among F3 populations were non-significant for spike length (Table 1). Spike length ranged from 11.8 to 13.9 cm among parents (Table 3). Parental line B-IV(N)5 and cultivar Janbaz had maximum spike length (13.9 cm), while B-IV(N)11 had minimum spike length (11.8 cm) among parents. Among F3 populations, spike length ranged from 12.8 to 14.5 cm (Table 3). Thus, spike length was more in F3 population than the parental line. Maximum spike length (14.5 cm) was recorded for population B-RF3 × Janbaz, while B-RF1 × Pirsabak-08 had minimum spike length (12.8 cm). El-Shafi (2013) has also reported significant differences among wheat genotypes and their three generations (F2, F3 and F4) for spike length.

Variances among parents for spike length ranged from 0.4 to 2.4 (Table 3). Maximum variance (2.4) was recorded for wheat parental lines B-RF1 and B-RF3 and minimum (0.4) for parental line B-RF7. Variances among F3 populations for spike length ranged from 1.6 to 12.1 (Table 3). F3 population

Table 3: Mean values for different traits of 20 wheat genotypes (8 parents and 12 F3 populations).

Genotypes Plant height

(cm)

Spike length

(cm)

Single spike weight (g)

Number of grains spike-1

100-grain weight (g) Grain yield plant-1 (g)

I. Parents
B-IV(N)11 86.9 11.8 3.9 81.1 3.8 31.2
B-VI(N)5 99.3 13.9 4.6 81.3 4.6 32.0
B-VI(N)12 106.9 13.3 4.4 78.5 4.3 31.5
B-RF1 108.2 12.9 3.9 79.4 3.6 28.6
B-RF3 109.9 13.3 3.6 83.1 3.6 30.6
B-RF7 97.3 12.7 3.3 77.5 3.4 32.0
Pirsabak-08 76.2 11.9 3.4 77.8 3.4 31.3
Janbaz 96.9 13.9 4.3 89.2 4.1 31.2
Parents Mean 97.7 13.0 3.9 81.0 3.9 31.1

II. F3 Populations

B-IV(N)11 × Pirsabak-08 92.3 12.9 3.3 72.6 3.3 29.9
B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz 96.9 13.7 3.1 70.9 3.4 30.1
B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 80.3 13.4 3.6 75.6 3.6 30.8
B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz 94.4 14.0 3.5 72.0 3.7 29.4
B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08 97.5 13.0 3.6 80.3 3.7 31.2
B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz 91.6 13.1 3.4 73.1 3.5 30.1
B-RF1 × Pirsabak-08 98.4 12.8 3.3 73.2 3.7 30.9
B-RF1 × Janbaz 112.8 13.7 4.1 77.8 3.9 31.7
B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08 88.9 13.1 3.5 75.0 3.7 31.2
B-RF3 × Janbaz 100.0 14.5 3.8 85.1 3.7 31.8
B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08 100.6 13.7 3.2 71.2 3.7 30.4
B-RF7 × Janbaz 111.5 13.5 3.9 69.8 4.5 31.9

F3 Mean

97.1 13.5 3.5 74.7 3.7 30.8
LSD (5%) 9.9 1.2 0.8 8.1 0.5 5.9

 

B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 had maximum variance (12.1), while minimum variance (1.6) was recorded in populations B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08 and B-RF1 × Janbaz for spike length. Estimates of heritability and selection response for spike length ranged from 0.20 to 0.93 and 0.37 to 4.51 cm, respectively. F3 population B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 exhibited highest heritability (0.90) with selection response of 4.51 cm. In contrast, F3 population B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz had minimum heritability of 0.20 with selection response of 0.39 cm for spike length. While minimum selection response was observed for F3 population B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08. Using expected mean squares, spike length had 0.36 heritability with selection response of 0.45 cm (Table 2). Ijaz and Khan (2009) assessed six F2 populations involving five wheat varieties/lines and recorded moderate heritability (0.52) for spike length.

Single spike weight (g)

Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the wheat genotypes (P = 0.01), parents (P = 0.05), and parents vs F3 populations contrast (P = 0.01), however non-significant differences were observed among F3 populations for single spike weight (Table 1). Among parents, single spike weight ranged from 3.3 to 4.6 g (Table 3). Maximum spike weight (4.6 g) was recorded for parental line B-IV(N)5, while minimum (3.3 g) for parental line B-RF7. Among F3 populations, spike weight ranged from 3.1 to 4.1 g (Table 3). Population B-RF1 × Janbaz had maximum spike weight (4.1 g), while population B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz had minimum (3.1 g). Thus, spike weight of F3 population was lower than parental lines. A set of 28 elite wheat lines was assessed in a randomized complete block design with factorial treatment (unclipped and clipped) by Khalil et al. (2008) and Shuja et al. (2010) evaluated six spring wheat genotypes (Pirsbak-85, Dera-98, Ghaznavi-98, Fakhr-e-Sarhad, Takbeer and SARC-3) and reported significant differences among wheat genotypes for single spike weight.

