Study on the Toxic Effects of Nano-Fipronil on the Physiological Aspects of Male Rabbits
Research Article
Study on the Toxic Effects of Nano-Fipronil on the Physiological Aspects of Male Rabbits
Qassim Ammar Ahmood AL-Janabi1*, Ahmed Hadi Abdul Saheb2, Aqeel Khaleel Ibraheem3
1Environmental Pollution Department, College of Environmental Sciences, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon 51013, Iraq; 2Environment Department, College of Environmental Sciences, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon 51013, Iraq; 3Ministry of Education, Education Babylon, Iraq.
Abstract | Fipronil is a broad-spectrum phenyl-pyrazole insecticide commonly used in agriculture. However, its residues in the environment pose a toxic threat to animals, bees, aquatic life, and humans, and it has been classified as a carcinogen. The present study aimed to investigate the adverse effects of sub-acute exposure to doses of 50 mg of fipronil (FPN) and 50 mg and 25 mg of nano-fipronil (N-FPN) on hematological parameters in male rabbits over a period of 45 days. The study involved twenty-four male rabbits, aged 11 months and weighing between 800-1200 g, which were randomly assigned to four equal groups. The results showed a significant reduction (P<0.05) in red blood cell count (RBC: 8.667±0.59 × 10^9/L) and an increase (P<0.05) in white blood cell count (WBC: 13.54±0.56 × 10^9/L) in the treated groups compared to the control. Additionally, liver and kidney enzymes were elevated (P<0.05) due to pesticide exposure, with AST at 59.65±1.19 U/L, ALT at 48.76±3.12 U/L, and ALP at 43.89±8.45 U/L. Uric acid levels (7.19±0.10 mg/dL) and urea levels (60.14±4.99 mg/dL) were also higher (P<0.05) compared to the control. Oxidative stress was indicated by elevated (P<0.05) MDA levels (3.89±0.17 nmol/mL) and catalase (CAT: 2.52±0.49 µmol/mL) activity compared to the control group. These findings highlight the adverse effects of fipronil on rabbits and suggest the need for strategies to mitigate exposure to pesticide agents in the environment.
Keywords | Hematological, Physiological, Fipronil, Toxicological, Rabbi
Received | July 28, 2024; Accepted | January 15, 2025; Published | February 22, 2025
*Correspondence | Qassim Ammar Ahmood AL-Janabi, Environmental Pollution Department, College of Environmental Sciences, Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon 51013, Iraq; Email: [email protected]
Citation | AL-Janabi QAA, Saheb AHA, Ibraheem AK (2025). Study on the toxic effects of nano-fipronil on the physiological aspects of male rabbits. J. Anim. Health Prod. 13(1): 166-170.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2025/13.1.166.170
ISSN (Online) | 2308-2801
Copyright © 2025 Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: 2025 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Pesticides are essential tools for farmers to control agricultural pests and protect crops, as well as to eliminate insects that transmit diseases to humans or animals (Atiya and Abdulhay, 2022; Al Defferi et al., 2019; AL-Janabi et al., 2021). Despite farmers’ awareness of the dangers associated with pesticide use and the negative effects they can have on human and animal health, as well as the environment (AL-Hedny et al., 2018; AL-Janabi et al., 2019), their widespread use continues to raise concerns about potential adverse impacts on human health, animal welfare, and the environment.
