Morphological Characteristics of Angut Pigeons (Columba livia domestica)
Morphological Characteristics of Angut Pigeons (Columba livia domestica)
Romedi Çelik
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Harran University, 63200 Şanlıurfa, Turkey
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to determine the phenotypic characteristics of the angut pigeon breed, which is native to Şanlıurfa, where pigeon breeding has been done traditionally for a long time and is also one of the domestication centers. In this study, we adopted 146 angut pigeons comprising 72 males and 74 females. Additionally, four different colour variations were determined: yellow angut (41.1%, n = 60), red angut (35.6%, n = 52), white angut (13.7%, n = 20) and black angut (9.6%, n = 14). All the colour variants had a peak crest (upright feathers) costume structure, which was at the back of the head, starting from the end of the neck and extending from ear to ear. Among the gender groups from the measurements obtained in this study; wing length, wingspan, tail length and head width (P < 0.001); shank length and head length (P < 0.01). Differences in beak length and beak width were also significant (P < 0.05). Moreover, the differences in beak length and beak width were significant (P < 0.05). Today, although anguts are morphologically similar to the Demkeş breed in Turkey, they do not have trumpeting sound ability. The trumpeter breeds of fancy pigeons are so named because of their unique vocalizations, which sound vaguely like low laughter. The data obtained on the morphological features of angut pigeons support the hypothesis that angut pigeons are a form pigeon and should be defined as a different breed.
Article Information
Received 08 July 2022
Revised 19 August 2022
Accepted 03 September 2022
Available online 30 November 2022
(early access)
Published 30 October 2023
Key words
Biodiversity, Gene sources, Morphological characteristics, Pigeon
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20220708190754
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
030-9923/2023/0006-2911 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2023 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Pigeons are considered symbols of peace and are worshipped as fertility goddesses. From their domestication since the dawn of humanity, they have been used as key communicators in warfare by every major historical superpower, from ancient Egypt to the Americas, and are believed to have saved thousands of lives. Charles Darwin relied heavily on pigeons to prove his theory of evolution (Blechman, 2022).
Pigeons are one of the most intelligent birds in the world. They are one of only six species and the only one non-mammal to pass the mirror test of being able to recognize their own reflection. Studies by the Keio University team has demonstrated that pigeons were able to differentiate between the paintings which is painting by Picasso and those of Monet (Allen, 2009).
The rock pigeon is the world’s oldest domesticated bird. Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets and Egyptian hieroglyphics mention the domestication of pigeons more than 5,000 years ago (Biray, 2019). Meanwhile, research suggests that the domestication of pigeons occurred as early as 10,000 years ago (Blasco et al., 2014; Domestic pigeon, 2021; Yılmaz et al., 2013).
All fancy pigeons descend from a common ancestor, the rock pigeon (Columba livia). They are incredibly diverse in shape and size due to genetic mutations. These mutations led to long legs, unusual beaks, large crests and bizarre flight displays (Allen, 2009). A typical pigeon has a compact body, short legs, small head and small beak. The bill usually has a horny distal part and a tumid basal part covered with soft skin and cere. Depending on the species, a ring of bare skin of various colours may protect the eye (Baptista et al., 2009).
Pigeons, one of the animals that are a local gene source and a biodiversity element are frequently investigated in terms of genetic and various morphological characteristics, both to shed light on phylogenetic studies and to lead to the development of more efficient production systems and genetic improvement studies (Casanova, 2013). Since pigeons have been subjected to artificial selection throughout history, many breeds spread around the world have emerged with different morphological and behavioural characteristics from their ancestors (Bartels, 2003; Cobo-Simón et al., 2020; Murton et al., 1972; Stringham et al., 2012).
In general, the first step to study the genetic diversity is to determine the current situation and to determine the level of species, breed, and population. It is possible to achieve this by measuring and defining the morphological and other biological characteristics of the related species and breed (Soysal et al., 2011). As a matter of fact, breed registration is realized by submitting an application file to be prepared within the framework of the relevant legislation (Breed Registration Regulation) to the relevant board (Domestic Animal Registration Committee) and publishing the board’s approval in the official newspaper. In the registration application file in question, the breed should be characterized (identified) in terms of phenotypic (morphometric) and genetic aspects (Resmi-Gazete, 2022).
