Effect of Phosphine on Esterases of Larvae and Adult Beetles of Phosphine-Exposed Populations of Stored Grain Pest, Trogoderma granarium Collected from Different Godowns of Punjab

Tanzeela Riaz1, Farah Rauf Shakoori2* and Syed Shahid Ali3

1Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

2Department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

3Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

ABSTRACT

The present study was aimed at determining the possible role of esterases in development of tolerance/resistance in phosphine-tolerant populations. The level of total esterases, carboxyl esterases, choline esterases, acetylcholine esterases and aryl esterases were determined in 4th & 6th instar larvae and adult beetles of phosphine-tolerant populations (previously exposed to phosphine for 15 years) of wheat grain pest, Trogoderma granarium collected from various storage facilities of Punjab, Pakistan viz., Mandi Bahauddin-I, Mandi Bahauddin-II, Gujrat, Gujranwala and Sargodha. The activities of all esterases tested were significantly increased in all field collected phosphine-tolerant populations when compared with phosphine-susceptible population. Among developmental stages, the 4th instar larvae possessed higher esterase activities than 6th instar larvae and adult beetles in all populations of T. granarium. The increased level of esterases in phosphine tolerant populations as compared to susceptible population has pointed some correlation between esterase activities and phosphine tolerance.

Article Information

Received 19 November 2016

Revised 20 December 2016

Accepted 29 December 2016

Available online 26 April 2017

Authors’ Contributions

SSA, FRS and TR designed the research project, analysed the data and wrote the article. TR conducted the experimental work. FRS supervised the work.

Key words

Trogoderma granarium, Phosphine, Esterases, Insecticide tolerance, Fumigation.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.3.819.824

* Corresponding author: farah.shakoori@yahoo.com

0030-9923/2017/0003-0819 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2017 Zoological Society of Pakistan

Introduction

 

Khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium is one of the most notorious pests of stored grains in many tropical and subtropical regions of the world (Ahmedani et al., 2011). To overcome the problem of pest development, control measures of different nature are being adapted at farm, market and public sector storages (Haq et al., 2005), that consist of the use of native or natural method of control by plant material (Prakash and Rao, 2006; Kestenholz et al., 2007; Neoliya et al., 2007; Gandhi et al., 2010) and also by use of contact insecticides and fumigants. Insecticides and fumigants are used to restrict insect damage. Due to impaired ability of pesticides to control these stored grain pests, the fumigation technique with methyl bromide and phosphine as fumigant is being widely used in godowns (Walter, 2006). Fumigation plays a major role in insect pest elimination in stored products. The use of phosphine is preferred now a-days due to its minimum residual effects (Atkinson et al., 2004; Walter, 2006; Wang et al., 2006; Pimentel et al., 2007).

Indiscriminate and unplanned use of pesticides and fumigants has resulted in wide spread resistance in pests against these chemical (Zettler and Arthur, 2000; Bughio and Wilkins, 2004; Assie et al., 2007; Daglish, 2008). The development of resistance has become a global issue and control of insect pest is becoming difficult due to this phenomenon (Collins et al., 2005; Pimentel et al., 2009).

The increased tolerance and development of resistance against sub lethal doses of insecticides may be due to increased levels of several insecticide degrading enzymes and other metabolites. The up-regulation is usually attributed to a genetic change in the insecticides degrading enzymes. Insecticide/fumigant exposure has been reported to induce esterase activity in insects and these esterase activities have been found very high in resistant species, which are responsible for hydrolysing or inactivation of various ester linkages of insecticides. They are able to cleave esters, tri-ester phosphates, halides, amides and thio-esters. No efforts have been made to study the level of resistance in T. granarium against phosphine in Pakistan for effective management of the problem. Although in literature, the mode of action of phosphine has been mentioned as uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation in electron transport chain but this study was specifically planned to evaluate the direct/indirect effect of phosphine on various esterase levels to correlate its activities with development of tolerance in T. granarium.

