Effects of Fermented Garlic on Blood Lipid Profiles and Carcass Quality in Turkeys
Short Communication
Effects of Fermented Garlic on Blood Lipid Profiles and Carcass Quality in Turkeys
Nguyen Hoang Qui*, Nguyen Thuy Linh
Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, School of Agriculture and Aquaculture, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh Province, Vietnam.
Abstract | The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of Lactobacillus spp.-fermented garlic (FG) on the carcass quality and lipid profile of turkey broilers. A completely randomized design was used for this study, which comprised of 90 turkeys aged 1 to 56 days. The study is composed of five different treatments, which are replicated three times. The allocation of treatments was balanced based on the sex of the broilers. The birds were provided with feed and water ad libitum. The experimental protocol involved the incorporation of an aqueous extract derived from fermented garlic (FG) into the animals’ drinking water. The highest weights for carcass, breast, and thigh were observed in the 0.8% FG treatment, while the 0.6% FG treatment resulted in the highest weights for liver and small intestine (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect of FG on the carcass quality or blood lipid markers (p > 0.05). The addition of a 0.8% fermented grain (FG) improved the carcass quality of turkey broilers, without negatively affecting the blood parameters. The utilization of 0.6% and 0.8% FG shows potential for extensive implementation in poultry production.
Keywords | Fermented garlic, Carcass traits, Blood lipid profile, Turkey broiler
Received | August 04, 2024; Accepted | October 05, 2024; Published | October 15, 2024
*Correspondence | Nguyen Hoang Qui, Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, School of Agriculture and Aquaculture, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh Province, Vietnam; Email: [email protected]
Citation | Qui NH, Linh NT (2024). Effects of fermented garlic on blood lipid profiles and carcass quality in Turkeys. J. Anim. Health Prod. 12(4): 584-590.
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2024/12.4.584.590
ISSN (Online) | 2308-2801
Copyright: 2024 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
INTRODUCTION
Recently, there has been a gradual expansion of turkey flocks, significantly contributing to the forward development of the poultry industry in Vietnam. This expansion has been driven by the growing demand for poultry meat in the country. However, the turkey industry faces notable challenges, particularly in encountering disease outbreaks, as it continues to expand.
The inclusion of medicinal additives, such as garlic, can be a potential dietary supplement that will enhance the growth performance and improve the carcass quality of avian species. Garlic is rich in essential nutrients and exhibits significant antibacterial properties. Moreover, its inclusion in animal diets has been shown to enhance digestive functions and promote the growth of various livestock species, including chickens. The use of garlic has been reported to positively affect various health conditions such as inflammation, oxidative stress, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension (Chen et al., 2021). Garlic is widely recognized in the field of alternative medicine for its extensive health benefits and is considered a remarkable pharmacological agent. It contains at least 33% sulfur-containing compounds, along with a diverse range of enzymes, amino acids, and minerals. The utilization of garlic as a notable dietary additive has been employed to augment the growth performance and many biochemical attributes of broiler chickens (Aarti and Khusro, 2020). Previous studies have demonstrated the advantageous impacts of aqueous garlic extract on the growth performance of poultry. The benefits observed were disease prevention, appetite stimulation, and enhancement of beneficial bacteria in the intestinal tract, leading to improved digestive functions and ultimately the accelerated growth of the animals. According to Karangiya et al. (2016), it was observed that the inclusion of garlic powder in the feed of birds resulted in enhancements of villus height in the small intestines. Other previous researches conducted on the impact of garlic supplementation on the growth performance of chicken has demonstrated that the inclusion of functional garlic has yielded positive impacts on performance indicators and blood parameters. Hossain et al. (2014) found that meals with fermented garlic (FG) exhibited a deceleration in the process of meat lipid oxidation. Additionally, these diets were found to result in reduced levels of triglycerides and total serum cholesterol when compared to the non-supplemented diet. Similarly, Borgohain et al. (2017) reported that the inclusion of garlic supplements in commercial broiler meals resulted in the reduction of blood cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels, and fat deposition. Furthermore, the study of Chen et al. (2021) has documented the stimulatory properties and enhanced chemical composition of garlic following fermentation by Lactobacillus. According to studies conducted by Lee et al. (2016) and Qui et al. (2024), the inclusion of FG in the diet of broiler chickens resulted in the enhanced growth performance, especially during the early rearing phase. Additionally, FG supplementation was also found to have a positive impact on the intestinal morphology and has increased certain blood parameters, although this information is not extensively documented.
