Alteration in Blood Stress Marker and Other Vitals of Saudi Medicos in Pre- and Post-Real Time Cardiac Catheterization Procedure

Maher Mohammed Yousef Alobaysi,1,4 Turki Albacker2, Waleed Alharbi2, Osama Almogbel2, Sadik Mohammed3, Fahad Al-Abbasi4, Vikas Kumar5 and Firoz Anwar4*

1Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, King Fahad Medical City, Saudi Arabia.

2King Saud University College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, India

4Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia

5Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shalom Institute of Health and Allied Sciences, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, India

ABSTRACT

Present work is a prospective cohort study that deciphers the alteration in stress marker and blood profile among trainee medicos during pre and post cardiac catherization procedure. Total 25 medicos were enrolled, only 10 were able to complete the criteria for the whole set of study, free from anxiety and were not on any medication before enrollment of study. Cortisol and white blood cells (WBC) count showed a significant difference in pre and post catherization procedures. Significant (P˂0.05) linear correlation was found between pre and post values for heart rate, WBC, electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cortisol, tri-iodothyronine, thyroxine, thyrotropin and Vit D in paired sample correlation. WBC counts measured before and after intervention were 5.81±1.12 and 5.19±0.98 respectively, which showed a significant fall in the WBC count and increase in cortisol after intervention. These alternations suggest to review and redesign the curricular or assigning duties to medicos under training.

Article Information

Received April 20 2020

Revised May 16 2020

Accepted August 08 2020

Available online 08 February 2022

(early access)

Published 23 September 2022

Authors’ Contribution

MMYA performed the experimental study. TA, WA, OA, SM, FAA and VK interpretate the biochemical data. FA designed the experimental study. All the authors proof read the manuscript.

Key words

Cardiac catheterization, Blood profile, Cortisol, Electrolytes, BUN

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20200420160412

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

0030-9923/2022/0006-2961 $ 9.00/0

Copyright 2022 by the authors. Licensee Zoological Society of Pakistan.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Training and recruitment of highly qualified medical student is essential to ensure patient life and safety (Preece et al., 2018). World Health Organization has reported that 37% in Saudi Arabia of total death are related to cardiovascular disease an alarming figure for Saudi Arabia (https://www.who.int/nmh/countries/sau_en.pdf?ua=1). In medical education physicians and surgeons are often faced with some of most tough and critical time sensitive decision in assessment of the disease and in a complex clinical environment (Cate et al., 2016). In order to gain the competency simulation technique is an attractive tool in surgical procedure especially in cardiac Catheterization labs (Wells et al., 2006), but still it is matter of debate that such simulation can be valid scale to determine the competency of the clinical setting in medicos (Brydges et al., 2015).

Cardiac catherization first reported by Forssmann-Falck (1997) with first report documented in 1953 was one of the major breakthroughs in the field of medical science that helped in management of congenital heart disease (CHD) in the last century. This facilitated mechanistic approach to cardiac physiology along with varied pathophysiology of heart. A technique to measure pressure, oxygen, amount of blood pumped, or any other heart related defects. Coronary angiography is a part to know the blockage in the arteries that supply the blood to the heart muscle where small inflated balloon followed by small metallic tube called stent is placed to keep the blood vessel propped open (Schwarz et al., 2018).

The young medicos often classified as generation Y born in between 1981-1999 are confident, pressured, team oriented and respectful (Borges et al., 2010) but surrounded by technology and is multitasking (Evans et al., 2016). Advancement of technology in medical and other allied medical field to some extent have relieved or ease out the job of medical interns and students (Nagra and Huntjens, 2020) but the advancement in simulation techniques to increase the performance is now constantly growing (Cook et al., 2014). Though there are reports that these simulation-based learning (Savoldelli et al., 2006) helps in procedure skills (Couto et al., 2015), and developing confidence for real time procedure (Bohnen et al., 2018) that can result in improved patient health (Zendejas et al., 2013). It is reported that activity pattern of physician or medicos is similar both in real time procedure and simulation procedure techniques (Manser et al., 2007). Similar pattern was observed in acute team performance in real time procedure versus simulation technique procedure (Couto et al., 2015). Real time catherization may lead to fear in Medicos, (Kwan et al., 2011). It can be stated and observed that multiple responsibilities, with additional catherization, research, clinics, teaching and continues improvement to care the community have adverse effect, due to multiple involvement that include diversified role in health system is like to have impact on their real ability during the process of catherization. Increase number of patients with decrease number of experts in catherization is one the real factor and which is of great concern. Along with this there is increase number of administrative work increase the prevalence of CHD patients (Jones et al., 2019). Catherization process does not involve one specialist it involves multiple expert that further decrease the patient normal physiology and mental capacity of these medicos (Sen et al., 2010). The thought for a better personnel and family life with ability to make themselves ready for next catherization procedure can lead to change in normal vitals of these medicos that can even lead to medical error (Jonas, 2017). It is observed that the medicos or the professionals associated with such regress work load also have financial pressure compare to other jobs make them one of the most suitable working professional who are under tremendous strain to give best to the patients (Jayaram et al., 2015). There is paucity of information in this area with incomplete methodology and limited application (Brydges et al., 2015). To date much have been done on this simulation-based procedure carried out by trainee versus real time procedure but what is lacking is relationship between pre and post catherization procedure and the alteration in stress marker during clinical training among the medicos.

