Epidemiology and in vitro Drug Susceptibility of mecA Positive MDR S. aureus from Camel Subclinical Mastitis
Epidemiology and in vitro Drug Susceptibility of mecA Positive MDR S. aureus from Camel Subclinical Mastitis
Mahboob Ali1, Muhammad Avais1, Riaz Hussain2, Kashif Prince1,*, Muhammad Ijaz1, Mamoona Chaudhry 3, Sehrish Firyal4, Amjad Islam Aqib1, Naimat Ullah Khan5 , Mian Saeed Sarwar5, Hazrat Ali5, Shahid Hussain Farooqi1, Ikramul Haq1 and Muhammad Sajid Hasni3
1Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54600
2Department of Pathobiology, University College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Islamia University, Bahawalpur 63100
3Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54600
4Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54600
5College of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan
ABSTRACT
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is emerging as multiple drug resistant (MDR) pathogens in milk of camels with characteristically zoonotic potential. Current study was planned to investigate epidemiology of MDR S. aureus in camel milk, and in-vitro therapeutic response to drugs. Two different ecological zones, Cholistan (n=185) and Suleiman Range (n=177) of Pakistan having major population of camel were screened for subclinical mastitis using California mastitis test using convenient sampling technique. Biochemical examination was performed to isolate S. aureus that further were tested Penicillin, Glycopeptide, and Cephalosporin classes of antibiotics for confirmation of MDR isolates using disk diffusion method. MDR were tested in vitro for response against various antibiotics. A questionnaire was filled for estimation of association of assumed risk factors with prevalence. Nonparametric tests at 5% probability were applied to check significance of results. The study noted overall 33.98% (123/362) of MDR S. aureus from subclinical mastitis milk samples while 123 of 192 S. aureus isolates (64.06%) were confirmed MDR. Non-significantly higher prevalence of MDR was noted in Cholistan area (38.38%) than to that of Sulaiman Range (29.98%) on subclinical mastitis samples basis Similarly 66.36% of S. aureus isolates from Cholistan area and 61.18% from Suleiman Range were presented themselves as MDR. Oxacillin, Cefoxitin and Ampicillin faced 100% resistance while Vancomycin, Cefixime and Cefotaxime had >78 % of resistance from MDR isolates from both study areas. However, Trimethoprim and Ciprofloxacin were > 90%, Chloramphenicol >69%, and Gentamycin 61-67.3%, Streptomicin 61-73.07% and Oxytetracycline 69-71.15%, Enoxacin 45.07 and 53.84% and Amikacin 43.6 and 51.92 effective against MDR. Older age of animals, higher California mastitis score, weak body condition, higher milk yield, early lactation, teat injury, higher parity number, tick infestation, self-treatment and higher use of penicillin in general ailments had positive association with MDR prevalence. The study concluded higher prevalence of MDR S. aureus in camel milk with significant association of assumed risk factors and some of antibiotics presented higher scope of treatment.
Article Information
Received 26 November 2017
Revised 13 December 2017
Accepted 24 January 2018
Available online 11 March 2018
Authors’ Contribution
M Ali, KP, M Avais and RH made field visits, collected samples and data. MSH and AIA did laboratory work. HA and IH wrote the manuscript. MI, MC and SF designed the project. NUK and MSS reviewed the anuscript. SHF statistically analysed the study.
Key words
MDR S. aureus, Camel, Mastitis, Antibiotic susceptibility, Cholistan.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2018.50.2.603.609
* Corresponding author: kashif_prince@live.com
0030-9923/2018/0002-0603 $ 9.00/0
Copyright 2018 Zoological Society of Pakistan
Introduction
Camel has emerged as 3rd most milk yielding specie in Pakistan despite of 1% of total animal population (Anonymous, 2015). The milk of this species has individuality of its acceptance for consumption as raw, pasteurized and processed form thus obtaining access to the markets of Gulf countries (El-Agamy and Khatab, 1992) with highest milk yield reported to be 35-40 liters. Camel milk consumption is expected to go double with already ten time higher consumption in comparison to that of meat of this specie. The milk is characteristically blessed with lysozyme and lactoferrin that have antibacterial activity (Beg et al., 1986). Despite of medicinal and nutritive characteristics of camel milk bacterial contamination resulting into mastitis is rising (Aqib et al., 2017a) with S. aureus as major pathogen. Adding to this is resistance development against mastitogen. The studies are fewer than needed to address the bacterial isolation and its resistance against antibiotics (Aqib et al., 2017b).