Nevertheless, the impact of supplementing dietary FG supplementation on the blood lipid profiles and carcass attributes of turkeys remains uncertain. Given the limited research on the garlic by Lactobacillus spp.-fermented, the objective of this study is to investigate the effects of the various quantity of fermented garlic on the carcass quality and blood parameters of turkeys.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Location and ethical approval
This research was conducted at the experimental farm of Tra Vinh University, situated in the southern region of Vietnam. The study was carried out from December 2022 to February 2023. The research was approved by the Committee of Education and Research at Tra Vinh University, under Approval No. 401/2022/HĐ.HĐKH&ĐT-ĐHTV. All procedures adhered to the animal welfare regulations set forth by the Vietnamese Government.
Experimental design
A total of 90 Turkey chicks from 1-8 weeks of age were used in the study. The study employed a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications per treatment. Each experimental unit consisted of six turkey chicks, with an equal distribution of males and females (1:1 sex ratio). All experimental units were equipped with feeds and drinkers that were made accessible without any restrictions. The chicks were given unlimited access to feed and water for the whole duration of the trial.
The five treatment groups were given these different concentrations of aqueous fermented garlic (FG) extract added to the drinking water: 0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.8% FG as in FG0, FG1, FG2, FG3 and FG4. The aqueous extract derived from garlic fermented by Lactobacillus spp. was used within a duration of 2-3 hours.
The avian specimens were confined in iron enclosures, with a surface area of roughly 1.5 square meters, and were netted to prevent escape. The cage floors were covered with husks and Balasa bio-yeast. To mitigate potential adverse effects and maintain sanitary conditions, each cage was cleaned weekly.
Experimental feed
All ingredients were purchased from a nearby feed store located in Tra Vinh province. The chemical components were analysed prior to the formulation of the diets (Table 1). The chemical composition of the feed was analysed for dry matter, crude protein, organic matter, total minerals, calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P), following the guidelines set by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 1990). The formulation of the experimental feed was based on the growth phase (NRC, 1994), specifically for ages 1-28 days and 29-56 days of age. The feed formulation specifications are provided in Table 1.
The initial administration of the Newcastle vaccine was given when the avian specimens reached the age of 3 days, followed by a booster dose at 14 days of age. The vaccine used was formulated with F strain virus, which is recognized as the more prevalent virus strain responsible for infecting poultry in Vietnam. Furthermore, the Gumboro vaccine and highly pathogenic avian influenza vaccine were administered on the seventh and sixteenth day, respectively.
FG preparation
The preparation of fermented garlic (FG) followed the method described by Qui et al. (2024). 1 kilogram of fresh garlic was meticulously peeled and precisely sliced. The chopped garlic was treated with alcohol. Subsequently, the aforementioned blend was mixed with molasses and meticulously homogenized. Molasses serves as an integral element in the fermentation procedure, acting as a suitable substrate for the growth and proliferation of lactic acid bacteria. The mixture will be incubated for a duration of 10 minutes at ambient temperature, after which it was subjected
to additional stirring. Vinegar (1 litter) will then be added to accelerate the fermentation process and establish an
Table 1: The chemical compositions of ingredients in the diets.
Ingredients |
CP |
ME |
EE |
NFE |
CF |
Ca |
P |
OM |
DM |
Corn | 7.15 | 3699 | 1.8 | 88.2 | 1.24 | 0.004 | 0.140 | 98.4 | 87.2 |
Broken rice | 7.98 | 3488 | 0.91 | 90.7 | 0.10 | 0.020 | 0.100 | 99.7 | 86.2 |
Rice bran | 13.2 | 2608 | 8.25 | 63.6 | 7.60 | 0.030 | 2.030 | 92.6 | 88.7 |
Soybean | 45.5 | 2661 | 1.73 | 43.3 | 3.7 | 0.250 | 0.640 | 94.2 | 87.2 |
Fish meal | 50 | 3223 | 10 | 25.4 | 0.40 | 3.300 | 2.430 | 85.8 | 91.6 |
Stone meal | - | - | - | - | - | 37.9 | 0.01 | - | 100 |
Limestone | - | - | - | - | - | 39.7 | 0.01 | - | 100 |
Lysine | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 97.4 |
Methionine | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 99.3 |
Mineral-Premix | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100 |
CP: crude protein; DM: dry matter; EE: Ether extract; CF: Crude fat; Ca: Calcium; OM: organic matter; P: Phosphate; ME; Metabolizable energy.
Table 2: The experimental diets’ ingredient compositions.