 

Materials and methods

Rearing and maintenance of insect culture

Six populations of stored grain pest, Trogoderma granarium (Everts) with common name khapra beetle were used in this study. Master cultures of five populations of khapra beetle tolerant to phosphine (previously exposed to phosphine for 15 years) were collected from different godowns viz., Mandi Bahauddin-I (MBDIN-I), Mandi Bahauddin-II (MBDIN-II), Gujrat, Gujranwala and Sargodha of Punjab province. These godowns have more than 15 years history of phosphine fumigation to wheat. The wheat samples containing T. granarium (Everts) were collected in sterilized plastic bags and brought to laboratory for study. A phosphine-susceptible (population never exposed to phosphine previously) were taken from 10 years old culture maintained in the culture room of department of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore. The master cultures of T. granarium (six populations) were maintained in temperature and humidity controlled room at 30±1°C and 65±5% RH. A pure homogeneous stock of each population was developed in the culture room according to Riaz et al. (2014) and Shakoori et al. (2016). From homogeneous stock of each population 4th, 6th instar larvae and adult beetles were used for further experiments.

Generation and administration of phosphine

To evaluate the LC50 value of phosphine for 4th and 6th instar larvae and adult beetles (24 h old), gaseous phosphine was generated from aluminium phosphide in the laboratory and different doses were calculated according to the technique given in FAO plant protection bulletin (1975). Commercially available aluminium phosphide (AlP) pellets containing (approximately 0.2g) are recommended as the most suitable source of phosphine. The LC50 value of each population was recorded according to procedure given by Riaz et al. (2016).

Biochemical analysis for esterase activities

Biochemical analysis of various esterase activities including total esterases (TE), carboxylesterase (CE), cholniesterase (ChE), acetylcholineesterase (AChE) and aryleesterase (AE) were performed. Absorbance of some enzyme activities like TE, CE and ChE were converted into activity/quantity from their standard curve.

Twenty adults and twenty larvae of 4th and 6th instar larvae of khapra beetle from each population were taken in three replicates. They were weighed and homogenized in their respective extraction buffer with the help of motor driven Teflon glass homogenizer with constant cooling in crushed ice. Total esterase and carboxyl esterase activities were estimated according to Devonshire (1975b). Acetylcholine esterase activity was estimated according to Devonshire (1975a). Cholinesterase activity was determined according to Rappaport et al. (1959). Estimation of aryle esterase activity was done according to Junge and Klees (1981).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by tukey’s Post Hoc test was applied to all the data of biochemical parameters to compare pair wise means of various populations to determine the significant difference at P<0.05 using SPSS software.

 

Results

 

Various esterases (TE, CE, ChE, AChE and AE) activity in three different developmental stages (4th and 6th instar larvae and adult beetles) of phosphine-susceptible population and five phosphine-tolerant populations (Gujranwala, MBDIN-I, Gujrat, MBDIN-II and Sargodha) of T. granarium are shown in Table I. Percent increase in TE, CE, ChE, AChE and AE activity of tolerant populations in comparison with susceptible is shown in Figure 1. In phosphine-tolerant populations, TE, CE, ChE, AChE and AE activity was raised significantly when compared with phosphine-susceptible population at P<0.05. Among tolerant populations, TE, CE and AE activity was significantly different from each other while ChE and AChE activity was not significantly different in various populations at P<0.05. In 4th instar larvae, the ChE activity was not significantly different in (Sargodha and MBDIN-I population) and (MBDIN-II and Gujrat population), likewise in 6th instar larvae the ChE activity in Gujrat population was not significantly different from MBDIN-II and Sargodha populations at P<0.05. In adult beetles MBDIN-I was not significantly different from Gujrat and Sargodha populations in ChE activity at P<0.05. In 4th instar larvae the AChE activity was not significantly different in Sargodha and MBDIN-I populations, likewise in 6th instar larvae, AChE activity was not significantly different in Sargodha and Gujranwal populations at P<0.05. In adult beetles non-significant difference was observed in AChE activity of (MBDIN-II and Gujrat populations) and (Sargodha, Gujrat and Gujranwala populations) at P<0.05. In phosphine-tolerant populations, AE activity was raised significantly when compared with susceptible population at P<0.05. The AE activity was not significantly different in adult beetles of MBDIN-II and MBDIN-I population at P<0.05.

 

Table I.- Activities of various esterases (IU/mg body weight) of 4th instar larvae, 6th instar larvae and adult beetles of susceptible and five tolerant populations of T. granarium.