Antibiotics used against bacterial isolates are facing resistance which in turn complicates infectious disease management. The complications in disease management are increasing in multitude due to drug resistance (Iqbal et al., 2002). This pattern has given rise to concept of multiple drug resistance in bacterial species. The bacteria resisting more than two classes of antibiotics are regarded as multiple drug resistant (MDR). The MDRs are currently amongst salient emerging challenges of mastitis etiologies (Hameed et al., 2006).
S. aureus is zoonotic pathogen that gets transmitted to humans through contaminated milk, milk products and coming in contact with contaminated animal skin (Seifu et al., 2004). The pathogen presented itself emerging pathogen of mammary gland of dairy animals (Arbeit et al., 1998). Intra mammary infection executed by S. aureus put animal to chronicity as bacteria hide it in mammary epithelium cells (Yousaf, 2009). Recent studies have demonstrated increased subclinical mastitis in camels with especial perspective of S. aureus mastitogen (Ahmad et al., 2012; Aqib et al., 2017a, b). The lavish and unjustified use of antibiotics has put this bacteria strongly develop resistance thus emerged as MDR S. aureus. There has not been study so far addressing MDR S. aureus from camel milk. Keeping in view the importance of this pathogen following study was designed to check the prevalence of MDR and its assumed risk factors from camel subclinical mastitis.
Materials and methods
Screening of subclinical mastitis samples
The subclinical mastitis samples based on California mastitis test for current study were practiced from various areas of Cholistan desert of province Punjab and Suleiman Range of Baluchistan. Camel milk (10 ml) was collected aseptically into capped tubes after abandoning of initial few streaks with prior washing and rinsing of teat apices with 70 % alcohol swabs. Using convenient sampling technique subclinical mastitis samples from Cholistan (n=185) and Suleiman Range (n=177) were collected strictly observing regulations of National Mastitis Council. The milk samples were transferred in a cold chain (4οC) to department of Clinical Medicine and stored at -20οC until further use.
Biochemical identification of S. aureus
Subclinical mastitis samples were processed to microbiological examination for isolation of S. aureus by centrifuging 2 mL milk 2000 g for 10 min resultantly swabbing sedimentation for direct microbiological demonstration on blood agar medium having 5% defibrinated sheep blood and incubated for 24-48 h at 37oC. The mannitol salt agar was used as selective medium for S. aureus. The gram staining was performed and slide was visualized under microscope at 100X with oil emulsion. Further biochemical tests were performed as per flow chart of Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Holt et al., 1994). The pool observations were used for identification of bacteria.
Risk factors analysis
A dichotomous questionnaire having information of age of animal, California Mastitis Test (CMT) score, body condition, teat health, parity, milking process hygiene, milk yield, lactation stage, tick infestation, treatment approach, and therapeutic drugs use were gathered to assume these as determinants of disease.
Multiple drug resistant S. aureus
Biochemically characterized S. aureus were put to antibiotic susceptibility against Oxacillin and Ampicillin (Penicillin), Cefoxitin (Cephalosporin), and Vancomycin (Glycopeptide). The isolates showing resistance to more than two classes of antibiotics were considered as MDR S. aureus. These MDR S. aureus were then assessed for their susceptibility against various antibiotics including Trimethoprim (25ug), Amikacin (30µg), Oxytetracycline (30µg), Gentamicin (10µg), Ciprofloxacin (5µg), Cefotaxime (30µg), Cefixime (5µg), Chloramphenicol (30µg), Enoxacin (10µg), and Streptomycin (10µg) antibiotics on following guidelines (Bauer et al., 1966).The activated 0.5 McFarland culture of S. aureus were swabbed on Muller Hinton agar that was kept for five minutes to get dry. The antibiotic discs were aseptically placed on Muller Hinton agar by automatic disc dispenser and kept in incubator at 37°C for 24 h. The zones of inhibition formed around discs were measured by Vernier calipers and were compared with standard provided by Clinical laboratory standards institute (CLSI, 2016). The sensitivity pattern against aforementioned was checked to declare S. aureus as multiple drug resistant.