Angut pigeons have a mystical value among the people and have been the subject of many religious narratives. In other words, angut pigeons, whose roots date back to ancient times, have been bred for many years in Anatolia, especially in Şanlıurfa. You can undoubtedly see breeders all over Anatolia just like in Şanlıurfa, whose only concern is not fame or a little wealth, and who have special feelings and passions hidden in the joy in their demeanor and facial expressions while describing their relationship with pigeons. However, no reports have been published on this particular breed of pigeons. Therefore, this study is the first investigation into the morphological characteristics of the angut pigeon genotype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pigeon
This research was conducted on 146 angut pigeons bred in Şanlıurfa, which comprised 72 males and 74 females from different age groups. The pigeons were classified according to their age as 06–12 months (Group 1), 13–24 months (Group 2), 25–36 months (Group 3) and >36 months (Group 4).
Phenotype characteristics
The morphological features of angut pigeons, such as head type, eye colour, feather colour (body colour), number of wing and tail feathers, wing and tail traces and existence of long trotters, were defined according to the common statements of the breeders. The wing feathers and the primary axial and secondary feathers were counted (Atasoy et al., 2013; Balcı et al., 2018), (Table I).
To determine the head structure, eye color, beak type, beak tip color and nail color characteristics of angut pigeons, special boxes with a diameter of 60×50 cm which were illuminated with led lamps from the right, left and top were used. In addition, the boxes were covered with a 500×300 cm black cloth to avoid external stimuli to the pigeons. Then the pigeons were photographed with the Canon EOS 650D camera.
The body length, wingspan, wing length, body length, tail length, and chest circumference were measured using a measuring tape, while chest width, head length and width, beak length and depth, and body diameter were measured using digital calipers (Atasoy et al., 2013; Çelik, 2021; Özbaşer et al., 2016).
Table I. Number of wing and tail feathers in angut pigeon.
Morphological characteristics |
N |
Ratio (%) |
Number of wing feather |
||
10-1-10 |
82 |
56.2 |
10-1-11 |
37 |
25.3 |
10-1-9 |
27 |
18.5 |
Number of tail feather |
||
12 feathers |
130 |
89.0 |
13 feathers |
13 |
8.9 |
14 feathers |
3 |
2.1 |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 22.0, in which the differences between the groups and genders were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and independent-sample t-test methods, respectively (Özdamar, 2001; Soysal, 2000). The conformity of the data to the normal distribution was examined using the homogeneity of variance test. The “Descriptors” method was followed, and factors with significant effects were compared using the Duncan test (Duncan, 1955).
RESULTS
Based on the breeder’s statements and our observations, angut pigeons are a form pigeon. The main characteristic of these pigeons is that their colour and physical features are as desired. Compared to other pigeon breeds, angut pigeons have a medium-sized body structure (Fig. 1).
In this study, considering the evaluations of the breeders and our measurements and observations, four different colour variations were determined: Yellow angut (41.1%, n = 60), red angut (35.6%, n = 52), white angut (13.7%, n = 20) and black angut (9.6%, n = 14) (Fig. 1).
Angut pigeons have a medium size and a thin and elegant beak. Depending on the colour of the bird, the beak, nail and eye colours may change. All the colour variants have a peak crest (upright feathers) costume structure, which is at the back of the head, starting from the end of the neck and extending from ear to ear (Fig. 2).
According to the statistical analysis results, significant differences were found between the groups (P<0.05) for the beak length of angut pigeons in terms of age groups. In terms of beak depth, chest circumference and wing length, these differences were significant (P<0.01). When the differences between the groups at the level of (P<0.001) were examined, it was understood that there were differences between the mean values of body weight, body length, shank length and chest width.
Among the gender groups from the measurements obtained in this study; wing length, wingspan, tail length and head width (P < 0.001); shank length and head length (P < 0.01). Differences in beak length and beak width were also significant (P < 0.05) Moreover, the differences in beak length and beak width were significant (P < 0.05), (Table II).