Table 4: Variances, heritability (ℎ2) and expected selection response (Re) for different traits of 12 F3 populations derived from 8 wheat parents.

Genotypes Plant height (cm) Spike length (cm) Single spike weight (g)
  Variance

2

Re

Variance

2

Re

Variance

2

Re

I. Parents
B-IV(N)11 32.2 - - 2.3 - - 0.5 - -
B-VI(N)5 72.2 - - 0.8 - - 0.9 - -
B-VI(N)12 74.3 - - 1.6 - - 0.8 - -
B-RF1 58.0 - - 2.4 - - 1.3 - -
B-RF3 29.2 - - 2.4 - - 0.4 - -
B-RF7 24.4 - - 0.4 - - 0.5 - -
Pirsabak-08 27.6 - - 1.0 - - 0.3 - -
Janbaz 37.8 - - 0.5 - - 0.8 - -

II. F3 Populations

B-IV(N)11 × Pirsabak-08 62.9 0.53 5.84 2.1 0.28 0.56 2.4 0.84 1.82
B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz 69.5 0.50 5.81 2.5 0.57 1.26 4.9 0.87 2.70
B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 135.6 0.67 10.94 12.1 0.93 4.51 4.0 0.87 2.44
B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz 111.8 0.73 10.86 1.9 0.20 0.39 2.5 0.85 1.87
B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08 56.6 0.20 2.11 1.6 0.21 0.37 3.0 0.84 2.03
B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz 83.6 0.37 4.69 3.4 0.74 1.90 4.7 0.83 2.52
B-RF1 × Pirsabak-08 96.4 0.58 8.04 2.2 0.30 0.61 3.1 0.80 1.97
B-RF1 × Janbaz 90.6 0.48 6.44 1.6 0.32 0.56 1.8 0.43 0.81
B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08 94.4 0.70 9.51 4.3 0.64 1.86 3.2 0.89 2.23
B-RF3 × Janbaz 47.4 0.30 2.88 1.7 0.36 0.65 3.1 0.82 2.02
B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08 106.9 0.76 10.96 4.8 0.87 2.66 3.5 0.89 2.33
B-RF7 × Janbaz 43.5 0.30 2.79 2.9 0.85 2.02 5.9 0.89 3.04

 

Variances among parents for single spike weight ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 (Table 4). Parental line B-RF1 had maximum variance (1.3) for single spike weight, while Pirsabak-08 had minimum variance (0.3) among parental lines. Variances for single spike weight ranged from 1.8 to 5.9 among F3 populations (Table 4). Maximum variance (5.9) was recorded for F3 population B-RF7 × Janbaz, while population B-RF1 × Janbaz had minimum variance (1.8) for single spike weight (Table 4). Heritability and selection responses for spike weight ranged from 0.43 to 0.89 and 0.81 to 3.04, respectively. F3 populations B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08, B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08 and B-RF7 × Janbaz had highest heritability (0.89) along with selection responses of 2.23, 2.33 and 3.04 g, respectively. While F3 population B-RF1 × Janbaz had lowest heritability (0.43) with the minimum selection response of 0.81 g for single spike weight. Based on mean squares broad sense heritability for single spike weight was 0.73 with selection response of 0.90 g (Table 2).

Number of grains spike-1

Mean squares for grains spike-1 were highly significant differences among genotypes (P = 0.01), F3 populations (P = 0.05), parents vs F3 populations contrast (P = 0.01). However, differences among parents were non-significant for grains spike-1 (Table 1). Grainshspike-1 ranged from 77.5 to 89.2 among parents (Table 3). Maximum number of grains (89.2 spike-1) were recorded in cultivar Janbaz, while minimum (77.5 spike-1) for parental line B-RF7. Among F3 populations, grains spike-1 ranged from 69.8 to 85.1 (Table 3). F3 population B-RF3 × Janbaz exhibited maximum grains (85.1 spike-1), while minimum grains (69.8 spike) were recorded in B-RF7 × Janbaz. Aycicek et al. (2006) evaluated 20 wheat genotypes and reported significant differences for grains spike-1. Similarly, Azam et al. (2013) also reported significant differences for grain spike-1 in wheat genotypes.

