Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from around Bougainvillea spectabilis L. from Pakistan
Research Article
Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from around Bougainvillea spectabilis L. from Pakistan
Samreen Khan*, Salma Javed and Nasira Kazi
National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan.
Abstract | A population of Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. was retrieved from soil sample collected around roots of paper flower (Bougainvillea spectabilis L.), thoroughly described and illustrated from village Sarai Naurang located in southern district Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The population was identified as new species and related with Group 2 of Aphelenchoides species, distinguished via length of female’s body 428-444 µm (0.42-0.44 mm), cephalic region rounded and offset. Lateral field found with three incisures. Cuticle finely annulated, about 1µm apart. Stylet 10 µm (10±0), delicate with minute basal knobs. Excretory pore located 2 µm anterior to the metacarpus and 44 µm from cephalic end. Vulva anteriad, having slight elevated anterior and posterior lips. Post urine sac (PUS) short (15-20 µm), and covering 16.6-20% of vulva-anus distance. Tail small (24-26.5 µm), conical, about 3 times long to anal diameter and with a small, single mucro (1 µm).
Received | June 10, 2021; Accepted | December 31, 2021; Published | June 10, 2022
*Correspondence | Samreen Khan, National Nematological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan; Email: samreenkhan3336@gmail.com
Citation | Khan, S., S. Javed and N. Kazi. 2022. Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from around Bougainvillea spectabilis L. from Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 38(3): 784-789.
DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2022/38.3.784.789
Keywords | Aphelenchoides bougainvilli, New species, Morphology, Sarai Naurang, District Lakki Marwat
Copyright: 2022 by the authors. Licensee ResearchersLinks Ltd, England, UK.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Nematodes and fungi are considered the most rich organisms in soil environment and offer substantial role in ecosystem as well as perform central part in sustaining the stability of food webs and nutrient recycling (Zhang et al., 2020).
The genus Aphelenchoides (Fischer, 1894) representing species rich group in order Aphelenchida. They are found in soil and also have been associated with lichens, moss and algae from coniferous trees, twigs and bark (on and under) and insect frass from trees. Few species of Aphelenchoides are facultatively ecto and endoparasites of plant and are known as foliar and bulb nematodes while most of them leads mycetophagous life style or fungivorous nematodes (Hunt, 1993). Foliar nematodes are generally infectious agent of flowering plants in nurseries, greenhouses, growing crops as well as timber plants. The damages produced by them can be a reason of marketability difficulties in flowerings due to interfere with presence of plant or decreases production of crops (Sanchez Monge et al., 2015). Aphelenchus and Aphelenchoides spp may fed upon fungi and would be a good biological control agents counter to several plant parasitic nematodes and plant pathogenic fungi (Lamondia and Timper, 2016).
Approximately, 200 species of Aphelenchoides have been described worldwide (Kim et al., 2018) while, Handoo et al. (2020) after conducting a through literature review, they assigned 182 valid nominal species to the genus Aphelenchoides. According to the compilation of Pakistani nematode species, the genus Aphelenchoides contained 19 species (Shahina et al., 2019). After that, further five species comprising three new and two known species were also added (Salma et al., 2020; Samreen et al., 2020; Salma et al., 2021). In addition, during recent study the population of new species designated as Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. were obtained from soil around paper flower (Bougainvillea spectabilis L.) at Sarai Naurang village, district Lakki Marwat, KPK, Pakistan. The objective of the study was: documentation of new aphelenchid nematodes species of their significant biologically importance in agricultural system as thoroughly described in current research article.
Materials and Methods
Host and locality
The soil was obtained around the rhizosphere of paper flower (Bougainvillea spectabilis L.) up to 25cm depth using garden tool i.e., hand trowel from village Sarai Naurang (GPS: 32°49’43.0”N 70°46’33.0”E), district Lakki Marwat, KPK, Pakistan.
Processing of soil sample
Nematodes were taken out from soil as per Cobb’s sieving and decanting technique (Cobb, 1918), then further run by Baermann’s funnel method (Baermann, 1917). Killing process of retrieved nematodes was done by means of boiled water (approximately 80-90ºC) and immediately preserved in Tri-ethanol Amine Formaline (TAF) for next one day for hardening effect (Courtney et al., 1955). Specimens cleaned thrice by purified water for exclusion of excess fixative, thereafter 2ml glycerin (1.25%) were added and placed in incubator at 55ºC for about 5-6 days for slow dehydration (Seinhorst, 1959). Permanent mounting was ensured in glycerin drop. Cover slip (19mm) was placed over the drop with the provision of wax lumps from four sides, subsequently heated and finally sealed as wax melted (Hooper et al., 2005).