Feed ingredients |
Growing period |
|
1-4 weeks of old |
5-8 weeks of old |
|
Rice bran | 29.0 | 28.3 |
Corn | 24.2 | 30.2 |
Soybean meal | 22.8 | 18.0 |
Broken rice | 13.0 | 12.7 |
Fish meal | 8.1 | 7.7 |
Limestone | 2.00 | 2.20 |
Salt | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Vitamin-Mineral Premix* | 0.30 | 0.30 |
Lysine | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Methionine | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Total | 100.0 | 100.0 |
ME (Kcal/kg) | 2,959 | 3,010 |
CP (%) | 21.0 | 19.0 |
Calcium | 1.28 | 1.34 |
Lysine | 1.28 | 1.18 |
Phosphate | 0.60 | 0.65 |
Methionine | 0.55 | 0.52 |
*: Vitamin– mineral premix was mixed according to growing phases of chickens.
acidic milieu within the combination, primarily through the presence of acetic acid. At this stage, Lactobacillus species will be introduced. Lactobacillus species (Lactobacillus spp. a comercial product, GGP Pharma company, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam) were then introduced at a concentration of 5 × 105 colony-forming units. A quantity of freshwater will be added into a container to achieve the final volume of 20 litters. Subsequently, the container will be subjected to an incubation period lasting from 7 to 14 days, during which it was kept at ambient temperature and shielded from direct exposure to sunlight. According to the study conducted by (Lee et al., 2016), the garlic to water ratio was reported should be 1:8. The abundance of Lactobacillus spp. was evaluated, and the pH of the combination was documented on a weekly basis. The amount of Lactobacillus should be at least 5 x 105. The mixture with decreased count of Lactobacillus spp. and/or with pH level exceeding 4.0, will be discarded.
Meat quality
On the final day of the experiment, the birds were chosen randomly and slaughtered (one female and one male bird from each replicate). To assess carcass quality, internal organ sizes, and meat quality, the carcasses were physically plucked and eviscerated on the day of slaughter. The weights of the whole carcass, as well as the cuts (thigh and breast), internal organs (the gizzard and liver), and immunological organs (spleen, thymus and bursa of Fabricius) were recorded using a digital scale. Using a digital pH meter (pH/ORP/Temperature Laboratory Bench Meter Mi 151, USA) with a spear-shaped electrode, the pH of the thigh and breast meat was assessed after the birds were slaughtered. The pH meter was cleaned and calibrated using manufacturer-provided standard solutions.
Cooking loss was determined by weighing thigh meat and breast meat samples of each experimental unit before and after cooking. The samples were cooked for 5 minutes in clean, fresh water and then were weighed again to calculate cooking loss (final weight subtracted from initial weight). Cooking loss will be calculated as the difference between the initial and final weights.
Blood profile
Blood samples (approximately 2 mL) were collected from two randomly selected birds of each experimental unit using 23-gauge needles using 5 mL disposable syringes at the end of the experiment. Blood samples were immediately transferred to haematological tubes containing the anticoagulant EDTA for haematological analysis.
Table 4: The effects of fermented garlic on carcass traits of turkey chickens at 56 days old.
Criteria |
Treatments |
SEM |
p-value |
||||
CTR |
FG1 |
FG2 |
FG3 |
FG4 |
|||
Live weight, g/bird |
878.3c |
901.0c |
981.7b |
1027ab |
1064a |
15.48 | 0.001 |
Carcass quality | |||||||
Carcass weight, g/bird |
546.1b |
561.6b |
611.8ab |
639.2a |
668.5a |
14.25 | 0.001 |
Carcass percentage, % | 62.17 | 62.37 | 62.32 | 62.19 | 62.82 | 1.337 | 0.997 |
Weight of breast, g/bird |
104.6c |
107.4c |
111.4bc |
120.4ab |
122.6a |
1.989 | 0.001 |
Breast percentage, % | 19.18 | 19.17 | 18.21 | 18.86 | 18.35 | 0.483 | 0.504 |
Weight of thigh, g/bird |
101.1b |
106.0ab |
112.5ab |
115.5ab |
121.6a |
3.942 | 0.031 |
Thigh percentage, % | 18.49 | 18.91 | 18.38 | 18.08 | 18.18 | 0.565 | 0.852 |
Organ weights, g/bird | |||||||
Weight of liver |
21.70b |
22.77b |
23.77ab |
26.60a |
24.70ab |
0.754 | 0.009 |
Weight of heart | 5.10 | 4.80 | 4.97 | 5.50 | 5.77 | 0.344 | 0.323 |
Weight of gizzard |
56.10b |
58.77ab |
65.30a |
58.63ab |
57.67b |
1.555 | 0.016 |
Intestine weight, g | |||||||
Small intestine |
32.97c |
41.17b |
45.33ab |
49.60a |
47.13ab |
1.300 | 0.001 |
Large intestine |
4.80d |
6.07cd |
7.53bc |
9.00b |
11.80a |
0.497 | 0.001 |
SEM: standard error of the mean. a, b, c means within a row with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Blood sample tubes were placed in a cooling bag, and blood samples were analysed within 48 h of collection. The samples were sent to an animal hospital for blood biochemical analysis using a Cobas 6000 analyser (Roche, Switzerland). The analysis included the determination (mg/dL) of albumin, total cholesterol, total protein, glucose, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), globulin and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c).