Variances for number of grains spike-1 ranged from 12.9 to 102.6 among parents (Table 5). Parental line B-IV(N)12 had maximum variance (102.6) for grains spike-1, while Pirsabak-08 had minimum variance (12.9) for number of grains spike-1. Variances among F3 populations for number of grains spike-1 ranged

Table 5: Variances, heritability (ℎ2) and expected selection response (Re) for different traits of 12 F3 populations derived from 8 wheat parents.

Genotypes

Number of grains spike-1

100-grain weight (g)

Grain yield plant-1 (g)

  Variance

2

Re

Variance

2

Re

Variance

2

Re

I. Parents
B-IV(N)11 49.5 - - 0.3 - - 31.8 - -
B-VI(N)5 35.8 - - 0.2 - - 42.3 - -
B-VI(N)12 102.6 - - 0.1 - - 32.0 - -
B-RF1 93.8 - - 0.1 - - 34.5 - -
B-RF3 36.1 - - 0.3 - - 43.4 - -
B-RF7 33.6 - - 0.1 - - 36.9 - -
Pirsabak-08 12.9 - - 0.2 - - 32.3 - -
Janbaz 22.5 - - 0.1 - - 34.2 - -

II. F3 Populations

B-IV(N)11 × Pirsabak-08 157.5 0.84 14.75 0.8 0.69 0.87 55.1 0.42 4.35
B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz 171.6 0.81 14.77 1.3 0.87 1.38 60.3 0.45 4.93
B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 290.7 0.93 22.11 1.2 0.83 1.28 74.7 0.51 6.11
B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz 381.7 0.93 25.54 1.4 0.83 1.37 114.5 0.67 10.00
B-IV(N)12 × Pirsabak-08 152.2 0.76 13.14 0.7 0.80 0.93 55.9 0.42 4.45
B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz 174.0 0.72 13.37 0.7 0.86 1.00 133.3 0.75 12.15
B-RF1 × Pirsabak-08 208.0 0.83 16.81 0.6 0.76 0.83 55.7 0.40 4.19
B-RF1 × Janbaz 149.6 0.69 11.87 1.0 0.90 1.26 92.9 0.63 8.50
B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08 165.2 0.87 15.64 0.5 0.51 0.50 68.3 0.45 5.23
B-RF3 × Janbaz 296.7 0.90 21.80 0.5 0.65 0.65 55.6 0.31 3.21
B-RF7 × Pirsabak-08 220.4 0.91 18.82 0.7 0.80 0.93 81.8 0.58 7.32
B-RF7 × Janbaz 232.0 0.88 18.80 0.5 0.80 0.79 48.3 0.26 2.57

 

from 149.6 to 381.7. F3 Population B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz had maximum variance (381.7), while population B-RF1 × Janbaz had minimum variance (149.6) (Table 5). Heritability and selection response estimates for grains spike-1 ranged from 0.69 to 0.93 and 11.87 to 25.54, respectively. F3 Populations B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08 and B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz had highest heritability (0.93 each) along with the selection responses of 22.11 and 25.54, respectively. In contrast, F3 population B-RF1 × Janbaz had lowest heritability (0.69) along with the selection response (11.87) for number of grains spike-1. Using expected mean squares broad sense heritability for grain spike-1 was 0.43 along with selection response of 3.95 (Table 2). Memon et al. (2007) reported moderate heritability (0.56) which confirms our research findings.

100-grain weight (g)

Analysis of variance for 100-grain weight showed significant differences among genotypes (P = 0.01), parents (P = 0.01) and parents vs F3 contrast (P = 0.05), while non-significant differences were observed for F3 populations (Table 10). 100-grain weight of wheat parents ranged from 3.4 to 4.6 g (Table 1). Maximum 100-grain weight (4.6 g) was observed for parental line B-IV(N)5, while B-RF7 and Pirsabak-08 both had minimum (3.4 g). 100-grain weight among F3 populations, ranged from 3.3 to 4.5 g (Table 3). F3 Population B-RF7 × Janbaz had maximum 100-grain weight (4.5 g), while minimum 100-grain weight (3.3 g) was observed for B-IV(N)11 × Pirsabak-08. Mushtaq et al. (2011) assessed two wheat genotypes (Mairaj-2008 and Fareed-2006) to evaluate the effect of drought introduced at different crop growth stages and reported significant differences among wheat genotypes. Majumder et al. (2008) evaluated twenty spring wheat varieties to find out genetic variability and genetic association among grain yield and associated traits. They reported significant variation for 100-grain weight in wheat genotypes.