DISCUSSION
Today, anguts do not have trumpeting sound ability, although they are morphologically similar to the breed known as Demkeş in Turkey. The trumpeter breeds of fancy pigeons are so named because of their unique vocalizations, which sound vaguely like low laughter.Levi described this trumpeting vocalization in his book “The Pigeon”. Several domesticated varieties possess this trumpeting ability to various degrees (Trumpeter (pigeon), 2002). Demkeş (Güvercin bilgi kaynağı, 2022) are very similar to the breed known as Bokhara trumpeter. Apart from the Bokhara trumpeter breed, there are several trumpeter breeds in Europe, especially English trumpeter, and double-crested trumpeter breeds (Trumpeter-Pigeon, 2022). However, the most striking feature that distinguishes anguts from Bokhara trumpeter pigeons is that the ciga (bangs), called the front crown, does not have a fully round shape, just as in Demkeş, and is not long enough to cover their eyes and beak. However, the front crown of the Bokhara trumpeter pigeons is round and quite long, such that their eyes and beaks are not obvious. In addition, the rear hill is more ostentatious in the Bokhara trumpeter pigeons. Overall, angut pigeons have a characteristic body shape that distinguishes them from trumpeters.
Head crest, which can be of different structures in several wild and domestic bird species, has an important function in bird mate selection and is also preferred by breeders. By analysing the genomes of several pigeon breeds were discovered a mutation in the highly conserved intracellular kinase domain of EphB2, which was encoded by a single gene that was perfectly associated with inverted feather crests on the head (Price, 2002; Domyan and Shapiro, 2016). In angut pigeons, the rear hill (kepez) completely covers the neck, but it is not as majestic as in the Bokhara trumpeters (Fig. 2).
Anguts have a medium size, thin and elegant beak. Depending on the color of the bird, beak, nail and eye colors may change (Fig. 2). The wings are carried on the tail and never cross the tail. Also, they do not have as long a tail as Demkeş. They have a thick and short neck structure. The chest is slightly curved forward, round and broad.
In domestic pigeons, the epidermis of the ankle and foot may be completely scaly or covered with hair. Darwin’s (1868) observations of the densely feathered pigeon’s feet (trotters) postulate the anatomical structure of the transition from scaly to hairy epidermis, and his observations of the English trumpeter’s feet assume a very
Table II. The statistical values of the morphometric characteristics detected from angut pigeons (X±Sx).
Angut |
Group 1 (n=35) |
Group 2 (n=47) |
Group 3 (n=30) |
Group 4 (n=34) |
Total (n=146) |
Age |
Female (n=74) |
Male (n=72) |
Sex |
Body weight (g) |
349.14± 3.45a |
358.62± 3.22b |
369.67± 2.85c |
370.88± 2.91c |
361.47± 1.74 |
*** |
358.58± 2.59 |
364.44± 2.27 |
- |
Beak length (mm) |
18.44± 0.11a |
18.73± 0.11ab |
18.86± 0.10b |
18.88± 0.08b |
18.72± 0.05 |
* |
18.62± 0.08 |
18.83± 0.07 |
* |
Beak depth (mm) |
8.31± 0.08a |
8.59± 0.08b |
8.68± 0.07b |
8.74± 0.09b |
8.58± 0.04 |
** |
8.47± 0.06 |
8.69± 0.06 |
* |
Head length (mm) |
34.20 ±0.11 |
34.30± 0.09 |
34.36± 0.08 |
34.40± 0.09 |
34.31± 0.05 |
- |
34.17± 0.06 |
34.46± 0.07 |
** |
Head width (mm) |
22.86± 0.11 |
23.02± 0.07 |
23.04± 0.09 |
23.13± 0.08 |
23.01± 0.04 |
- |
22.85± 0.05 |
23.17± 0.06 |
*** |
Shank length (mm) |
36.57± 0.21a |
37.49± 0.16b |
37.64± 0.20b |
37.81± 0.25b |