Populations	TE	CE	ChE	AChE	AE
4th instar larvae
Susceptible	*116.86 ± 0.149a	*23.31 ± 0.201a	*24.31 ± 0.658abc	*36.32 ± 0.701ab	*52.71 ± 0.277a
MBDIN-I	133.87 ± 0.249a	45.49 ± 0.244a	30.98 ± 0.829ac	53.94 ± 0.702a	98.78 ± 0.415a
MBDIN-II	131.34 ± 0.503a	42.95 ± 0.127a	49.24 ± 0.742ab	59.26 ± 0.671ab	102.37 ± 0.694a
Gujrat	136.34 ± 0.213a	39.41 ± 0.129a	46.67 ± 0.758ab	66.32 ± 0.706ab	90.83 ± 0.658a
Gujranwala	138.98 ± 0.329a	37.54 ± 0.216a	53.1 ± 0.695abc	71.68 ± 0.721ab	114.98 ± 0.741a
Sargodha	122.66 ± 0.229a	29.72 ± 0.205a	31.45 ± 1.256ac	56.28 ± 0.538a	61.79 ± 0.669a
6th instar larvae
Susceptible	108.36 ± 0.224a	23.43 ± 0.245a	21.95 ± 0.843abc	35.11 ± 0.70ab	49.21 ± 0.322a
MBDIN-I	130.81 ± 0.205a	42.43 ± 0.222a	26.97 ± 0.727abc	50.92 ± 0.871ab	95.63 ± 0.688a
MBDIN-II	129.33 ± 0.110a	37.29 ± 0.311a	46.32 ± 0.979ac	56.43 ± 0.666ab	100.12 ± 0.671a
Gujrat	132.48 ± 0.219a	45.42 ± 0.163a	47.19 ± 0.657a	61.05 ± 0.876ab	104.01 ± 0.642a
Gujranwala	137.62 ± 0.117a	48.21 ± 0.159a	50.45 ± 0.948ab	69.11 ± 0.717a	112.81 ± 0.768a
Sargodha	126.31 ± 0.119a	33.98 ± 0.191a	36.15 ± 0.663abc	68.11 ± 0.498a	90.49 ± 0.628a
Adult beetles
Susceptible	87.14 ± 0.879a	19.89 ± 0.161a	17.56 ± 0.756ade	33.27 ± 0.721ade	47.38 ± 0.255cd
MBDIN-I	125.31 ± 0.160a	41.84 ± 0.356a	22.76 ± 0.591ae	47.48 ± 0.81ade	93.95 ± 0.743c
MBDIN-II	122.56 ± 0.354a	35.83 ± 0.126a	33.98 ± 0.603ade	54.19 ± 0.683ae	96.06 ± 0.732c
Gujrat	126.62 ± 0.266a	44.69 ± 0.193a	39.21 ± 0.786ad	57.41 ± 0.598a	101.14 ± 0.650cd
Gujranwala	129.67 ± 0.196a	45.94 ± 0.164a	41.10 ± 0.482ad	63.18 ± 0.801ade	106.90 ±0.731cd
Sargodha	119.93 ± 0.171a	30.09 ± 0.137a	21.87 ± 0.658ae	60.05 ± 0.655ad	86.39 ± 0.714cd

TE, total esterases; CE, carboxyl esterase; ChE, cholin esterase; AChE, acetylcholin esterase; AE, aryle esterase.

 

Discussion

 

Khapra beetle, T. granarium is a serious pest of grains and stored products all over the world especially in tropics and subtropics including Pakistan. In current investigation, populations of Khapra beetle were collected from godowns where insects are consecutively exposed to sub-lethal doses of phosphine because storage facilities are insufficiently gas tight. So, as a result of repeated exposure to low doses of phosphine, these insects develop tolerance against phosphine. It was investigated that continuous exposure of phosphine to T. granarium in the stored grain facilities resulted in elevated level of TE, CE, ChE, AChE and AE activities in all phosphine-tolerant populations. Sher et al. (2004) reported that in 4th instar larvae of T. granarium, the activity of TE was increased in Haroonabad (107HR) population after 10 h exposure of phosphine concentration. CE are enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of carboxyl esters with addition of water and they belong to α/β- hydrolase family (Junge et al., 1975; Ollis et al., 1992; Cygler et al., 1993; Oakeshott et al., 1999; Satoh and Hosokawa, 2006; Hosokawa et al., 2007). The development of resistance to agrochemicals, pesticides and fumigants involves high level of CE reported by Newcomb et al. (1997), Byrne et al. (2000), Oakeshott et al. (2005) and Cui et al. (2007). Tang et al. (1988) reported 23 resistant species of pests in China and it was evaluated that resistance was caused by increased level of CE activity which play major role in development of resistance than MFOs.