Fipronil is a broad-spectrum insecticide belonging to the phenylpyrazole chemical family, commonly used in agriculture. However, its residues in the environment pose a toxic threat to animals, bees, aquatic life, and humans, and it has been classified as a carcinogen (Zhou et al., 2021). While the future of nanotechnology in agricultural development looks promising, nano-pesticides, such as nano-fipronil, have emerged as potential alternatives. These nano-pesticides are among the key methods used by farmers to control agricultural pests that threaten crops and boost production (AL-Janabi et al., 2021). Nano-pesticides are engineered nano-materials designed for plant protection, aiming to minimize application losses, enhance leaf coverage, improve stability, and reduce the quantities of active ingredients in formulations (Khleif et al., 2020; Casillas et al., 2022). These formulations can include self-organized systems, such as liposomes, dendrimers, metallic and bimetallic nanoparticles, and active encapsulating ingredients like nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, and nanotubes. This study aims to investigate the toxic effects of nano-fipronil on the physiological aspects of male rabbits by examining biomarkers of liver function, kidney function, and oxidative stress. By understanding the potential risks associated with nano-fipronil, we can guide future research and develop strategies for its safe and sustainable use.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Material
Fipronil (FPN), 97% pure, was obtained from ISAGRO Company, USA. The concentration used in the study was prepared in the Environmental Technologies Laboratory at the College of Environmental Sciences, Al Qasim Green University. Nano-Fipronil (N-FPN) and liposome preparation were carried out at the College of Environmental Sciences, Al Qasim Green University, following the method described by Nakhaei et al. (2021).
Experiment Design
The experiment involved twenty-four male rabbits, aged 11 months and weighing between 800-1200 g, which were randomly divided into four equal groups for a 45-day testing period. Group (A) served as the control group, Group (B) was treated with 50 mg of Fipronil (FPN), Group (C) was treated with 50 mg of Nano-Fipronil (N-FPN), and Group (D) was treated with 25 mg of Nano-Fipronil (N-FPN) (AL-Janabi et al., 2023). The study followed the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of Al-Qasim Green University, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Iraq (no. 923A.E. in 14, 4, 2023).
Laboratory Analyses
At the end of the study, fresh blood samples were collected from the rabbits for biochemical tests, including a complete blood count (CBC). The isolated serum was then analyzed for liver function (activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), kidney function (urea, creatinine, and uric acid), and oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), and catalase (CAT)) following the methods outlined by AL-Janabi et al. (2024).
Statistical Analysis
The SPSS program (2012) was used to analyze the effects of the different groups, and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was applied to compare the means. A difference of less than 5% between the means was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Treating rabbits with different doses of N-FPN for 45 days did not result in any signs of death. Several studies in rabbits have suggested that FPN may cause specific neurotoxicity. Table 1 shows the effects of N-FPN on blood parameters in male rabbits over the 45-day period. An increase (P<0.05) in white blood cell (WBC) levels was observed compared to the control group, along with a decrease (P<0.05) in the number of red blood cells and hemoglobin levels (Wafa et al., 2013). Since iron is essential for hemoglobin, a reduction in hemoglobin concentration could be due to either a decrease in hemoglobin synthesis or an increase in hemoglobin oxidation. The iron deficiency in rabbits could be attributed to reduced food intake or a lack of iron-rich supplements, which are necessary for hemoglobin synthesis. Additionally, a decrease in hemoglobin concentration can be associated with impaired red blood cell production or issues in heme synthesis within the bone marrow (Ali et al., 2017).
Table 1: Effects of Fipronil and Nano-Fipronil on blood parameters in male rabbits.
Groups |
Mean ± S.D |
|||
RBC 109/L |
WBC 109/L |
PLT(109/L) |
H.b(g/dl) |
|
A |
9.982±0.54a |
9.766±0.31c |
891.9±11.32a |
18.783±0.41a |
B |
9.781±0.56a |
11.32±0.33c |
824.7±12.83a |
17.671±0.37a |
C |
8.989±0.57b |
12.56±0.35b |
785.8±13.45a |
15.346±0.33a |
D |
8.667±0.59c |
13.54±0.56a |
714.7±15.78a |
14.223±0.29a |
LSD |
0.46 |
0.62 |
31.19 |
1.51 |
RBC: Red blood cells; WBC: White blood cells; PLT: platelets: Hb: Hemoglobin; *(a, b, c, d) represent significant differences (P≤0.05) between the treated groups as compared to the control.