37.37± 0.11 |
*** |
37.02± 0.15 |
37.73± 0.14 |
** |
Wing length (cm) |
28.74± 0.21a |
29.19± 0.18ab |
29.78± 0.22b |
29.43± 0.20b |
29.26± 0.10 |
** |
28.74± 0.15 |
29.79± 0.12 |
*** |
Wingspan (cm) |
68.07± 0.40 |
67.81± 0.29 |
68.48± 0.30 |
68.43± 0.32 |
68.15± 0.17 |
- |
67.31± 0.23 |
69.02± 0.19 |
*** |
Tail length (cm) |
13.17± 0.14 |
13.16± 0.12 |
13.40± 0.14 |
13.53± 0.17 |
13.30± 0.07 |
- |
13.05± 0.09 |
13.55± 0.10 |
*** |
Body length (cm) |
32.89± 0.31a |
33.43± 0.22a |
34.80± 0.27b |
34.96± 0.25b |
33.93± 0.15 |
*** |
33.66± 0.21 |
34.22± 0.21 |
- |
Chest perimeter (cm) |
20.52± 0.06a |
20.66± 0.05ab |
20.70± 0.05b |
20.79± 0.04b |
20.67± 0.03 |
** |
20.65± 0.04 |
20.68± 0.04 |
- |
Chest width (cm) |
5.50± 0.03a |
5.60± 0.02b |
5.61± 0.02b |
5.61± 0.02b |
5.58± 0.01 |
*** |
5.58± 0.02 |
5.58± 0.02 |
- |
-, P>0.05; *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; a-c, means within a column with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05).
densely feathered structure such that they look almost like small wings. Although the feet of angut pigeons are similar to those of trumpeters, they are slightly shorter than normal and have a unique form and stance (Fig. 3). All angut pigeons have long backward curved legs, which are called reed trotters (Figs. 1 and 3).
In pigeons, the genetic basis of pigmentation for aesthetic or practical reasons has been one of the most intensively researched areas. Pigeons display an enormous amount of colour variation. In addition to being a phenotype that appeals to the visual and aesthetic sense of the breeders, colour variations are also associated with differences in sexual preference, survival and predator avoidance for natural pigeon populations (Darwin, 1868). Demkeş and other trumpeter pigeons have a great variety of colours (Trumpeter pigeon, 2022; Güvercin bilgi kaynağı, 2022). In addition to solid colours, such as white, black, red, blue, yellow and red brown, there are several varieties of mixed colours (variegated), ranging from white to black. However, anguts only consist of solid colour varieties, such as white, black, red and yellow. Furthermore, their short body hair forms a flat surface, and their feathers are not coarse, tangled and messy (Figs. 1 and 4).
As 361.47 g the average body weight of angut pigeons was determined to be lighter than squadron flyer pigeons 428.85 g (Özbaşer et al., 2016) and then cakal pigeons 374.02 g (Özbaşer et al., 2020). They are heavier than Şanlıurfa Yapışan pigeons 317.38 g (Çelik, 2022), than Alabadem pigeons 321.17g (Erdem et al., 2021), than Tumbler pigeons in province of Ankara 321.62 g (Atasoy et al., 2013), than Mülekat pigeons 328.96 g (Özbaşer et al., 2020) and Trakya Makaracısı pigeons 335.58 g (Soysal et al., 2011). In many breeds, (Yıldırım et al., 2018; Atasoy et al., 2013; Özbaşer et al., 2020) there was a difference in body weight values (higher in males than females) in gender groups, but no difference was found in sex groups of anguts pigeons.
Head length and width were found to be significantly higher in males than females, and head length was found in Atasoy et al. (2013) were similar to their findings for Tumbler pigeons. Similarly, the fact that it is important in terms of wing length and wingspan (higher in males) and the difference between the sexes in terms of chest depth is insignificant Atasoy et al. (2013) and Balcı et al. (2018) were similar to their findings for tumbler pigeons and Bursa Oynarı pigeons, respectively.