Variances for 100 grain-weight ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 among wheat parents (Table 5). Maximum variance (0.3) for 100-grain weight was observed for two wheat parental lines (B-IV(N)11 and B-RF3), while minimum (0.1) variance was recorded for 4 parental lines/cultivars viz. B-IV(N)12, B-RF1, B-RF7 and Janbaz. Among F3 populations, variances for 100-grain weight ranged from 0.5 to 1.4 (Table 5). Maximum variance (1.4) for 100-grain weight was observed for F3 population B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz, while minimum variance (0.5) was recorded for B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08, B-RF3 × Janbaz and B-RF7 × Janbaz. Heritability and selection responses for 100-grain weight ranged from 0.51 to 0.90 and 0.50 to 1.38 g, respectively (Table 5). Maximum heritability (0.90) was observed for F3 population B-RF1 × Janbaz. Maximum selection response of 1.38 g was recorded for B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz. Likewise, F3 population B-RF3 × Pirsabak-08 had lowest heritability (0.51) with minimum selection response of 0.50 g for 100-grain weight. Broad sense heritability for 100-grain weight from expected mean squares was 0.43 with selection response of 0.26 g (Table 2).

Grain yield plant-1 (g)

Analysis of variance for grain yield plant-1 indicated significant differences among wheat genotypes (P = 0.01), parents (P = 0.05), and parents vs F3 populations contrast (P = 0.01). However, differences among F3 populations were non-significant for grain yield plant-1 (Table 1). Grain yield ranged from 28.6 to 32.0 g plant-1 among parents and 29.4 to 31.9 g plant-1 among F3 populations (Table 3). Parental lines B-IV(N)5 and B-RF7 had maximum grain yield (32.0 g plant-1 each), while B-RF1 had minimum grain yield (28.6 g plant-1) among parents. F3 population B-RF7 × Janbaz had maximum grain yield (31.9 g plant-1), while B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz had minimum grain yield (29.4 g plant-1). Ikramullah et al. (2011) assessed 22 F5:7 wheat genotypes along with four check cultivars as independent experiments under irrigated and rainfed environments and reported significant differences among wheat genotypes for grain yield plant-1. Similarly, Haq et al. (2008) and Cheema et al. (2006) have also reported significant differences among wheat genotypes for grain yield plant-1.

Variances of wheat parental lines/cultivars for grain yield plant-1 ranged from 31.8 to 43.4 (Table 5). Maximum variance (43.4) for grain yield was recorded for parental line B-RF3, while minimum (31.8) for wheat parent B-IV(N)11. In contrast variances among F3 populations for grain yield plant-1 ranged from 48.3 to 133.3 (Table 5). F3 population B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz had maximum variance (133.3), while B-RF7 × Janbaz had minimum variance (48.3) for grain yield plant-1. Heritability and selection responses for grain yield ranged from 0.26 to 0.75 and 2.57 to 12.15 g plant-1, respectively (Table 5). Highest heritability (0.75) for grain yield was observed for F3 population B-IV(N)12 × Janbaz along with maximum selection response of 12.15 g plant-1. In contrast, minimum heritability (0.26) for grain yield plant-1 was observed in population B-RF7 × Janbaz coupled with the selection response of 2.57 g plant-1. Using expected mean squares of ANOVA, broad sense heritability was 0.74 with selection response of 7.10 g plant-1 (Table 2).

Conclusions and Recommendations

Parental genotypes and F3 populations evaluated in present study expressed significant genetic variability for yield and yield related traits. Parents vs F3 populations contrast was significant for spike length, grains spike-1, single spike weight, 100-grain weight, and grain yield plant-1. Among F3 populations, maximum grains spike-1 were recorded for population B-RF3×Janbaz. F3 population B-RF7 × Janbaz had highest 100-grain weight and grain yield plant-1. On basis of high heritability, selection response and mean performance for yield related traits, F3 populations B-IV(N)11 × Janbaz, B-IV(N)5 × Pirsabak-08, B-IV(N)5 × Janbaz, B-RF1 × Janbaz and B-RF7 × Janbaz are recommended for evaluation in F4 and later generations to derive desirable genotypes.

Acknowledgement

I am greatly thankful to Mr. Muhammad Saeed, Ph.D. student, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, University of Agriculture, Peshawar-Pakistan for their co-operation in the quality analysis of eight parental wheat cultivars/lines and their 12 F3 populations.

Author’s Contribution

Tariq Aziz: Conducted the experiments.

Iftikhar Hussain Khalil: Supervised the research.

Quaid Hussain: Wrote the paper.