High WBC levels are indicative of an inflammatory response, which can also be triggered by certain parasitic infections. Defects in platelet structure, quantity, or stability can lead to bleeding or coagulopathy, which may ultimately result in death. An elevated platelet count can contribute to venous and arterial thrombosis (Mustafa et al., 2019). These findings align with those of Jaber et al. (2020).
Table 2 shows the effect of FPN and N-FPN on liver function in male rabbits. It was observed that significant increase (P<0.05) in the level of ALT, AST and ALP was recorded in the treated groups as compared to the control group. According to the results of the current study, compared to control rabbits, those treated with the pesticides experienced more significant liver and kidney damage, as indicated by elevated liver enzyme levels (Hajer and Al-Easawi, 2019). Liver function enzymes are commonly used to assess liver health, as they are crucial for detoxification, biochemical activities, and the production of energy components necessary for a variety of vital functions. They also serve as specific indicators of liver disease (Al-Hamawandy and Al-Bakri, 2020; Jaber et al., 2020). The observed rise in these enzymes could be indicative of liver dysfunction, which may alter the permeability of the liver membrane and interfere with the synthesis of these enzymes (AL-Janabi et al., 2024).
Table 2: Effects of Fipronil and Nano-Fipronil on liver function in male rabbits.
Groups |
Mean ± S.D |
||
AST(U/L) |
ALT(U/L) |
ALP(U/L) |
|
A |
42.22±1.08d |
33.62±0.79d |
25.17±2.67c |
B |
49.12±2.79c |
38.14±1.71c |
32.95±5.12b |
C |
53.76±3.19b |
42.67±2.59b |
37.59±6.23a |
D |
59.65±1.19a |
48.76±3.12a |
43.89±8.45a |
LSD |
2.62 |
3.82 |
7.18 |
AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; *(a, b, c, d) represent significant differences(P≤0.05) in the treated groups as compared to the control.
Table 3: Effects of Fipronil and Nano-Fipronil on kidney function in male rabbits.
Groups |
Mean ± S.D |
||
Urea(mg/dl) |
Uric acid (mg/dl) |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
|
A |
33.22±2.77d |
5.25±0.03d |
1.95±0.12a |
B |
42.81±3.09c |
5.96±0.06c |
2.09±0.23a |
C |
51.22±4.12b |
6.65±0.08b |
2.38±0.29a |
D |
60.14±4.99a |
7.19±0.10a |
3.46±0.37a |
LSD |
3.16 |
2.51 |
2. 39 |
*(a, b, c, d) represent significant differences(P≤0.05) in the treated groups as compared to the control.
The impact of Fipronil (FPN) and Nano-Fipronil (N-FPN) on male rabbit renal enzymes is shown in Table 3. Elevated (P<0.05) uric acid concentrations in rabbits treated with FPN could result from the breakdown of purines and pyrimidines, as well as increased production or the inability to excrete uric acid. Additionally, elevated (P<0.05) creatinine levels indicate compromised renal function (AL-Janabi et al., 2023). Previous studies have reported higher levels of uric acid, creatinine, and urea in rabbits exposed to pesticides (AL-Janabi et al., 2024).
Table 4: Effects of Fipronil and Nano-Fipronil on oxidative stress in male rabbits.
Groups |
Mean ± S.D |
||
MDA(nmol/ml) |
CAT (µmol/ml) |
GSH (µmol/ml) |
|
A |
2.21±0.12d |
0.94±0.11d |
63.92±4.34a |
B |
2.95±0.14c |
1.26±0.28c |
51.33±3.91a |
C |
3.11±0.15b |
1.97±0.36b |
47.21±3.01a |
D |
3.89±0.17a |
2.52±0.49a |
40.95±2.79a |
LSD |
0.76 |
0.59 |
2.39 |
MDA: Malondialdehyde; GSH: Glutathione; CAT: Catalase; *(a, b, c, d) represent significant differences(P≤0.05) in the treated groups as compared to the control.