Compared to their wild ancestors, domestic pigeons show considerable differences in morphological structure, especially the structure, colour, length and distribution of the feathers, as well as the anatomical structure of the head, beak and claws, which significantly affect their appearance (Parés-Casanova and Kabir, 2019; Özbaşer et al., 2021; Shapiro et al., 2013). This is because pigeons have been subjected to intense selective breeding throughout history, resulting in the emergence of many varieties around the world (Murton et al., 1972; Johnston, 1990). The mature rock pigeon, which is considered the ancestor of domestic pigeons, is 29–37 cm in length, with a wingspan of 62–72 cm. According to standard measurements, the wing, tail, beak and shank lengths are generally 22.3, 9.5–11, 1.8 and 2.6–3.5 cm, respectively (Rock dove, 2022). When these values are compared to similar values for angut pigeons, it can be said that they still retain characteristics similar to those of their wild ancestors (Table II).
Şanlıurfa has an important place in pigeon breeding as it is a region where traditional pigeon breeding has been done for a long time and it is one of the pigeon domestication centers. The source of most of the pigeon breeds in Turkey is Şanlıurfa pigeons (Kürkçüoğlu, 2011; Özbaşer et al., 2016). In this respect, this study was carried out within the scope of the preliminary studies required for the registration of the angut pigeon breed as a local gene source. After morphological measurements, genetic association and characterization studies will be supportive for breed identification.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thank the valuable pigeon-loving breeders who not only opened their doors to us during the process of obtaining their data, but also put their pigeons, which they value very much and protect meticulously, at the service of the study.
Ethical statement
This research was approved by the Harran University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Approval no: 2021.005.04).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
Financial support
This research was supported by Harran University Project Office with project no: 241 21190.
Statement of conflict of interest
The author has declared no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Allen, B., 2009. Pigeon. Reaktion Books.
Blechman, A.D., 2022. Partners Available at: http://andrewblechman.com/pigeons/index.html, (accessed 18 May 2022).
Atasoy, F., Erdem, E., and Hacan, Ö.G., 2013. Determination of morphological characteristics of tumbler pigeons in province of Ankara (Columba livia domestica). Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 60: 135-143.
Balcı, F., Ardıçlı, S., Alpay, F., Dinçel, D., Soyudal, B., and Mehlika, E.R., 2018. The determination of some morphological characteristics of Bursa Oynarı pigeon breed. Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 65: 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002867
Baptista, L. F., Martınez Gomez, J. E., and Horblit, H. M., 2009. Darwin’s pigeons and the evolution of the columbiforms: Recapitulation of ancient genes. Acta zool. Mexic., 25: 719-741. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2009.253674
Bartels, T., 2003. Variations in the morphology, distribution, and arrangement of feathers in domesticated birds. J. exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol., 298: 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.28
Biray, B., 2019. Mitochondrial DNA analyses of domestic pigeon breeds (Columba livia domestica) in Turkey. Master of Science (Biology). Middle East Technical University.
Blasco, R., Finlayson, C., Rosell, J., Marco, A.S., Finlayson, S., Finlayson, G., and Vidal, J.R., 2014. The earliest pigeon fanciers. Sci. Rep., 4: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05971
Casanova, P.M.P.I., 2013. Morphological similarities between Spanish pigeon breeds. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 37: 346-351. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1111-22
Çelik, R., 2022. Morphological Characteristics of Şanlıurfa Yapışan (Tumbler) Pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Harran Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 11: 106-112. https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.1109349
Çelik, R., 2021. Diyarbakır’a özgü güvercin ırkları. Medipres Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti., Malatya.
Cobo-Simón, I., Márquez-Rodríguez, J., Méndez-Cea, B., Gallego, F.J., and Pérez-Fernández, M., 2020. Understanding the morphological and genetic distinctiveness of the Spanish pouter pigeons: The Marchenero Pouter as a case study. Ibis, 162: 766-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12797
Darwin, C.R., 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication, Asa. Gray, New York.
Domestic Pigeon, 2021. Partners available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_pigeon, (accessed 13 April 2021).