PCR confirmation of MDR S. aureus
The MDR S. aureus was confirmed by mecA gene identification in S. aureus. The specification of mecA gene was P1: 59-TGGCATTCGTGTCACAATCG-39 and P2: 59- CTGGAACTTGTTGAGCAGAG-3 (Galdiero et al., 2003). The PCR was performed in a final volume of 20μl consisting of 10µl of TOPreal™ qPCR 2x PreMIX, 2µl of DNA sample and 1µmol of each primer. Reaction was cycled 35 times after initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes with denaturation at 95°C, annealing at 58°C and extension step at 72°C, each step was given 30 seconds, a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min was performed. A positive control and a negative control were included in each PCR run. The PCR products were observed for positive bands against a molecular ladder 100bp on 2% Agarose gel. The bands observed at 310bp level were considered positive.
Statistical analysis
Prevalence of MDR S. aureus was calculated by Thrushfield formula (Thrushfield, 2007) while non-parametric statistical analysis was performed to investigate association of risk factors at 5 % probability using SPSS version 22 of statistical computer programme.
Results
Prevalence of multiple drug resistant S. aureus
The study found 33.98% (123/362) of MDR S. aureus isolates from subclinical camel mastitis (n=362) samples. There was 29.38% (52/177) of MDR S. aureus from subclinical mastitis samples (n=177) in camel from Suleiman Range (Table I). The different areas of Sulaiman range presented significant difference (p<0.05) of MDR prevalence with 48.16% prevalence of MDR S. aureus in Tuman Buzdar followed by Barthi, Fazla, Baikar, Kharr Buzdar, and Rakni giving 41.467%, 25%, 23.81%, and 6.67%, respectively. The prevalence of MDR S. aureus from subclinical camel mastitis was found 38.38% (71/185) from Cholistan desert area with non-significant difference (p>0.05) among various areas (Table I). The highest MDR prevalence was noted in Chanan Peer while lowest was found from Thalan Wala area of Cholistan giving rise to 46.43 and 29.17%, respectively among subclinical mastitis samples. Similarly non-significant difference of MDR S. aureus was noted from S. aureus samples obtained from various areas of Cholistan.
On the other hand from 192 S. aureus isolates 64.06% (123/192) were confirmed as MDR (Table I). The study reported 61.18% of MDR from S. aureus isolates obtained from camel milk in Baluchistan province (Table I). Higher prevalence in all areas of Suleiman range of province Baluchistan was noted with non-significant difference with in the area (p>0.05). However, Rakni area of Sulaiman presented lowest MDR from S. aureus while Baikar presented highest MDR from S. aureus with 20% and 83.33%, respectively. The overall MDR from S. aureus in Cholistan desert area was found 66.36%. Highest MDR from S. aureus was noted in Jam Sar while lowest prevalence was found in Chanan Peer areas of Cholistan desert exhibiting 80 and 62.50%, respectively.
Table I.- Prevalence of multiple drug resistant S. aureus in camel milk from areas of two distinct ecological zones.
Area |
From subclinical mastitis (CMT) basis* |
From Staphylococcus aureus samples** |
||||||
No examined |
Prevalence (%) |
CI (95%) |
p-value |
No examined |
Prevalence (%) |
CI (95%) |
p-value |
|
Cholistan Desert Area | ||||||||
Malkani |
26 |
38.46 |
20.2-59.4 |
0.805 |
15 |
66.67 |
------ |
0.966 |
Nagra |
28 |
46.43 |
27.5-66.1 |
20 |
65.00 |
38.4-88.2 |
||
Din Garh |
31 |
38.71 |
21.8-57.8 |
19 |
63.16 |
38.4-83.7 |
||
Chanan Peer |
33 |
45.54 |
28.1-63.6 |
24 |
62.50 |
40.6-81.2 |
||
Noor Sar |
17 |
35.29 |
14.2-61.7 |
08 |
75.00 |
34.9-96.8 |
||
Thalan Wala |
24 |
29.17 |
12.6-51.1 |
11 |
63.63 |
30.8-89.1 |
||
Jam Sar |
26 |
30.77 |
14.3-51.8 |
10 |
80.00 |
44.4-97.5 |
||
Total (a) |
185 |
38.38 |
31.3-45.8 |
107 |
66.36 |
56.6-75.2 |
||
Suleiman Mountain Range | ||||||||
Barthi |
41 |
41.46 |
26.3-57.9 |
0.014 |
25 |
68.00 |
46.5-85.1 |
0.356 |
Tuman Buzdar |
27 |
48.15 |
28.7-68.1 |
23 |
56.52 |
34.5-76.8 |
||
Fazla |
52 |
25.00 |
14.0-38.9 |
21 |
61.90 |
38.4-81.9 |
||
Rakni |
15 |
6.670 |
0.17-31.9 |
5 |
20.00 |
19.5-51.6 |
||
Kharr Buzdar |
21 |
14.28 |
03.0-36.3 |
5 |
60.00 |
14.7-94.7 |
||
Baikar |
21 |
23.81 |
8.20-47.2 |
6 |
83.33 |
35.9-99.6 |
||
Total (b) |
177 |
29.38 |
22.8-36.7 |
85 |
61.18 |
50.0-71.6 |
|
|
Overall (a+b) |
362 |
33.98 |
10.9-18.4 |
192 |
64.06 |
56.8-70.8 |
|
p-value<0.05 indicate significant difference. *MDR Staph aureus on the basis of subclinical mastitis between Cholistan and Suleiman Range p=0.071. ** MDR Staph aureus from Staph aureus isolates between Cholistan and Suleiman Range p=0.458.