Materials and methods

This is a prospective cohort pilot study from King Saud University College of Medicine. King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB number. E-18-3448). Health Sciences Colleges Research on Human Subjects, King Saud University College of Medicine. All the fellows enrolled in study were from King Saud University College of Medicine for the year 2019 (n=15) but only 7 fulfilled the criteria. Residents enrolled for study were informed and the consent to participate in study was obtained to record their biochemical blood profiling at pre and post cardiac catherization procedure. The data was collected from the medicos who were willing to cooperate in the study without any prejudice. All the selected medicos were free from anxiety and were not on medication before going for the sample collection. The sample collection technique was followed with modification of resuscitation assessment tool (RAT) (Weersink et al., 2019).

The medicos were subjected to cardiac catheterization procedure that helps them to diagnose and treat heart related problem. The medicos were allowed to relax and the blood sample were collected before going to catherization lab. Once they were again relaxed the medicos were allowed to enter the cardiac catheterization laboratory to perform the real time catherization technique under the supervision of expert. Once the cardiac catheterization procedure was over the medicos were allowed to relax for ten minutes and then the blood sample was again collected from them.

Standard Kits were utilized for analysis of blood profile with respect to HR, SBP and DBP WBC, RBC, HGB, PLT, CHOL, Na+, Cl-, K+, BUN, COR, FT3, FT4, TSH and VitD

The data were arranged and tabulated in Microsoft excel spread sheet. SPSS 18 was used to analyze the data. Normality was tested using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean±SD and analyzed using paired’ test.

Average or mean entrustment score were computed for each of the fellow trainee (FT) before and after the catherization procedure. The outcome was compared using Pearson product movement correlation coefficient to determine the linear relationship between mean value in pre and post result data followed by t test to know any variation in the data of paired sample. Further, any internal reliability among the samples were calculated to observe any variation in the results of pre and post catherization process (Weersink et al., 2019). Any unwanted missing link or data were excluded from the study of analysis. All the samples were coded for using inductive thematic analysis (Attride-Stirling, 2001).

Results and discussion

The observation phase took almost a year to get the best results from the enrolled medicos. Out of 15 only 7 were able to fulfill the criteria of study. There was no statically significant variation in P-value ˃ 0.05) between the medicos in terms age (36.6±6.9 year), weight (81.9±9.1 Kg) and height (174.7±7.6 cm).

Only cortisol and WBC count showed a significant different in their values both in pre-and post-catherization process carried out by the medicos (Table I).

A significant (P˂0.05) linear correlation was found between pre and post values for HR (0.046), WBC (0.003), Na (0.045), Cl (0.001), K (0.036), BUN (0.007), COR (0.02), FT3 (0.018), FT4 (0.001), TSH (0.001) and VitD (0.012), (Supplementary Table I). There was a significant fall in the WBC a significant increase in the COR after intervention. Further results demonstrate the strong linear association adjusted with catherization process in accordance with the existing literature (Huh et al., 2015), confirming the relationship as strong and consistent. Our results provide new insight on the usefulness of differential WBC count as predictors for stress in medicos.

Table I. Vital parameters and blood profiling and vitals in pre and post catherization process.

WBC, white blood cells; TSH, thyrotropin; FT4, thyroxine; FT3, tri-iodothyronine; CHD, congenital heart disease; RAT, resuscitation assessment tool; Vit D, vitamin D; HR, heart rate; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; COR, cortisol; FT4, thyroxine; TSH, thyrotropin; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RBC, red blood cells; HGB, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets; CHOL, cholesterol; Na+, sodium ion; Cl, chloride ions; K+, potassium ions.

The alteration in the cortisol level may be associated with mental fatigue. Our results are in concordance with the previous studies where mental fatigue associated with emotional stimuli (Watanabe et al., 2019; Izawa et al., 2017). The hectic job schedule and constant exposure to stress of patients can be another factor for the elevated level of cortisol (Simmons et al., 2016).

Conclusion

Present study clearly linked the alteration of cortisol association with mental fatigue of medicos, activities and training in their course of study. Rise in cortisol level is an indication of depressive symptoms that can lead to medical error. Stimulation studies can benefit the medicos before proceeding for real time cardiac catherization process with better output in terms of patient safety and medicos’ health. Increase in WBC count is another parameter which have drastically altered in medicos after the process of catherization. Alteration in WBC is associated with normal cardiac activity of humans.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Riyadh under the grant no. 1-17-03-009-0012.The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks KACST for technical and financial support.