ChE and AChE are enzymes that belong to a/b family of hydrolyzing enzymes to terminate nerve impulses by breaking the neurotransmitter at cholinergic synapses (Ollis et al., 1992). Sher et al. (2004) reported that in 4th instar larvae of T. granarium the activity of ChE was increased as a result of exposure to phosphine. In literature, there is couple of studies who have reported the inhibition of AChE activity after exposure to phosphine. Sher et al. (2004) reported the inhibition of AChE activity in 4th instar larvae of T. granarium after exposure to phosphine. These all reports on inhibition of AChE activity were documented in various test organisms after a single exposure to phosphine but in godown as discussed earlier beetles are exposed to under dosage of phosphine. So, with increased AChE activity, the normal breakdown process of acetylcholine into choline will occur normally at the time of need and different systems of insect may co-ordinate efficiently, providing it protection and tolerance against fumigant.

 

The involvement of AChE in insecticide resistance is primarily related to the presence of altered AChE binding site in resistant insects which makes the enzyme insensitive to inhibition by the insecticides. Modified AChE (MACE), with alterations in the primary structure of the enzyme, results in a reduced sensitivity of AChE to OPs and carbamates and provides to the insect some levels of resistance (Fournier and Mutero, 1994). Charpentier and Founeir (2001) reported that the amount of AChE is positively correlated with resistance to OP insecticides. Alon et al. (2008) and Cao et al. (2008) reported that increased expression of esterases results from increased transcription levels, due to upregulation of the corresponding gene.

Zhu and He (2000) reported that elevated level of AE in Schizaphis graminum and Sher et al. (2004) in T. granarium reported that AE was responsible for development of resistance against organophosphates/fumigants.

Although, the known literature does not indicate any increase in esterase activity with exposure to phosphine as it is well known that phosphine is a gas without any ester bond so, it is assumed that rise in esterase level is not possible with this toxicant. But during this study, the experiments were formed five times to make assure the change in enzyme activity and every time an increase in esterase activity has been observed. This increased esterase level is indicator of some indirect effects of phosphine on esterase activities. In literature several studies have shown that phosphine undergo metabolism in living system with the formation of organophosphine compounds, phosphates, hypophosphite and phosphite derivatives by replacing hydrogen atom (R3P) with other organic molecules like alcoholic group of proteins, amino acids and sugars with the formation of esters. In living system there is possibility that rise in these organic phosphate esters might be responsible for rise in various esterase activities.

 

Acknowledgement

 

TR is highly grateful to Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for funding the study under its “Indigenous 5000 PhD Fellowship” program. This article is part of PhD thesis of TR.

 

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

Ahmedani, M.S., Haque, M.I., Afzal, S.N., Naeem, M., Hussain T. and Naz. S., 2011. Quantitative losses and physical damage caused to wheat kernel (Triticum aestivum l.) by khapra beetle infestation. Pakistan J. Bot., 43: 659-668.

Alon, M., Alon, F., Nauen, R. and Morin, S., 2008. Organophosphates’ resistance in the B-biotype of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is associated with a point mutation in an ace1-type acetylcholinesterase and overexpression of carboxylesterase. Insect Biochem. mol. Biol., 38: 940-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.07.007

Assie, L.K., Francis, F., Gengler, N. and Haubruge, E., 2007. Response and genetic analysis of malathion specific resistant Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) in relation to population density. J. Stored Prod. Res., 43: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2004.12.001

Atkinson, B.L., Blackman, A.J. and Faber, H., 2004. The degradation of the natural pyrethrins in crop storage. J. Agric. Fd. Chem., 52: 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0304425

Bughio, F.M. and Wilkins, R.M., 2004. Influence of malathion resistance status on survival and growth of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), when fed on flour from insect resistant and susceptible grain rice cultivars. J. Stored Prod. Res., 40: 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00077-2