Comparison of MDR isolates of S. aureus from two distinct zones (Cholistan desert of Punjab and Suleiman Range of Baluchistan) showed non-significant difference (p>0.05) with however higher prevalence from Cholistan followed by Suleiman Range with 66.36% and 61.18%, respectively. Similarly prevalence of MDR S. aureus from subclinical mastitis samples presented non-significant difference (p>0.05) between two distinct zones. The prevalence of MDR S. aureus was however higher in camels from Cholistan compared to that of Suleiman Range.
Antibiotic susceptibility against MDR S. aureus
The study found Oxacillin 100%, Cefoxitin 100%, Ampicillin 100%, Cefotaxime84.5% and 71.15%, Vancomycin 78.87 and 78.84%, Cefixime 70.42 and 76.92% facing resistance MDR S. aureus obtained from Cholistan and Suleiman Range, respectively (Table II). However, Trimethoprim presented 90.14 and 92.3%, Ciprofloxacin 91.14% and 94.23%, Chloramphenicol 71.83 and 69.23%, Oxytetracycline 69.01 and 71.15%, Streptomicin 61.97 and 73.07%, Gentamicin 61.97 and 67.3%, Amikacin 43.6 and 51.92, and Enoxacin 45.07 and 53.84% effectiveness in inhibiting MDR S. aureus isolates of camel mastitis from Cholistan and Suleiman Range, respectively. Some of drugs also showed 5.79-32.39% of intermediate type of response against S. aureus isolates.
Risk factors
The assumed risk factors studied for prevalence of MDR S. aureus from subclinical mastitis samples from camels dwelling in Suleiman Range and Cholistan desert of Pakistan presented significant association regarding age of animal, CMT score, body condition, teat health, milking hygiene, milk yield, lactation stage, tick infestation, treatment approach, and therapeutic drugs use (Table III).
The increasing age of animal was found more prone toward having MDR S. aureus compared to early age of she camels. The camels in Suleiman Range with 7-10 years of age did present higher prevalence of MDR while >10 years of age was found presenting two times more prevalence of MDR S. aureus. The increased CMT score was found positively associated with MDR S. aureus prevalence. The weak body condition was found more prone to have MDR S. aureus in she camels than to normal body condition of camels from both zones. Injured teats were two times more prone toward MDR S. aureus prevalence compared to normal teats in both camel rearing areas. The increased parity number was found positively associated with prevalence of pathogen however early lactation presented more prevalence. The camels having tick infestation on their teat had higher prevalence of pathogen. Self-treatment and use of Penicillin was found risk factor for higher prevalence of MDR S. aureus in both camel rearing areas.
Table II.- Antibiotic response against MDR S. aureusisolates of camel subclinical mastitis.