Domyan, E.T., and Shapiro, M.D., 2017. Pigeonetics takes flight: evolution, development, and genetics of intraspecific variation. Develop. Biol., 427: 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.11.008
Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
Erdem, E., Özbaşer, F.T., Gürcan, E.K., and Soysal, M.I., 2021. The morphological and morphometric characteristics of Alabadem pigeons. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 45: 372-379.
Güvercin Bilgi Kaynağı, 2022. Partners Available at: https://www.guvercin.info/irklar_demkes.php, (accessed: 13 Mar 2022).
Johnston, R.F., 1990. Variation in size and shape in pigeons, Columba livia. Wilson Bull, 102: 213-225.
Kürkçüoğlu, S.S., 2011. Şanlıurfa Geleneksel Mimarisinde Kuş Takaları (Kuş Evleri). Şanlıurfa Kültür Sanat Tarih ve Turizm Dergisi, 11: 41-43.
Murton, R.K., Thearle, R.J.P., and Thompson, J., 1972. Ecological studies of the Feral pigeon, Columba livia var. 1. Population, breeding biology and methods of control. J. appl. Ecol., 9: 835-874. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401909
Özbaşer, F.T., Atasoy, F., Erdem, E., and Güngör, İ., 2016. Some morphological characteristics of squadron flyer pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 63: 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002726
Özbaser, F.T., Erdem, E., Gurcan, E.K., and Soysal, M.I., 2020. Morphological characteristics of the cakal, Mulakat and oriental pigeon breeds raised in the Marmara Region of Turkey. Agric. Sci. Digest-A Res. J., 40: 303-310. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-213
Özbaşer, F.T., Erdem, E., Gürcan, E.K., and Soysal, M.İ., 2021. The morphological characteristics of the Muradiye Dönek pigeon, a native Turkish genetic resource. Vet. J. Ankara Univ., 68: 107-112. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.690680
Özdamar, K., 2001. SPSS İle Biyoistatistik. Kaan Kitapevi, 4. Baskı, Eskişehir.
Pares-Casanova, P.M., and Kabir, A., 2019. Morphological diversification among pigeon breeds of different aptitudes. WSEAS Trans. Biol. Biomed., 16: 1-9.
Price, T.D., 2002. Domesticated birds as a model for the genetics of speciation by sexual selection. Genetics of mate choice: From sexual selection to sexual isolation. Genetica, 116: 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0265-3_14
Resmi-Gazete, 2022. Partners Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/12/20111222-7.htm (accessed: 08 Aug 2022).
Rock-Dove, 2022. Partners Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Dove/, (accessed 15 May 2022)
Shapiro, M.D., Kronenberg, Z., Li, C., Domyan, E.T., Pan, H., Campbel, L.M., and Wang, J., 2013. Genomic diversity and evolution of the head crest in the rock pigeon. Science, 339: 1063-1067. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230422
Soysal, M.İ., 2000. Biyometrinin Prensipleri (İstatistik I ve II ders notları). Trakya Üniversitesi Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi, Tekirdağ.
Soysal, M.İ., Gürcan, E.K., Akar, T., Alter, K., and Genç, S., 2011. The determination of several morphological features of Thrace Roller Breeds in raised Thrace Region. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8: 61-68.
Stringham, S.A., Mulroy, E.E., Xing, J., Record, D., Guernsey, M.W., Aldenhoven, J.T., and Shapiro, M.D., 2012. Divergence, convergence, and the ancestry of feral populations in the domestic rock pigeon. Curr. Biol., 22: 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.045
Trumpeter (pigeon), 2022. Partners Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trumpeter_(pigeon), (accessed 14 May 2022).
Yıldırım, H., Doğan, U., and Cimrin, T., 2018. Determination of the morphological characteristics of Scandaroon pigeon grown in the central of Hatay province (Columba livia domestica). Eurasia Proc. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math., 2: 368-375.
Yilmaz, O., Savas, T., Ertugrul, M., and Wilson, R.T., 2013. The domestic livestock resources of Turkey: Inventory of pigeon groups and breeds with notes on breeder organizations. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 69: 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000299
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?