Table 4 displays the effects of FPN and N-FPN on oxidative stress in male rabbits. MDA level and CAT activity was significantly (P<0.05) enhanced by the treatments of FPN and N-FPN as compared the control group. According to Wafa et al. (2013), these compounds increase oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation, LPO), which is linked to several liver and kidney diseases and damages the integrity of cellular membranes. Pesticides like fipronil have been shown to increase oxidative stress in animals, including effects on liver and kidney tissues (El-bendary et al., 2021). FPN leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in increased oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation (Sharma et al., 2018). Other studies suggest that FPN may increase oxidative stress in Cyprinus carpio (C. carpio), as evidenced by high lipid peroxidation levels and alterations in antioxidant enzymes (Sunaryani and Rosmalina, 2021; Sweeney et al., 2021). Three oxidative stress-related enzymes—MDA, GSH, and CAT—are essential for the transfer of intracellular receptors and the detoxification of bioactive substances, such as pesticides (Crayton et al., 2020). Particularly when GSH levels fall, these enzymes may produce reactive intermediates that could be harmful (Saheed et al., 2019).
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
All treatment groups showed a reduction in RBC levels compared to the control group, while WBC levels were increased in all treated groups. The results indicate that the adverse effects of Nano-Fipronil insecticide were more pronounced than those of Fipronil, leading to increased oxidative stress, as well as disruptions in liver and kidney functions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank to Dr. Adnan Mansor from College of Veterinary Medicine / Al-Qasim Green University, Babylon, Iraq for providing the appropriate facility to complete work.
NOVELTY STATEMENTS
The authors encourage the use of nanotechnologies in various daily applications and bio-fertilizers are one of these applications
AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS
All contributed to the writing of the research, the method of collecting samples, and the statistical analysis of the results discussed.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Atiya LR, Abdulhay HS (2022). DNA-damage in blood of welders occupationally exposed to welding fume using comet assay. Caspian J. Environ. Sci., 20(3):513-517.
Al Defferi ME, AL-Janabi QA, Mustafa SA, AL-Muttarri AK (2019). Phytoremediation of Lead and Nickel by Bassia Scoparia. Plant Arch., 19: 3830-3834.
AL-Janabi QA, Al- Kalidy SK, Hameed ZB (2021). Effects of heavy metals on physiological status for Schoenoplectus litoralis and Salvinia natans L 1st International virtual conference of environmental sciences. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 722 (2021): 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/722/1/012012
Ahmood QA, Al-Jawasim MH (2019). Effects of heavy metals on physiological status of plants. Plant Arch., 19(2): 2865-2871 e-ISSN:2581-6063, ISSN:0972-5210.
AL-Hedny S, Alshujairy QA, Al-Janabi QA (2018). Using remote sensing derived indices to monitor vegetation cover changes of babylon. Plant Arch., 18 (2): 2425-2428 e-ISSN:2581-6063, ISSN:0972-5210.
Al-Janabi QA, Lamees NH, Aqeel KI (2023). Effects of Nano-Fipronil on Male Rats’ Biochemical, Liver, and Renal Functions. Fourth Int. Sci. Conf. Agric. Environ. Sustainable Dev. Coll. Agric. Univ. Al-Qadisiyah, IRAQ. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1259/1/012033
Ali AL, Mani VM, Gokulakrishnan A, Alagesan D (2017). Protective Effect of Flavonoid Naringin on Lambda cyhalothrin Induced Haematological and Hepato-Pathological Variations in Male Wistar Rats. Hematol. Dis. Ther., 17 (2).
Al-Hamawandy H, Al-Bakri NA (2020). Analysis of Fatty Acids of Liver in Embryoand Adult of Domesticated Chicken Gallus GallusDomesticus. J. Global Pharm. Technol., 11(5):62-68.