Drugs used
|
Potency
|
Cholistan sampling area (n=71) |
Suleiman Mountain Range (n=52) |
||||
S(%) |
I (%) |
R (%) |
S (%) |
I(%) |
R(%) |
||
Oxacillin | 10µg |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
Cefoxitin | 30 µg |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
Trimethoprim | 25ug |
91.54 |
8.450 |
0.000 |
92.30 |
7.690 |
0.000 |
Ciprofloxacin | 5 µg |
90.14 |
9.850 |
0.000 |
94.23 |
5.790 |
0.000 |
Gentamicin | 10 µg |
61.97 |
12.67 |
25.35 |
67.30 |
11.53 |
21.15 |
Cefotaxime | 30 µg |
2.810 |
12.67 |
84.5 |
17.30 |
11.53 |
71.15 |
Vancomycin | 30µg |
0.000 |
21.12 |
78.87 |
0.000 |
21.15 |
78.84 |
Oxytetracycline | 30µg |
69.01 |
9.850 |
21.12 |
71.15 |
9.610 |
19.33 |
Cefixime | 5µg |
16.90 |
12.67 |
70.42 |
15.38 |
7.690 |
76.92 |
Chloramphenicol | 30µg |
71.83 |
12.67 |
15.49 |
69.23 |
13.46 |
17.30 |
Ampicillin | 10µg |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
100.0 |
Streptomicin | 10 µg |
61.97 |
32.39 |
5.630 |
73.07 |
9.610 |
17.30 |
Amikacin | 30 µg |
43.66 |
18.30 |
38.02 |
51.92 |
21.15 |
26.92 |
Enoxacin | 10 µg |
45.07 |
36.61 |
18.30 |
53.84 |
19.23 |
25.00 |
S, sensitive; I, intermediate; R, resistant.
Table III.- Risk factor association with MDR Staphylococcus aureus obtained from subclinical camel mastitis from Suleiman Mountain Range and Cholistan Desert Area.
Parameter | Level |
Suleiman Range |
Cholistan Desert |
||||
No examined |
Prevalence |
p-value |
No examined |
Prevalence |
p-value |
||
Age of animal | 4-6 year |
74 |
17.57 |
0.014 |
52 |
19.23 |
0.000 |
7-10 year |
41 |
39.02 |
97 |
34.02 |
|||
>10 year |
62 |
37.10 |
36 |
77.78 |
|||
CMT score | +1 |
19 |
10.53 |
0.000 |
29 |
20.69 |
0.002 |
+2 |
96 |
27.08 |
110 |
34.54 |
|||
+3 |
62 |
38.71 |
46 |
58.70 |
|||
Body condition | Weak |
90 |
43.33 |
0.000 |
99 |
50.50 |
0.000 |
Normal |
87 |
14.94 |
86 |
24.42 |
|||
Teat Health | Injured |
67 |
55.22 |
0.000 |
85 |
64.71 |
0.000 |
Normal |
110 |
13.64 |
100 |
16.00 |
|||
Parity | 1-2 |
117 |
19.66 |
0.000 |
79 |
15.19 |
0.000 |
3-4 |
15 |
26.67 |
50 |
36.00 |
|||
>4 |
45 |
55.56 |
56 |
73.21 |
|||
Milking process Hygiene | Unhygienic |
125 |
33.6 |
0.000 |
135 |
46.67 |
0.000 |
Acceptable |
52 |
19.23 |
50 |
16.00 |
|||
Milk Yield | 1-2 liters |
65 |
24.61 |
0.000 |
80 |
18.75 |
0.000 |
3-5 liters |
87 |
26.44 |
40 |
40.00 |
|||
>5 liters |
33 |
75.76 |
65 |
61.54 |
|||
Lactation stage | 1-4 months |
64 |
32.81 |
0.49 |
65 |
40.00 |
0.864 |
5-7months |
84 |
29.76 |
88 |
36.36 |
|||
8-12months |
29 |
20.69 |
32 |
40.62 |
|||
Tick infestation | Yes |
92 |
39.13 |
0.003 |
105 |
50.48 |
0.000 |
No |
85 |
18.82 |
80 |
22.50 |
|||
Treatment approach |
Self |
127 |
33.86 |
0.037 |
130 |
48.46 |
0.000 |
Professional consultancy |
50 |
18 |
55 |
14.54 |
|||
Therapeutic drug use |
Penicillin in first preference |
102 |
44.12 |
0.000 |
110 |
55.45 |
0.000 |
Case specific |
75 |
9.33 |
75 |
13.33 |
p-value <0.05 indicate significant difference.