Byrne, F.J., Gorman, K.J., Cahill, M., Denholm, I. and Devonshire, A.L., 2000. The role of B-type esterases in conferring insecticide resistance in the tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn). Pestic. Manage. Sci., 56: 867-874. https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200010)56:10<867::AID-PS218>3.0.CO;2-P

Cao, C.W., Zhang, J., Gao, X.W., Liang, P. and Guo, H.L., 2008. Overexpression of carboxylesterase gene associated with organophosphorous insecticide resistance in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii (Glover). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 90: 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.11.004

Charpentier, A. and Fournier, D., 2001. Levels of total acetylcholinesterase in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to insecticide resistance. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 70: 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.2001.2549

Collins, P.J., Daglish, G.J., Pavic, H. and Kopittke, R.A., 2005. Response of mixed-age cultures of phosphine-resistant and susceptible strains of lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica, to phosphine at a range of concentrations and exposure periods. J. Stored Prod. Res., 41: 373-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2004.05.002

Cui, F., Weill, M., Berthomieu, A., Raymond, M. and Qiao, C.L., 2007. Characterization of novel esterases in insecticide resistant mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. mol. Biol., 37: 1131-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.07.002

Cygler, M., Schrag, J.D., Sussman, J.L., Harel, M., Silman, I., Gentry, M.K. and Doctor, B.P., 1993. Relationship between sequence conservation and three dimensional structure in a large family of esterases, lipases and related proteins. Protein Sci., 2: 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560020309

Daglish, G., 2008. Impact of resistance on the efficacy of binary combinations of spinosad, chloropyrifos methyl and s-methoprene against five stored grain beetles. J. Stored Prod. Res., 44: 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2007.06.003

Devonshire, A.L., 1975a. Studies of the acetylcholinesterase from the house fly resistant and susceptible organophosphorus insecticides. Biochem. J., 149: 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1490463

Devonshire, A.L., 1975b. Studies of the carboxylesterase of Myzuspersicae resistant and susceptible to organophosphorus insecticides. Proc. Br. Insect. Fungi Conf., 8: 67-73.

FAO, 1975. Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides: Tentative method for adults of some major pest species of stored cereals with methyl bromide and phosphine. FAO method No. 16, FAO Pl. Protec. Bull., 23: 12–25.

Fournier, D. and Mutero, A., 1994. Modification of acetylcholinesterase as a mechanism of resistance to insecticides. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C: Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol., 108: 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/1367-8280(94)90084-1

Gandhi, N., Pillai, S. and Patel, P., 2010. Efficacy of pulverized Punica granatum (Lythraceae) and Murraya koenigii (Rutaceae) leaves against stored grain pest Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Int. J. Agric. Biol., 12: 616-620.

Haq, T., Usmani, N.F. and Abbas, T., 2005. Screening of plant leaves as grain protectants against Tribolium castaneum during storage. Pakistan J. Bot., 37: 149-153.

Hosokawa, M., Furihata, T., Yaginuma, Y., Yamamoto, N., Koyano, N., Fujii, A., Nagahara, Y., Satoh, T. and Chiba, K., 2007. Genomic structure and transcriptional regulation of the rat, mouse, and human carboxylesterase genes. Drug Metab. Rev., 39: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602530600952164

Junge, W. and Klees, H., 1981. Arylesterase. In: Method of Enzyme Analysis, 3rd Ed., Vol. 4, Enzyme 2 esterases, glycosidases, ligases. Verlag Chemic, Florida, pp. 8-14.

Junge, W., Krisch, K. and Conney, A., 1975. The carboxyl esterases/amidases of mammalian liver and their possible significance. CRC Critical Rev. Toxicol., 3: 371-434. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408447509079864

Kestenholz, C., Stevenson, P.C. and Belmain, S.R., 2007. Comparative study of field and laboratory evaluations of the ethnobotanical Cassia sophera L. (Leguminosae) for bioactivity against the storage pests Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleopteran: Bruchidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 43: 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2005.11.003

Neoliya, N.K., Singh, D. and Sangwan, R.S., 2007. Azadirachtin based insecticides induce alteration in Helicoverpa armigera Hub. Head polypeptides. Curr. Sci., 92: 94-98.