Data analyses
The data were initially processed using Microsoft Excel 365 and then analysed using a general linear model (GLM) with analysis of variance (ANOVA) in Minitab software 2016. The Tukey’s test was used to compare the means across different treatments with a confidence level of 95%. The statistical significance level is commonly represented as p < 0.05.
RESULTS and Discussion
Carcass quality
FG treatment improved the carcass quality (Table 4). Carcass weight was significantly higher in the treatments with 0.6% and 0.8% FG (p < 0.05). The breast and thigh weights were the highest in the treatment with 0.8% FG (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in carcass, breast, and thigh percentage. For internal organs, liver weight was significantly higher in the treatment with 0.6% FG (p < 0.05), while gizzard weight was the greatest in the treatment with 0.4% FG, and no differences observed in heart weight. The FG supplementation significantly increased intestinal weights, with the highest small intestine weight observed in the treatments with 0.6% FG and the highest large intestine weight in the 0.8% FG treatment.
Carcass quality
No significant effect of FG on carcass quality was observed, including the pH of breast and thigh meat and water-holding capacity (Table 5). Although the pH in the FG supplementation treatments appeared to be higher than that in the control treatment, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). After cooking, breast meat and thigh meat of the FG supplementation treatments retained more water than the meat from the control treatment.
The effects of FG on blood profiles of Turkeys at 56 days old
At 56 days of age, blood samples were collected from the birds to determine their profiles (Table 6). No significant differences between treatments were observed in any factor, including total protein, globulin, albumin, cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol (p > 0.05). Although higher globulin and lower cholesterol levels were recorded, these differences were not statistically significant.
An increase in growth performance along with the preservation of carcass quality and internal organs, was recorded in this study. This can be attributed to the effects of FG in this experiment. As mentioned above, fermentation of garlic enhances the abundance of chemical compounds, the nutritional value of garlic, and intestinal activities (Fadlalla et al., 2010; Sasi et al., 2021), thereby increasing the synthesis of protein in muscle and carcass weights. This finding was similar to the results of a previous study where 0.125%-1.25% garlic powder was added to starter broiler diets, which resulted to improved carcass and organ weights (Javandel et al., 2008).
Table 5: The effects of fermented garlic on carcass quality at 56 days old.
Criteria |
Treatments |
SEM |
p value |
||||
FG0 |
FG1 |
FG2 |
FG3 |
FG4 |
|||
pH | |||||||
Breast | 6.170 | 6.300 | 6.140 | 6.247 | 6.293 | 0.096 | 0.693 |
Thigh | 6.443 | 6.897 | 6.910 | 6.730 | 6.950 | 0.130 | 0.100 |
Before cooking | |||||||
Breast | 5.400 | 5.533 | 5.533 | 5.467 | 5.200 | 0.082 | 0.081 |
Thigh | 5.300 | 5.333 | 5.233 | 5.333 | 5.267 | 0.145 | 0.983 |
After cooking | |||||||
Breast | 3.633 | 3.833 | 3.833 | 4.067 | 3.733 | 0.161 | 0.450 |
Thigh | 3.700 | 3.900 | 3.767 | 3.900 | 4.000 | 0.079 | 0.132 |
Cooking loss (%) | |||||||
Breast | 32.72 | 30.78 | 30.76 | 25.57 | 28.28 | 2.482 | 0.356 |
Thigh | 30.08 | 26.79 | 28.02 | 26.67 | 23.95 | 2.384 | 0.512 |
SEM: standard error of the mean.