Discussion
Prevalence of MDR S. aureus
Previous studies did not report MDR S. aureus prevalence in camel milk. However, higher prevalence of S. aureus is positively associated with higher mastitis percentages. Higher prevalence of S. aureus of current study was in agreement with findings of Ahmad et al. (2012) and Aqib et al. (2017b). The current study areas are having higher tick prevalence; thorny bushes and general habit of tying of teats with bushes pave the way to get mammary inflammations (Woubit et al., 2001; Abdurahman, 2006). Structural parts of mammary glands like teat skin, teat orifice, and teat canal are considered as key sites of S. aureus adherence (Frost et al., 1977). The animals are frequently exposed to teat injuries leading to inflammation of mammary glands which favors invasion of microbes. The conventional unjustified treatment approaches help spread of S. aureus like contagious pathogens with subsequent resistance development against various classes of antibiotics.
Risk factors
The higher prevalence of MDR in older age of animals might be because of increased dilatation of teats (Shittu et al., 2012) partial opening of teat orifice due to repeated lactations (Schroeder, 2010) resulting in repeated exposure of mastitis and reduced physiology of immune system that gives opportunity to bacterial invasions (Abdurahman, 2006). Moreover, older animals’ teat orifice left partially open due to repeated lactations which invites environmental and skin bacteria to invade. Early lactation is reported due to lower resistance of immune system in early age and chances of newer infections in dry periods make intra mammary infection more susceptible. Ticks act as spread of contagious pathogen from one animal to other in addition to injuries inflicted which are source of having bacterial contamination (Seifu and Tafesse, 2010).
The camel herders in Pakistan are habitually unhygienic during milking while S. aureus spread during milking process (Dodd, 1983) so unhygienic milking is potential risk factors for spread of this pathogen. Multiparous animals are reported to have higher prevalence of mastitis due to spread of infection from one to next parity (Abdurahman, 2006). The animals in study area are devoid of health care facilities and once infection is established its spread to next parity is inevitable.
Antibiotic susceptibility
The increased resistance of Penicillin group and Vancomycin was in line with findings of Aqib et al. (2017b) while contrary to current study 100% resistance of S. aureus against Chloramphenicol was noticed in their study. The sensitivity of drugs of current study was also in line with finding of aforementioned previous study. The findings of current study are also in line with Najeeb et al. (2013) and Abdulkadhim (2012). Efficacy of Sulphonamides of current study was in agreement with findings of Aqib et al. (2017b), Fazlani et al. (2011) and Rind and Sheikh (2001). The higher resistance to beta lactam group in current study might be because of unjustified use of penicillin group that was observation of current study. Moreover self-approach of treatment of ailments without proper diagnosis paves way to resistance against antibiotics.
The study found higher prevalence of multiple drug resistant S. aureus in both ecological zones. The assumed risk factors were significantly associated with prevalence of pathogen. Trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, streptomicin, oxytetracycline, amikacin and enoxacin were found effective in combating multiple drug resistant Staph. aureus. The study demands immediately attention to take effective preventive measures in order to stop spread of this pathogen and to search out effective treatment avenues.
Acknowledgments
The author is thankful to Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery and Department of Microbiology for the provision of laboratories and technical assistance.
Statement of conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
References
Abdulkadhim, M.H., 2012. Prevalence of methicillin resistance staphylococcus aureus in cattle and she camels milk at Al-Qadisyia Province. Al-Anbar J. Vet. Sci., 5: 63-67.
Abdurahman, O.A., 2006. Udder health and milk quality among camels in the Errer valley of Eastern Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Develop., 18: 110.
Ahmad, S., Yaqoob, M., Bilal, M.Q., Muhammad, G., Yang, L.G., Khan, M.K. and Tariq, M., 2012. Risk factors associated with prevalence and major bacterial causes of mastitis in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) under different production systems. Trop. Anim. Hlth. Prod., 44: 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9895-0
Anonymous, 2015. Economic survey of Pakistan. Finance Division, Government of Pakistan, Economic Advisors Wing, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 40-45.
Aqib, A.I., Ijaz, M., Hussain. R., Durrani, A.Z., Anjum, A.A., Rizwan, A., Sana, S., Farooqi, S.H. and Hussain, K., 2017a. Identification of coagulase gene in S. aureus isolates recovered from subclinical mastitis in camels. Pak. Vet. J., 37: 160-164.