Supplementary material

There is supplementary material associated with this article. Access the material online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20200420160412

Statement of conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Attride-Stirling, J., 2001. Qual. Res., 1: 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Bohnen, J.D., Demetri, L., Fuentes, E., Kathryn, B., Reza, A., Rahul, J.A., Emil, P., Haytham, M.A.K., Dante, Y., Noelle, S., David, K., Susan, B., George, C.V. and Marc, d.M., 2018. J. Surg. Educ., 75: 1357-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.001

Borges, N.J., Manuel, R.S., Elam, C.L. and Jones, B.J. 2010. Med. Educ. 44: 570-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03633.x

Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., Erwin, P.J. and Cook, D.A., 2015. Acad. Med., 90: 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000549

Cate, O., Ten, H.D., Ankel, F., Busari, J., Englander, R., Glasgow, N., Holmboe, E., Iobst, W., Lovell, E., Snell, L.S., Touchie, C., Melle, E.V. and Wycliffe-Jones, K., 2016. Acad. Med., 91:191-198. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001044

Cook, D.A., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S.J., Hatala, R. and Brydges, R., 2014. Adv. Hlth. Sci. Educ., 19: 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9458-4

Couto, T.B., Kerrey, B.T., Taylor, R.G., FitzGerald, M. and Geis, G.L., 2015. Simul. Healthc., 10: 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000081

Evans, K.H., Ozdalga, E. and Ahuja, N., 2016. Acad. Psychiat., 40: 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0399-5

Forssmann-Falck, R., 1997. Am. J. Cardiol., 79: 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00833-8

Huh, J.Y., Ross, G.W., Chen, R., Abbott, R.D., Bell, C., Willcox, B., Launer, L., Petrovitch, H., Kaya, B. and Masaki, K., 2015. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 63: 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13298

Izawa, S., Matsudaira, K., Miki, K., Arisaka, M. and Tsuchiya, M., 2017. Stress, 20: 386-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2017.1342808

Jayaram, N., Beekman, R.H., Benson, L., Holzer, R., Jenkins, K., Kennedy, K.F., Martin, G.R., Moore, J.W., Ringel, R., Rome, J., Spertus, J.A., Vincent, J.A. and Bergersen, L., 2015. Adjusting for risk associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization: A report from the NCDR IMPACT registry. Circulation, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014694

Jonas, R.A., 2017. Cardiol. Young, 27: 1939-1946. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951117002086

Jones, N.R., Taylor, C.J., Hobbs, F.D.R., Bowman, L. and Casadei, B., 2019. Eur. Heart J., 41: 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz834

Kwan, J., Huang, Y., Vales, L., Kato, S., Kami, M., Horie, K., Honda, T., Takizawa, T., Otomo, T. and Inoue, N., 2011. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 87: 1111-1117.

Manser, T., Dieckmann, P., Wehner, T. and Rall, M., 2007. Ergonomics, 50: 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130601032655

Nagra, M. and Huntjens, B. 2020. J. Med. Syst., 44: 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1477-0

Preece, R., Ben-David, E., Rasul, S. and Yatham, S., 2018. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 27: 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy119

Savoldelli, G.L., Naik, V.N., Joo, H.S., Houston, P.L., Graham, M., Yee, B. and Hamstra S.J., 2006. Anesthesiology, 104: 475-481. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200603000-00014

Schwarz, K., Ul Haq, M.A., Sidhu, B. and Nolan, J., 2018. Medicine (United Kingdom).

Sen, S., Kranzler, H.R., Krystal, J.H., Speller, H, Chan, G., Gelernter, J. and Guille, C., 2010. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 67: 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.41

Simmons, J.G., Badcock, P.B., Whittle, S.L., Whittle, S.L., Byrne, M.L., Mundy, L., Patton, G.C., Olsson, C.A. and Allen, N.B., 2016. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63: 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.004

Watanabe, K., Sasaki, A.T., Tajima, K., Mizuseki, K., Mizuno, K. and Watanabe, Y., 2019. Sci. Rep., 19: 8797.

Weersink, K., Hall, A.K., Rich, J., Szulewski, A. and Dagnone, J.D., 2019. Adv. Simul., 1;4: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0099-4

Wells, B., Gentry, M. and Ruiz-Arango, A., 2006. Am. J. Cardiol., 98: 474-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.053

Zendejas, B., Brydges, R., Wang, A.T. and Cook, D.A., 2013. J. Gen. Int. Med., 28: 1078-1089. https://www.who.int/nmh/countries/sau_en.pdf?ua=1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2264-5