The intestinal weights increased with the supplementation treatment, partly suggests that birds consumed and digested more feed than the control treatments. Sunu et al. (2021) showed that carcass weights, liver weight, and intestinal length increased when FG was added to the diet. The stronger effect of garlic on reducing the fatty acid synthetase enzyme may also explain this improvement (Bawish et al., 2018).
However, this study found that FG did not affect meat quality, including pH and cooking loss. These findings were consistent with Ao et al. (2011), who demonstrated that the mean cooking loss did not differ among treatments, but the pH of breast meat decreased with increased levels of FG. In addition, cooking loss tended to decrease with increasing levels of FG in this study (non-significant). This shows that adding FG is beneficial to meet the quality requirements of turkey meat since the juiciness of meat decreases as cooking loss increases.
The mixture fermented by Lactobacillus spp. in the current study likely contributed to the effects recorded in this study. Previous studies have indicated the potential impact of Lactobacillus as a probiotic on meat quality (Zhang et al., 2017). The mechanisms of action of probiotics (particularly Lactobacillus) on meat quality (fat content and water content) remain unknown, although some researchers have linked the effects of probiotics on meat quality to the activity of bacteriocins or extracts.
In the current study, we observed a reduction in cholesterol levels in the FG supplementation treatments, although with no significant difference. Garlic has been shown to provide several health benefits, including hypocholesterolemic, hypolipidaemic, and antioxidant properties in humans and animals (Kothari et al., 2019). Steroidal saponins may be responsible for these effects; these compounds may prevent the absorption of cholesterol in the intestine, leading to reduced total cholesterol levels in the blood (Hossain et al., 2014). However, this study did not show the effects of garlic fermented by Lactobacillus. This could be due to the influence of numerous factors that can partly affect blood parameters, including season, age, rearing conditions, nutrition, and the type and amount of feed additives used.
In a study conducted by Prasad et al. (2009), it was observed that the inclusion of garlic powder in the feed led to a significant reduction in total cholesterol, LDL, and triglyceride levels in broilers. Additionally, the supplementation of garlic powder was found to raise the levels of HDL in these birds. The recorded results can be
Table 6: The effects of FG on blood lipid profiles.
Criteria |
Treatments |
SEM |
p-value |
||||
FG0 |
FG1 |
FG2 |
FG3 |
FG4 |
|||
Total protein, mg/dL |
3940 | 4077 | 3993 | 4027 | 4013 | 238.7 | 0.996 |
Albumin, mg/dL |
1243 | 1324 | 1249 | 1314 | 1278 | 53.61 | 0.753 |
Globulin, mg/dL |
2697 | 2753 | 2743 | 2710 | 2737 | 199.5 | 0.999 |
Glucose, mg/dL |
1804 | 1744 | 1689 | 1692 | 1715 | 60.26 | 0.657 |
Total cholesterol, mg/dL |
32.34 | 38.28 | 28.62 | 29.94 | 28.74 | 4.811 | 0.608 |
Triglycerides, mg/dL |
89.28 | 91.02 | 75.72 | 67.92 | 75.06 | 5.668 | 0.068 |
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL |
44.76 | 48.24 | 34.50 | 30.90 | 35.10 | 4.992 | 0.142 |
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL |
22.92 | 25.38 | 28.20 | 23.40 | 26.88 | 3.943 | 0.855 |
SEM: standard error of the mean; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein.
attributed to the hypocholesterolemic and hypolipidemic modes of action exhibited by garlic. Consequently, these innate characteristic of garlic reduced the hepatic activities of enzymes involved in cholesterol and lipid synthesis, including malic enzyme, fatty acid synthase, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Kairalla et al., 2022).
CONCLUSIONS and Recommendations
The supplementation of 0.8% garlic fermented by Lactobacillus spp. in the drinking water of turkeys resulted in the improved carcass weights and increased liver, gizzard, and intestinal weights. However, it did not affect the thigh and breast meat carcass percentages. It did not also affect the overall meat quality. Furthermore, this study did not observe any significant difference in the blood profiles of turkeys at 56 days of age.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Tra Vinh University (TVU) for this study.
Novelty Statement
Most previous studies have focused on the supplementation of garlic and garlic powder on the growth performance of chickens, mainly broilers. However, our study is novel in that it only focuses on the effects of fermented garlic on the carcass quality of turkeys and blood parameters when supplemented in drinking water.
Author’s Contribution
Qui NH and Linh NT: Research design; Linh NT: Data analysis; Qui NH: Methodology; Qui NH: Validation; Linh NT: Investigation; Qui NH and Linh NT: Writing-original draft preparation; Qui NT and Linh NT: Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Aarti C, Khusro A (2020). Role of garlic (Allium sativum) as feed supplements in poultry industries: An overview. World News Natl. Sci., 29: 151–161.
