Submit or Track your Manuscript LOG-IN

Impact of Pre-Freezing Duration on Buck Semen Quality in Eppendorf Tubes

Impact of Pre-Freezing Duration on Buck Semen Quality in Eppendorf Tubes

Lalu Ahmad Zaenuri*, Enny Yuliani

Faculty of Animal Science University of Mataram, Majapahit Street, No. 62, Mataram Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.

 
*Correspondence | Lalu Ahmad Zaenuri, Faculty of Animal Science University of Mataram, Majapahit Street, No. 62, Mataram Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia; Email: [email protected] 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to evaluate a manual protocol for freezing semen in Eppendorf tubes. The research utilized semen from a healthy and fertile Kacang buck weighing 45 kg and aged 3 years. The semen extender employed was Tris-egg yolk. The study was conducted using a 3 x 5 Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The first factor examined was the pre-freezing duration, which included 10, 15, and 20 minutes (T1, T2, and T3, respectively). The second factor assessed was the post-thawing storage time of 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. After equilibration, Eppendorf tubes containing liquid semen were placed four centimeters above liquid nitrogen (LN2) in a Styrofoam container and then frozen by immersion in LN2. Total motility, progressive motility, plasma membrane integrity, and viability were measured at 0 and every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes post-thawing. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test. At 120 minutes post-thawing, total motility at T1 decreased from 51.02 ± 2.57 to 24.31 ± 4.25, which was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than T2 and T3, which showed motility values of 61.40 ± 2.31 to 29.11 ± 3.26 and 62.19 ± 3.15 to 41.19 ± 1.12, respectively. A similar trend was observed for the percentage of progressive motility, which was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in T3 (39.13 ± 1.02) compared to T1 (12.03 ± 3.16) and T2 (21.21 ± 1.26). Additionally, the PMI 120 minutes after thawing for F1, F2, and F3 were 29.07 ± 2.17, 33.04 ± 2.17, and 45.04 ± 2.17, respectively. The viability of sperm for F1, F2, and F3 were recorded as 31.02 ± 2.15, 30.08 ± 1.17, and 43.03 ± 1.06, respectively. In conclusion, the manual, cost-effective semen freezing method is suitable for small laboratories. Future research should examine how different extenders, equilibration, and pre-freezing durations affect post-thaw semen quality, and validate fertilization rates against modern methods.
 
Keywords | Eppendarf, Sperm quality, Pre-freezing, AI, Simple, Cheap

To share on other social networks, click on any share button. What are these?

Pakistan Journal of Zoology

November

Pakistan J. Zool., Vol. 56

Featuring

Click here for more

Subscribe Today

Receive free updates on new articles, opportunities and benefits


Subscribe Unsubscribe