Al-Janabi QA, Abdulhay HS (2024). Effect of Inhalation Exposure to Nano-Imidacloprid on Liver and Kidney Functions In Male Rats. Third Virtual International Conference on Environmental Sciences, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1325 (2024): 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1325/1/012021
Casillas A, Torre DA, Navarro I, Sanz P, Martínez MA (2022). Environmental risk assessment of neonicotinoids in surface water. Sci. Total Environ., 809:151161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151161
Crayton SM, Wood PB, Brown DJ, Millikin AR, McManus TJ, Simpson TJ, Ku KM, Park YL (2020). Bioaccumulation of the pesticide imidacloprid in stream organisms and sublethal effects on salamanders. Global Ecol. Conserv., 24: 01292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01292
El-bendary HM, Abdel moniem SH, Amr RZ, Abo El-Ela FI (2021). Characterization and in-vivo toxicological evaluation of imidacloprid nanoemulsion in rats. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., Vol 6, No 1.. https://doi.org/10.33865/wjb.06.01.0422
Hajer QG, Al-Easawi NA (2019). Histological Changes in the Lung and Liver of Mice Treated with Brake Pad Particles. Baghdad Sci. J., 16(2):2019. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.16.2.0306
Jayasiri MM, Yadav CN, Dayawansa ND, Propper CR, Kumar V, Singleton GR (2022). Spatio-temporal analysis of water quality for pesticides and other agricultural pollutants in Deduru Oya river basin of Sri Lanka. J. Clean Prod., 330:129897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129897
Jaber AT, Nawar R, Al-Bakri NA, Al-Bhadly AT (2020). Association Between Carbamazepine Toxicity, Liver Bile Duct Injury, Granuloma and Inflammatory Cells Infiltration in Female Mice. Indian J. Foren. Med. Toxicol., 14(4): 1773-1778.
Khleif AT, AL-Janabi QA, Ibraheem AK, (2020). Identification of quantity of heavy metals in different types of tobacco in shisha and cigarette brands. Plant Arch., 20(1): 214-216 e-ISSN:2581-6063 (online), ISSN:0972-5210.
Moradi FG, Hejazi J, Hamishehkar H, Enayati AA (2019). Co-encapsulation of imidacloprid and lambda-cyhalothrin using biocompatible nanocarriers: Characterization and application Article in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2019.
Mustafa AA, Mamdouh AM, Hoda MN, Awatef SM (2019). Effect of Imidacloprid and Tetraconazole on Various Hematological and Biochemical Parameters in Male Albino Rats (Rattus Norvegious).J Pol. Sci. Pub. Aff., 2014: 2:3.
Nakhaei P, Margiana R, Bokov DO, Abdelbasset WK, Jadidi Kouhbanani MA, Varma RS, Marofi F, Jarahian M, Beheshtkhoo N (2021). Liposomes: Structure, Biomedical Applications, and Stability Parameters with Emphasis on Cholesterol. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9:705886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.705886
Sharma P, Khan I, Singh R (2018). Curcumin and quercetin ameliorated cypermethrin and deltamethrin-induced reproductive system impairment in male wistar rats by upregulating the activity of pituitary-gonadal hormones and steroidogenic enzymes. Int. J. Fertil. Steril., 12(1):72.
Sunaryani A, Rosmalina RT (2021). Persistence of carbaryl pesticide in environment using system dynamics model. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., IOP Publ.623(1): 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/623/1/012048
Sweeney M, Thompson CM, Popescu VD (2021). Sub-lethal, behavioral, and developmental effects of the neonicotinoid pesticide imidacloprid on larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 40:1840–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5047
Saheed S, Jayashree M, Singhi S (2019). Effect of chronic exposure to Cadmium on serum lipoproteins and oxidative stress indices in male rats. Interdiscip. Toxicol., 8(3):115-154.
Wafa T, Nadia K, Amel N, Ikbal C, Insaf T, Asma K, Mohamed H (2013). Oxidative stress, hematological and biochemical alterations in farmers exposed to pesticides. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B, 48(12): 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2013.824285
Zhou Z, Wu X, Lin Z, Pang S, Mishra S, Chen S (2021). Biodegradation of fipronil: current state of mechanisms of biodegradation and future perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11605-3
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?