Light microscopy
For taxonomical purpose specimens were examined, morphologically identified and subsequently measured according to the formula of de Man (1884) as (L= whole body length; a= whole body length/width; b’= whole body length/esophagus; c= length of whole body/ tail length; c’= length of tail/ anal diameter; V%= head-vulva distance/ whole body length x 100; G1%= length of anterior ovary/whole body x 100). The illustration was worked out via camera lucida under compound microscope. Photographs were taken through digital camera (Nikon DS-fi-1) fixed with compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse E-400).
Results and Discussion
Systematics
Order: Aphelenchida Siddiqi (1980)
Superfamily: Aphelenchoidea (Fuchs, 1937) Thorne, 1949
Family: Aphelenchoididae (Skarbilovich, 1947) Paramonov, 1953
Subfamily: Aphelenchoidinae Skarbilovich, 1947
Genus: Aphelenchoides Fischer (1894)
Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp.
Table 1: Morphometric data of Aphelenchoides bougainvillii n. sp. All
measurements are in µm in the form of Mean±SD (range) except L (mm).
Morphological characters |
Holotype female |
Paratype females (n=15) |
L (mm) |
0.43 |
0.43±0.58 (0.42-0.44) |
a |
30.7 |
32.81±1.91 (30-35.5) |
b' |
3.9 |
4.0±0.19 (3.8-4.4) |
c |
16.5 |
15.4±1.00 (14-17) |
c' |
2.8 |
2.7±0.22 (2.5-3.1) |
V% |
71.9 |
71.4±0.81 (70.6-73) |
Lip width |
6 |
5.7±0.21 (5.5-6) |
Lip height |
2 |
2.1±0.15 (2-2.4) |
G1 % |
33.1 |
36.6±3.64 (32-42) |
Stylet |
10 |
10±0 (10) |
Conus length |
5 |
5±0 (5) |
Procorpus |
46 |
47±1.85 (45-50) |
Pharyngeal length |
108 |
107.5±1.87 (105-110) |
Distance to the base of median bulb |
60 |
62±2.30 (59-66) |
Median bulb length |
13 |
12.8±0.42 (12.5-13.2) |
Median bulb width |
9 |
9.2±0.21 (9-9.5) |
Median bulb ratio (L/W) |
1.4 |
1.3±0.04 (1.3-1.4) |
Width at median bulb |
14 |
14±1.65 (12-16) |
Nerve ring |
66 |
68.5±1.68 (66-71) |
Excretory pore |
44 |
43.9±0.75 (43-45) |
Max. body width |
14 |
15.9±1.35 (14-18) |
Width at vulva |
13 |
13.3±0.43 (13-14) |
Post uterine sac (PUS) |
20 |
17.1±2.08 (15-20) |
Overall ovary length |
143 |
143.9±2.45 (140-148) |
Tail |
26 |
25.2±0.84 (24-26.5) |
Anal body width |
9 |
9±0.75 (8-10) |
Rectum length |
7 |
6.9±0.86 (6-8) |
Vulva-anus distance |
98 |
95.1±3.11 (90-99) |
Mucro |
1 |
1±0 (1) |
Description
Female: Habitus of body usually smaller, slender shaped, tapering at both ends, ventrally concave and dorsally convex upon fixation. Cuticle is finely annulated, approximately 1µm apart with a lateral field with three incisures, consisting about 15% of corresponding body width. Cephalic end rounded, offset from body contour, about 6 µm wide, 2 µm high. Stylet delicate, measured 10 µm (10±0) having minute basal swelling. Conus part of stylet approximately 50% of the entire length. Procorpus cylindrical. Metacarpus oblong, with highly strong valves situated centrally to slightly posteriorly, approximately 9 µm wide and 13 µm in length. Excretory pore positioned at 2 µm anterior to the median bulb, the position is approximately 1/12th of metacarpus length. Isthmus long. Nerve ring placed just posterior to metacarpus and approximately half of the metacarpus length. Hemizonid invisible. Pharynx slender, about three times long to body diameter, overlapping intestine dorsally. Intestine simple.
Genital system prodelphic and monodelphic, eggs designed in single row. Spermatheca well developed, packed with usually small rounded sperms. Vagina oblique with thick walled. Vulva with slight raised lips. Rectum is approximately 0.7-0.8 times to anal width. PUS short, usually no sperms, extending about 16.6-20% of vulva to anal distance. Tail small, conical, approximately three times long to anal diameter, with small mucro.
Male: Not found.
Differential diagnosis and relationship: Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. categorized via length of female’s body (0.42-0.44mm). Lateral field with three incisures. Cephalic end offset, rounded. Cuticle finely annulated, approx. 1µm apart. Stylet 10 µm (10±0) with minute basal knobs. Excretory pore situated 2 µm anterior to the metacarpus and measured about 44 µm from cephalic region. Tail conoid with small mucro. Based on grouping scheme of Aphelenchoides species (Shahina, 1996), newly prescribed species is related to Group II having “one or may be two mucronate structures on tail terminus”. As per excretory pore location, the population of new species found nearest to four species belonging to Group II including Aphelenchoides eradicitus Eroshenko (1968), Aphelenchoides parabicaudatus Shavrov (1967), Aphelenchoides platycephalus Eroshenko (1968), Aphelenchoides submersus Truskova (1973) and one species of Group I viz., Aphelenchoides rotundicaudatus Fang et al. (2014).
Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. differentiated from Aphelenchoides eradicitus in larger body length (0.42-0.44 vs 0.30-0.31 mm); greater a and c ratios (a=30-35.5 vs 23.4-23.9; c= 14-17 vs 7.1-8.3); slightly posterior located vulva (70.6-73 vs 64%); excretory pore 2 µm above median bulb against at mid of median bulb and lateral field (3 vs 4). From Aphelenchoides parabicaudatus, new species differs by larger body length (0.42-0.44 vs 0.31-0.35 mm); higher a and c ratios (a= 30-35.5 vs 21.4-26; c= 14-17 vs 10.5-12.7); lower c’ value (2.5-3.1 vs 3.7); more posterior located vulva (70.6-73 vs 61-64%); stylet length (10 µm (10±0) vs 8 µm) and lateral field (3 vs 4). From Aphelenchoides platycephalus in larger body length (0.42-0.44 vs 0.24-0.27 mm); greater a and c ratios (a= 30-35.5 vs 24-27.8; c= 14-17 vs 9.1); posterior located vulva (70.6-73 vs 67.7-69%) and lateral lines (3 vs 4). From Aphelenchoides submersus, the new species differs in slightly shorter body length (0.42-0.44 vs 0.49-0.72 mm); lower stylet length (10 vs 13 µm) and in lateral lines (3 vs 4). Further, it also distinguished from Aphelenchoides rotundicaudatus for having excretory pore one body diameter anterior to metacarpus. Also new species differs in slightly longer stylet length (10 vs 8-9 µm); from head to excretory pore (43-45 vs 27-33 µm) and in lateral lines (3 vs 4).
The new species also compared with A. acacia Samreen et al. (2020) and A. marwataensis (Salma et al. 2021). New species differ from A. acacia in higher c ratio (14-17 vs 9.6-12.3); lower c’ ratio (2.5-3.1 vs 4.3-5.7); greater V% (70.6-73 vs 60.3-67.5); smaller stylet (10 vs 11-13 µm); smaller tail (24-26.5 vs 35.2-45 µm) and location of excretory pore (anterior to median bulb vs posterior to median bulb). From A. marwataensis new species differ in smaller c’ ratio (2.5-3.1 vs 3.4-4.2); greater V% (70.6-73 vs 68.8-70.2); smaller stylet (10 vs 10-12 µm); smaller tail (24-26.5 vs 29.6-34 µm); smaller PUS (15-20 vs 34-38 µm); excretory pore location (anterior to median bulb vs posterior to median bulb) and shape of tail terminus (bifid with ventral mucro vs conoid, arcuate ventral mucro).
Type habitat and locality: Population of new species was retrieved from soil around roots of paper flower (Bougainvillea spectabilis L.) from village Sarai Naurang (GPS: 32°49’43.0”N 70°46’33.0”E), district Lakki Marwat, KPK, Pakistan.
Type specimens: Holotype female as well as paratype females forwarded to Nematode Collection Lab at National Nematological Research Centre (NNRC), University of Karachi (UoK), Karachi, Pakistan.
Etymology: Aphelenchoides bougainvilli n. sp. allotted its name according to type host paper flower (Bougainvillea spectabilis L.).
Conclusions and Recommendations
The genus Aphelenchoides with its typically small worm-shaped body, exist in diverse habitat. The newly prescribed species belongs to one of the species rich genus of the order Aphelenchida, isolated from paper flower and thoroughly described in detailed from remote areas such as southern district i.e., Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The close morphological scrutiny of the said new species evidently separated from seven species and categorized in group II of assemblage system of Aphelenchoides species. Furthermore, Aphelenchid nematodes has significant biological and agricultural importance in the soil ecosystem hence, it is recommended that further consideration is to be required to unearth the additional species and to study their biology as well ecology for better agricultural productions and plant health.
Novelty Statement
The current research effort provides existence as well as morphological data about the novel fungivores nematode species that having a great biologically and agricultural importance. This discovery in scientific world will be useful to facilitate future identification of additional species in the order Aphelenchida from unexplored areas of district Lakki Marwat, KPK, Pakistan.
Authors’ Contribution
Samreen Khan: designed the study as well as carried out surveys, processed samples followed by measurements, identified species, line drawing, photography and finely drafted the manuscript.
Salma Javed: Supervised and thoroughly reviewed the manuscript.