Ao X, Yoo JS, Zhou TX, Wang JP, Meng QW, Yan L, Cho JH, Kim IH (2011). Effects of fermented garlic powder supplementation on growth performance, blood profiles and breast meat quality in broilers. Livest. Sci., 141: 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.002
AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. AOAC, Washington, D.C.
Bawish BM, Fayed RH, Abdel-Razek AH (2018). Effect of garlic as feed additive on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of muscovy ducks reared in different stocking densities. J. Appl. Vet. Sci., 3: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.21608/javs.2018.67162
Borgohain B, Mahanta J, Islam R, Sapcota D, Sarma S, Borah M (2017). Effect of feeding garlic (Allium sativum) as prebiotic on the performance of broiler chicken. Int. J. Livest. Res., 7: 225-233. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170520043023
Chen J, Wang F, Yin Y, Ma X (2021). The nutritional applications of garlic (Allium sativum) as natural feed additives in animals. PeerJ, 9: e11934. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11934
Fadlalla IMT, Mohammed BH, Bakhiet AO (2010). Effect of feeding garlic on the performance and immunity of broilers. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 4: 182–189. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2010.182.189
Hossain MM, Lee SI, Kim IH (2014). Effect of dietary Korean aged garlic extract by Leukonostoc citreum SK2556 on production, hematological status, meat quality, relative organ weight, targeted Escherichia coli colony and excreta gas emission in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 198: 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.09.015
Javandel F, Navidshad B, Seifdavati J, Pourrahimi GH, Baniyaghoub S (2008). The favorite dosage of garlic meal as a feed additive in broiler chickens ratios. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 11: 1746–1749. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1746.1749
Kairalla MA, Alshelmani MI, Aburas AA (2022). Effect of diet supplemented with graded levels of garlic (Allium sativum L.) powder on growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood hematology, and biochemistry of broilers. Open Vet. J., 12: 595–601. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i5.1
Karangiya VK, Savsani HH, Patil SS, Garg DD, Murthy KS, Ribadiya NK, Vekariya SJ (2016). Effect of dietary supplementation of garlic, ginger and their combination on feed intake, growth performance and economics in commercial broilers. Vet. World, 9: 245–250. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.245-250
Kothari D, Lee WD, Niu KM, Kim SK (2019). The Genus Allium as poultry feed additive: A review. Animals (Basel), 9: 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121032
Lee KW, Lee KC, Kim GH, Kim JH, Yeon JS, Cho SB, Chang BJ, Kim SK (2016). Effects of dietary fermented garlic on the growth performance, relative organ weights, intestinal morphology, cecal microflora and serum characteristics of broiler chickens. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 18: 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0242
NRC (1994). Nutrient requirements poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Prasad R, Rose MK, Virmani M, Garg SL, Puri JP (2009). Lipid profile of chicken (Gallus domesticus) in response to dietary supplementation of garlic (Allium sativum). Int J. Poult. Sci., 8: 270–276. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276
Qui NH, Linh NT, Thu NTA, Nang K, Nhan Hoai P, Minh BN, Tu Tai N, Luc D D, Triatmojo A (2024). Immunological Response and Nutritional Effects of Lactobacillus spp.-fermented Garlic on Turkey Broilers. Arc. Razi Institute., 79: 345-354. http://doi.org/10.32592/ARI.2024.79.2.345
Sasi M, Kumar S, Kumar M, Thapa S, Prajapati U, Tak Y, Changan S, Saurabh V, Kumari S, Kumar A, Hasan M, Chandran D, Radha, Bangar SP, Dhumal S, Senapathy M, Thiyagarajan A, Alhariri A, Dey A, Singh S, Prakash S, Pandiselvam R, Mekhemar M (2021). Garlic (Allium sativum L.) bioactive and its role in alleviating oral pathologies. Antioxidants (Basel). 10: 1847. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111847
Sunu P, Sunarti D, Mahfudz LD, Yunianto VD (2021). Effect of synbiotic from Allium sativum and Lactobacillus acidophilus on hematological indices, antioxidative status and intestinal ecology of broiler chicken. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 20: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2020.12.005
Zhang A, Young JR, Suon S, Ashley K, Windsor PA, Bush RD (2017). Investigating the financial impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on smallholder pig farmers in Cambodia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 49: 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1264-1
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?