Aqib, A.I., Ijaz, M., Durrani, A.Z., Anjum, A.A., Hussain, R., Sana, S., Farooqi, S.H., Hussain, K. and Ahmad, S.S., 2017b. Prevalence and antibiogram of S. aureus, a camel mastitogen from Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 861-867. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.3.861.867
Arbeit, D., Archer, G. and Crossley, T., 1998. Laboratory procedures for the epidemiological analysis of staphylococci. In: Staphylococci and staphylococci diseases. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp. 203-286.
Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.M., Sherris, J.C. and Turck, M., 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. clin. Pathol., 45: 493-496.
Beg, O.U., Von-Bahr-Lindststrom, H., Zaidi, Z.H. and Jornvall, H., 1986. Characterisation of camel milk protein rich proline identifies new beta casein fragment. Regul. Pep., 15: 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-0115(86)90075-3
CLSI, 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-Fifth informational supplement, CLSI document M100-25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Dodd, F.H., 1983. Mastitis: Progress on control. J. Dairy Sci., 66: 1773-1780. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)82005-0
El-Agamy, E.I. and Khatab, A.A., 1992. Physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of Egyptian human milk. Alexandria J. agric. Res., 37: 115-26.
Fazlani, S.A., Khan, S.A., Faraz, S. and Awan, M.S., 2011. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial species identified from mastitic milk samples of camel. Afr. J. Biotech., 10: 2959-2964. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.716
Frost, A.J., Wanasinghe, D.D. and Woolcock, J.B., 1977. Some factors affecting selective adherence of microorganisms in the bovine mammary gland. Infect. Immun.,15: 245-253.
Galdiero, E., Liguori, G., Isanto., M.D., Damiano, N. and Sommese, L., 2003. Distribution of mecA among methicillin-resistant clinical staphylococcal strains isolated at hospitals in Naples, Italy. Eur. J. Epidemiol., 18: 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023067930211
Hameed., Karima, G.A., Grazyna, S. and Agnieszka, K.K., 2006. Public health hazard due to mastitis in dairy cows. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 2: 73-85.
Holt, J.G., Krieg, N.R., Sneath, P.H.A., Staley, J.T. and Williams, S.T., 1994. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
Iqbal, M., Patel, I.K., Ain, Q., Barney, N., Kiani, Q., Rabbani, K.Z., Zaidi, G., Mehdi, B. and Shah, S.H., 2002. Susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli: Prevalence of multidrug-resistant isolates and extended spectrum Beta-Lactamase phenotype. J. Pak. med. Assoc., 52: 407-411.
Najeeb, M.F., Anjum, A.A., Ahmad, M.U.D., Khan, H.M., Ali, M.A. and Sattar, M.M.K., 2013. Bacterial etiology of subclinical mastitis in dairy goats and multiple drug resistance of the isolates. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 23: 1541-1544.
Rind, R. and Shaikh, S.N., 2001. In vitro antibiotics susceptibility of bacterial species, identified from uteri of slaughter goats. Pak. J. biol. Sci., 4: 861- 865. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2001.861.865
Seifu, E. and Tafesse, B., 2010. Prevalence and etiology of mastitis in traditionally managed camels (Camelus dromedarius) in selected pastoral areas in eastern Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J., 14: 103-113.
Seifu, E., Buys, E.M., Donkin, E.F. and Petzer, I.M., 2004. Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system against food-borne pathogens in Saanen and South African indigenous goat milk. Fd. Contr., 15: 447-452.
Shittu, A., Jamilu, A., Aliyu, J., Aminu, A.M. and Folorunso, O.F., 2012. Sub-clinical mastitis and associated risk factors on lactating cows in the Savannah Region of Nigeria. BMC Vet. Res., 8: 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-134
Schroeder, J.W., 2010. Bovine mastitis and milking management. Extension Bulletin AS-1129. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105.
Thrushfield, M., 2007. Veterinary epidemiology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Limited, USA, pp. 180-181.
Woubit, S., Bayleyegn, M., Bonnet, P. and Jean-Baptiste, S., 2001. Camel (Camelus dromedarius) mastitis in Borena lowland pastoral area, southwestern Ethiopia. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop., 54: 207-212. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9774
Yousaf, M., 2009. Evaluation of some non-antibiotic antibacterials in the treatment of bubaline mastitis. PhD thesis, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?