Newcomb, R.D., Campbell, P.M., Ollis, D.L., Cheah, E., Russell, R.J. and Oakeshott, J.G., 1997. A single amino acid substitution converts a carboxylesterase to an organophosphorus hydrolase and confers insecticide resistance on a blowfly. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci., 94: 7464-7468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.14.7464

Oakeshott, J.G., Claudianos, C., Russell, R.J. and Robin, G.C., 1999. Carboxyl/cholinesterases: a case study of the evolution of a successful multigene family. BioEssays, 21: 1031-1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199912)22:1<1031::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-J

Oakeshott, J.G., Devonshire, A.L., Claudianos, C., Sutherland, T.D., Horne, I., Campbell, P.M., Ollis, D.L. and Russell, R.J., 2005. Comparing the organophosphorus and carbamate insecticide resistance mutations in choline and carboxyl-esterases. Chem. Biol. Interact, 157-158: 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.10.041

Ollis, D.L., Cheah, E., Cygler, M., Dijkstra, B., Frolow, F., Franken, S.M., Harel, M., Remington, S.J., Silman, I., Schrag, J., Sussman, J.L., Verschueren, K.H.G. and Goldman, A., 1992. The α/β hydrolase fold. Protein Engin., 5: 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/5.3.197

Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.D.A., Guedes, R.N.C., Sousa, A.H. and Totola, M.R., 2009. Phosphine resistance in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 45: 71-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2008.09.001

Pimentel, M.A.G., Faroni, L.R.D.A., Totola, M.R. and Guedes, R.N.C., 2007. Phosphine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored product insects. Pest Manage. Sci., 63: 876-881. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1416

Prakash, A. and Rao, J., 2006. Exploitation of newer botanicals as rice grain protectants against Angounmois grain moth Sitotroga cerealella Oliv. Entomon Trivandrum, 31: 1-8.

Rappaport, F., Fischil, J. and Pinto, N., 1959. An improved method for the determination of cholinesterase activity in serum. Clin. Chim. Acta, 4: 227-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(59)90134-2

Riaz, T., Shakoori, F.R. and Ali, S.S., 2014. Effect of temperature on the development, survival, fecundity and longevity of stored grain pest, Trogoderma granarium. Pakistan J. Zool., 46: 1485-1489.

Riaz, T., Shakoori, F.R. and Ali, S.S., 2016. Toxicity of phosphine against tolerant and susceptible populations of Trogoderma granarium collected from Punjab, Pakistan. Punjab Univ. J. Zool., 31: 2530.

Satoh, T. and Hosokawa, M., 2006. Structure, function and regulation of carboxylesterases. Chem. Biol. Interact, 162: 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2006.07.001

Shakoori, F. R., Feroze, A. and Riaz, T., 2016. Effect of sub-lethal doses of phosphine on macromolecular concentrations and metabolites of adult beetles of stored grain pest, Trogoderma granarium, previously exposed to phosphine. Pakistan J. Zool, 48: 583-588.

Sher, F., Ali, S.S. and Shakoori, A.R., 2004. Phosphine induced changes in various esterase levels in 4th instar larvae of Trogoderma granarium. Pakistan J. Zool., 36: 257-260.

Tang, Z.H., Gong, K.Y. and You, Z.P., 1988. Present status and countermeasures of insecticide resistance in agricultural pests in China. Pestic. Sci., 23: 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780230212

Taylor, R.W.D., 1989. Phosphine a major fumigant at risk. Int. Pest Contr., 31: 10-14.

Walter, V., 2006. Commodity and space fumigations in the food industry. In: Insect management for food storage and processing (ed. J.W. Heaps), 2nd Edition. AACC International, Minnesota, pp. 183-200.

Wang, D., Collins, P.J. and Gao, X., 2006. Optimising indoor phosphine fumigation of paddy rice bag stacks under sheeting for control of resistant insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 42: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2005.02.001

Zettler, L.J. and Arthur, F.H., 2000. Chemical control of stored product insects with fumigants and residual treatments. Crop Prot., 19: 577-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00075-2

Zhu, K.Y. and He, F., 2000. Elevated esterases exhibiting arylesterase like characteristics in an organophosphate resistant clone of the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 67: 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.2000.2488