Nasira Kazi: Helped in identification and revising the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors stated that non-conflict of any interest.
References
Baermann, G., 1917. Eine einfachemethode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) larvenin Erdprobem. Geneesk, Tijdschrift. Nederland, 57: 131-137.
Cobb, N. A., 1918. Estimating the nema population of soil. Agric. Tech. Circ. US Dep. Agric. I. 48pp.
Courtney, W.D., D. Polley and V.L. Miller. 1955. TAF, an improved fixative in nematode technique. Pl. Dis. Rep., 39: 570-571.
de Man, G., 1884. Diefrei in der reinen Erde und in sussen Wasser lebenden Nemaloden der niederldndischen Fauna-Eine systemalische-faunislische Monographie, Leiden, The Nemerlands, pp. 206. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46884
Eroshenko, A.S., 1968. Three new species of Aphelenchoides (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae). In: Parasites of animals and plants. Moscow, Nauka, No 4: 224-228 (in Russian).
Fang, Y., X. Wang, J. Gu and H. Li. 2014. Description of Aphelenchoides rotundicaudatus n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) found in packaging wood from South Korea. Nematol., 16: 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00002805
Fischer, M., 1894. Ubereine Clematis-Krankheit. Ber. Physiol. Lab. Landw. Inst. Halle, 3: 1–11.
Handoo, Z., M. Kantor and L. Carta. 2020. Taxonomy and Identification of Principal Foliar Nematode Species (Aphelenchoides and Litylenchus). Plants, 9: 1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111490
Hooper, D.T., J. Hallmann and S.A. Subbotin. 2005. Methods of extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes. In. Luc, M., Sikora, R.A. and Bridge, J. (Eds.) Plant parasitic nematodes in sub-tropical and tropical agriculture 2nd Edition. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK. 53-86 pp. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851997278.0053
Hunt, D.J., 1993. Aphelenchida, Longidoridae and Trichodoridae: Their systematic and bionomics. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 372.
Kim, J., T. Kim and J. Park. 2018. First record of Aphelenchoides nonveilleri (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) from South Korea. Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers, 34: 110-113.
Lamondia, J. and P. Timper. 2016. Interactions of microfungi and plant-parasitic nematodes. In: Biology of Microfungi. Springer International Publishing: Berlin/ Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29137-6_23
Salma, J., A.K. Tabassum and K. Samreen. 2020. A new record of parasitic nematode Aphelenchoides macrospica (Aphelenchida: Aphelenchoididae) from Pakistan. FUUAST J. Biol., 10: 9–12.
Salma, J., K. Samreen and K. Nasira. 2021. Description of Aphelenchoides marwataensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) with observation on Ektaphelenchoides poinari Aliramaji et al., 2014 and Paraphelenchus myceliophthorus Goodey, 1958 from District Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pak. J. Phytopathol., 33/153-170. https://doi.org/10.33866/phytopathol.033.01.0656
Samreen, K., A.K. Tabassum, K. Nasira, J. Salma and F. Shahina. 2020. Description of Aphelenchoides acacia n. sp. and Aphelenchoides naurangiensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) with observation on Aphelenchoides saprophilus Franklin, 1957 from District Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 38: 161-170. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjn/2020/38.2.161.170
Sanchez, M., A. Flores, L. Salazar, S. Hockland and W. Bert. 2015. An updated list of the plants associated with plant-parasitic Aphelenchoides (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) and its implications for plant-parasitism within this genus. Zootaxa, 4013: 207–224. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4013.2.3
Seinhorst, J.W. 1959. A rapid method for the transfer of nematode from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematol., 4: 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529259X00381
Shahina, F. 1996. A diagnostic compendium of the genus Aphelenchoides Fischer, 1894 (Nematoda: Aphelenchida) with some new records of the group from Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 14: 1-32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275029022.
Shahina, F., K. Nasira, K. Firoza and Y.I. Erum. 2019. Overview of the nematode fauna of Pakistan. Pak. J. Nematol., 37: 171-243. https://doi.org/10.18681/pjn.v37.i02.p171-243
Shavrov, G.N. 1967. [Three new species of Aphelenchoides Fischer, 1894 (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae).] Zoologichesky Zhurnal, 46: 762-764.
Siddiqi, M.R. 1980. The origin and phylogeny of the nematode orders Tylenchida Thorne, 1949 and Aphelenchoides n. ord. Helminthological Abstracts, Series B, 49: 143-170.
Truskova, G.M. 1973. Two new species of Aphelenchoides Fischer 1894, (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae). Parazitologiya, 7: 188–189.
Zhang, Y., S. Li, H. Li, R. Wang, K.Q. Zhang and J. Xu. 2020. Fungi nematode interactions: Diversity, ecology, and biocontrol prospects in agriculture. J. Fungi., 6: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040206
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?