Tariq Shah: Revised the paper.

Nazir Ahmad: Data analysis.

Amir Sohail: Data collection.

References

Ahmedi, H., and B. Bajelan. 2008. Heritability of drought tolerance in wheat. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3(4): 632-635.

Aycicek, M. and Yildrim T. 2006. Heritability of yield and some yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Bangladesh J. Bot. 35(1): 17- 22.

Azam, M.S., F. Mohammad, I. Ahmad, I.H. Khalil, S.A. Jadoon and A. Nasim. 2013. Divergence in F3 segregating bread wheat populations. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 13(03): 94-99.

Baloch, M.J., E. Baloch, W.A. Jatoi and N.F. Veesar. 2013. Correlations and heritability estimates of yield and yield attributing traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Pak. J. Agric. Engg. Vet. Sci. 9 (2): 96-105.

Bilgin, O., K.Z. Korkut, İ. Başer, O. Dağlioğlu, İ. ÖZTÜRK, T. Kahraman and A. Balkan. 2011. Genetic variation and inter-relationship of some morpho-physiological traits in durum wheat (Triticum durum (L.). Pak. J. Bot. 43(1): 253-260.

Cheema, N.M., M.A. Mian, M. Ihsan, G. Rabbani and A. Mahmood. 2006. Studies on variability and some genetic parameters in spring wheat. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 43(1-2).

Donmez, E., R.G. Sears, J.P. Shroyer and G.M. Paulsen. 2001. Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Sci. 41: 1412-1419. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.4151412x

El-Shafi, M.A. 2013. Estimates of genetic variability and efficiency of selection for grain yield and its components in two wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.). Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 7(2): 83-90.

Fehr, W.R. 1993. Soybean physiology, agronomy, and utilization (Ed. A. G. Norman).120-155, Acad. Press, Inc. Ltd., London.

Haq, U.H., M.F. Malik, M. Rashid, M. Munir and Z. Akram. 2008. Evaluation and estimation of heritability and genetic advancement for yield related attributes in wheat lines. Pak. J. Bot. 40(4): 1699-1702.

Ijaz, S. and Khan, I.A. 2009. Molecular characterization of wheat germplasm using microsatellite markers. Gen. Mol. Res. 8 (3): 809-815. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol8-3gmr608

Ikramullah, I.H. Khalil, H.U. Rahman, F. Mohammad, Hidayat Ullah and S.K. Khalil. 2011. Magnitude of heritability and selection response for yield traits in wheat under two different environments. Pak. J. Bot. 43(5): 2359-2363.

Iqbal, M.Z. and S.A. Khan. 2003. Genetic variability, partial regression, co heritability studies and their implications in selection in selection of high yielding potato genotype. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 46: 123-125.

Khalil, I.F., S.A. Jadoon and G. Hassan. 2008. Effect of forage clipping on grain yield and associated traits of winter wheat in northern Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agric. 24(3): 143-150.

Khalil, H.I., M. Khalid, Farhatullah, A. Bari, M.Thair, S. Ali, Anwar and M. Ismail. 2011. Assessment of heritability estimates for some yield traits in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Pak. J. Agric. 20(3): 401-404.

Majumder, D.A.N., A.K.M. Shamsuddin, M.A. Kabir and L. Hassan. 2008. Genetic variability, correlated response and path analysis of yield and yield contributing traits of spring wheat. J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ. 6(2): 227–234.

Mahmud, I. and Kramer. 1951. Segregation of yield, height and maturity following soyabean crosses. Agron. J. 43: 605-606. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300120005x

Memon, S.M., M.U. Qureshi. B.A. Ansari and M.A. Sial. 2007. Genetic heritability for grain yield and its related character in spring wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 39(5): 1503-1509.

Mushtaq, T., S. Hussain, M.A.H.A. Bukhsh, J. Iqbal and T. Khaliq. 2011. Evaluation of two wheat genotypes performance of under drought conditions at different growth stages. Crop and Environ. 2(2): 20-27.

Siddiqui, K.A., G. Mustafa. M.A. Arain and K.A. Jafri. 1991. Realities and possibilities of improving cereal crops through mutation breeding. In: Proc. Plant Breeding to Crop Improvement, FAO/IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 173-185.

Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhary. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Dehli, India.

Shuja, M.N., Dure-nayab, M. Ali, A. Iqbal and I.H. Khalil. 2010. Evaluating the response of wheat genotypes to forage clipping. Int. J. Agric. Bio. 12(1): 111–114.

Sarhad Journal of Agriculture

September

Vol.40, Iss. 3, Pages 680-1101

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe