Identification of Response Cost Analysis of Alternative Early Responses to Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreaks in Dairy Cattle in Malang District, Indonesia
Atsmarina Widyadhari1, Chaerul Basri2*, Etih Sudarnika2
1Graduate Student of Veterinary Biomedical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia 16680; 2Division of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia 16680
*Correspondence | Chaerul Basri, Division of Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia 16680; Email:
[email protected]
Figure 1:
SEIR simulation of FMD disease in low-density, medium-density, and high-density areas (in median values). Figure (a) shows a graph of the decrease in susceptible animals. Figure (b) shows the graph of increasing animals exposed to FMD disease. Figure (c) shows the graph of increasing FMD infected animals Figure (d) shows the graph of increasing FMD removed (recovered and dead) animals.
Figure 2:
Decision tree for FMD disease control at low density. CIE control is the best alternative at all HRP times. Values in the decision tree are presented as median (50th percentile).
Figure 3:
Decision tree for FMD disease control at medium density. CIV 3 km is the best alternative control at all HRP times if vaccination is forced. Values in the decision tree are presented as median (50th percentile).
Figure 4:
FMD disease control decision tree at high density. CIE control is the best alternative at HRP days 7 and 14, while CIV 3 km is the best alternative at HRP day 21. Values in the decision tree are presented as median (50th percentile).